tldr, foid tries to explain the concept of boundaries; the point she actually made was, do whatever the fuck you want with straight men it does not matter. BUT NEVER EVER EVER EVEN REMOTELY INCONVENIENCE OR DISCOMFORT A FOID OR GAY MAN
i had a 3 hour lecture today at my medschool on "boundaries in medical practice" which was probably the stupidest lecture i've attended in my life. over the 3 hours the foid giving the lecture could not clearly define what act would be considered as crossing a boundary and kept referring to it as "making someone feel uncomfortable". the fuckery is that she is not a medical doctor but some phd student in social sciences and was introduced to the class as an "expert in the field of professional misconducts".
she was yapping about how "boundaries are personal rules people set to guide their own behaviour and protect their wellbeing, when you want to hang out with someone from the hospital (a colleague not patient), you can ask for it, but if they say no you can never ask again". then she went on to medical boundaries which pissed me off further because she was saying how you should not compliment or criticise a patient on their body. if my patient is a landwhale that will die of a heart condition or if its an anorexic under the hippocratic oath i will be bound to point out the risks, but apparently thats a breach of a core boundary.
she was then yapping about "the importance of being mindful while working with people of a different gender" to us of not accidentally touching them inappropriately while using a stethoscope, not asking people about their sex lives (if you're in medicine or if you've just been to a doctor, you'd know that under some circumstances a doctor NEEDS to ask his patient about their sex lives to assess their issue properly), and spent an hour of the lecture explaining how to report someone for misconduct, and gave us vignettes to work among groups of five to assess what's ok and what isn't ok. i did not speak to people in my group cause they were libtards so i just pretended to agree with whatever the fuck they said. i also had no interest in spending my brain power over this retard shit.
worst part was one of the vignettes was about a gay man coming in for a prostate exam. even the libtards of my group agreed that it should be okay to do it, considering the bloke has literally booked an appointment for the purpose, obviously he should be ok with it as he had specifically asked for it. when the confident chadlite in my group shared this answer her face turned weird and she said "so actually that is an example of something you should never do, considering the sexuality of the man is known, you must explain how it works first, ask for consent, ask him to get ready, ask for consent again, and check in on his well being after the examination is done. unless the sexuality of the man is confirmed to be purely heterosexual, it is not okay to assume a man is okay with getting a prostate exam even if he voluntarily asked for it".
what the actual fuck is this stupidity, especially coming from the mouth of "an expert". from her explanation, boundaries seem to be a concept that only applies to foids and gay men? it just confused me so much. also anything in between "" is her actual verbatim that i have copied from the lecture transcript.
ALSO BASED ON HER OWN LECTURE SHE VIOLATED A BOUNDARY OF MINE, SHE CORNERED ME AFTER THE LECTURE FOR NOT PARTICIPATING, ASKING ME MULTIPLE TIMES OVER IF I'VE "have a good understanding of everything we discussed today". i also told her that i was autistic after the second time she asked me and that's why i am silent. she said "i understand and appreciate you confiding in me but if you don't respond i will never know if you understand or not". my head was like bitch that is my boundary and according to your definition, you saying this is a violation of my boundary. i didnt feel any discomfort at that but according to everthing she said over the three hours, SHE BASICALLY VIOLATED MY BOUNDARY by pushing neurotypical standards on me even after i shared my disability. now can i play a reverse card and send her a strongly worded email saying this was unacceptable behaviour, citing her own points from the lecture slides? i am considering doing it, if i do write the email i will share it here before sending and update if she responds. im just terrified of it becoming a thing and that i would get in trouble with the university.
i had a 3 hour lecture today at my medschool on "boundaries in medical practice" which was probably the stupidest lecture i've attended in my life. over the 3 hours the foid giving the lecture could not clearly define what act would be considered as crossing a boundary and kept referring to it as "making someone feel uncomfortable". the fuckery is that she is not a medical doctor but some phd student in social sciences and was introduced to the class as an "expert in the field of professional misconducts".
she was yapping about how "boundaries are personal rules people set to guide their own behaviour and protect their wellbeing, when you want to hang out with someone from the hospital (a colleague not patient), you can ask for it, but if they say no you can never ask again". then she went on to medical boundaries which pissed me off further because she was saying how you should not compliment or criticise a patient on their body. if my patient is a landwhale that will die of a heart condition or if its an anorexic under the hippocratic oath i will be bound to point out the risks, but apparently thats a breach of a core boundary.
she was then yapping about "the importance of being mindful while working with people of a different gender" to us of not accidentally touching them inappropriately while using a stethoscope, not asking people about their sex lives (if you're in medicine or if you've just been to a doctor, you'd know that under some circumstances a doctor NEEDS to ask his patient about their sex lives to assess their issue properly), and spent an hour of the lecture explaining how to report someone for misconduct, and gave us vignettes to work among groups of five to assess what's ok and what isn't ok. i did not speak to people in my group cause they were libtards so i just pretended to agree with whatever the fuck they said. i also had no interest in spending my brain power over this retard shit.
worst part was one of the vignettes was about a gay man coming in for a prostate exam. even the libtards of my group agreed that it should be okay to do it, considering the bloke has literally booked an appointment for the purpose, obviously he should be ok with it as he had specifically asked for it. when the confident chadlite in my group shared this answer her face turned weird and she said "so actually that is an example of something you should never do, considering the sexuality of the man is known, you must explain how it works first, ask for consent, ask him to get ready, ask for consent again, and check in on his well being after the examination is done. unless the sexuality of the man is confirmed to be purely heterosexual, it is not okay to assume a man is okay with getting a prostate exam even if he voluntarily asked for it".
what the actual fuck is this stupidity, especially coming from the mouth of "an expert". from her explanation, boundaries seem to be a concept that only applies to foids and gay men? it just confused me so much. also anything in between "" is her actual verbatim that i have copied from the lecture transcript.
ALSO BASED ON HER OWN LECTURE SHE VIOLATED A BOUNDARY OF MINE, SHE CORNERED ME AFTER THE LECTURE FOR NOT PARTICIPATING, ASKING ME MULTIPLE TIMES OVER IF I'VE "have a good understanding of everything we discussed today". i also told her that i was autistic after the second time she asked me and that's why i am silent. she said "i understand and appreciate you confiding in me but if you don't respond i will never know if you understand or not". my head was like bitch that is my boundary and according to your definition, you saying this is a violation of my boundary. i didnt feel any discomfort at that but according to everthing she said over the three hours, SHE BASICALLY VIOLATED MY BOUNDARY by pushing neurotypical standards on me even after i shared my disability. now can i play a reverse card and send her a strongly worded email saying this was unacceptable behaviour, citing her own points from the lecture slides? i am considering doing it, if i do write the email i will share it here before sending and update if she responds. im just terrified of it becoming a thing and that i would get in trouble with the university.
