Dogs never ask for consent, and women have no problem with it.

[RobertGarnicasAPedo]

A dog can put its nose or tongue wherever it wants on a woman - on her tits, in her crotch, etc. - and she's fine with it, unless she's not a dog person.

Same with cats with cat people.

If a sub-Chad tried the same, he would be guilty of "sexual assault."

Why do women consider it so much worse when ugly men do it? I don't mean in a, "well, humans can rationalize, so they know it's wrong" way.

I mean, why aren't women bothered by it when a dog or cat does it?

Once you ponder this for a moment, the answer becomes clear.

Because women find dogs physically attractive. They're furry and automatically attractive to them.

Whereas if a SPIDER tried doing the same thing (if spiders could lick people...maybe they can?)...well, you know the reaction is similar to when a sub-Chad does it.

Spiders are creepy. It must be their personality!

 

[DespressedCurryCel1]

XD

 

[Izayacel]

Good Point , Woman are hypocrits and Cats have more Value Then average man , given how attraktive Woman treat Cats.

Clownworld

 

[sneed (not chuck)]

100 IQ post

 

[Jotogo]

100 IQ post

That's a way of saying water is wet

 

[RobertGarnicasAPedo]

Lifefuel for spidercels:

 

[-TheRinku127-]

Bestialitypill strikes again

 

[Indari]

Ah, well you see there's a perfectly reasonable explanation for this:

Spoiler

Robert Garnica is a pedo

 

[deucegigalo]

Ive noticed they even like scary ass digs too like rotweilers and such the chads of the dogworld i hope they get bitten on the vagina and get rabies

 

[Govid_Dorious]

Good Point , Woman are hypocrits and Cats have more Value Then average man , given how attraktive Woman treat Cats.

Clownworld

 

[Govid_Dorious]

 

[Med Amine]

i really though dogs dicks are small

 

[12 Years a Rotter]

Lifefuel for spidercels:

she is less freaked out by a hairy tarantula on her tits than an ugly shitskin curry asking how her day is

 

[Nikalas]

she is less freaked out by a hairy tarantula on her tits than an ugly shitskin curry asking how her day is

Brutal

 

[The Abyss]

Yeah they're attracted to them & can't get pregnant by them.

I find it strange when women think an ugly dog breed is cute yet treat the human equivalent with ewww.

 

[The Abyss]

i really though dogs dicks are small

Depends on the breed.

 

[hollowcel]

consent is a social construct

 

[Dishonoured]

Why do you think so many foids become crazy cat ladies when they're old?

 

[Repulsive123]

XD

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

A dog can put its nose or tongue wherever it wants on a woman - on her tits, in her crotch, etc. - and she's fine with it, unless she's not a dog person.

Same with cats with cat people.

If a sub-Chad tried the same, he would be guilty of "sexual assault."

Why do women consider it so much worse when ugly men do it? I don't mean in a, "well, humans can rationalize, so they know it's wrong" way.

I mean, why aren't women bothered by it when a dog or cat does it?

Once you ponder this for a moment, the answer becomes clear.

Because women find dogs physically attractive. They're furry and automatically attractive to them.

Whereas if a SPIDER tried doing the same thing (if spiders could lick people...maybe they can?)...well, you know the reaction is similar to when a sub-Chad does it.

Spiders are creepy. It must be their personality!

It's over for sub-dogs and sub-cats.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

100 IQ post

I like your username. I don't get the reference, but I like it.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

View attachment 707416

Waiting for his evil twin brother to post here under "chuck (again, not sneed)"

 

[Rambocel]

she is less freaked out by a hairy tarantula on her tits than an ugly shitskin curry asking how her day is

Does the spider smell and look like flaming ass too though?

 

[12 Years a Rotter]

Does the spider smell and look like flaming ass too though?

tbh

 

[ntdegencel]

They complain when we perceive them as childish and irrational yet it's fine for them to see us as below literal animals jfl