Serious Do you think nature intends us to be monogamous?

[Deleted member 11032]

As I understand it there is a copious amount of research which shows the more partners a foid has the less likely she is able to pair bond with a man but by nature foids are hypergamas and men can theoretically impregnate plentiful women in a short space of time. Ergo do you think we are more inclined to be monogamous or polyamorous? I haven't formed a concrete opinion yet but I think both serve their purpose and it is ultimately down to the personality type of the individual.

 

[singularitymaxx]

were most likely imo to be hypergamous

women with ONE super alpha man

men with many women

Nature likely intended it this way so it would push us to breed the best of the best and survive

 

[SoCalSuifuel]

Nature doesn't intend anything. You think tape worms exist for any specific reason? Shit just happens because it does. Monogamy came into effect because of STDs and various other practical reasons. Doesn't matter for us, though, we're incels, our spiritual ancestors never reproduced.

 

[VisVoi]

Nature "intends" for us to be whatever increases our likelihood of survival and reproduction.

For females, this means using betas for resources while getting impregnated by alpha males.

 

[Six]

Nature doesn't intend anything. You think tape worms exist for any specific reason? Shit just happens because it does. Monogamy came into effect because of STDs and various other practical reasons. Doesn't matter for us, though, we're incels, our spiritual ancestors never reproduced.

High IQ

 

[Angus13]

were most likely imo to be hypergamous

women with ONE super alpha man

men with many women

Nature likely intended it this way so it would push us to breed the best of the best and survive

Bluepill nature-cel arguement, rape is "natural" too. Polygamy will inevitably lead to inbreeding which lowers the value of the damn offspring, look at the muslim world. Look at Mormons and basically every other polygamist society. This is what happens when an entire generation shares the same DNA as 20% of the previous one, everyone is more interrelated.

Point being just because something is "natural" does not mean it is good. We evolve as a species and as a society by challenging some natural laws (but this is an over-simplification as there are mutable and immutable laws).

 

[Deleted member 1252]

Nature doesn't intend anything. Chaos reigns.

 

[Zaetheus]

Yes, but many people will argue against this. Some religions such as Christianity,Catholics promote monogamous relationships with one wife and one husband. Other religions the man may have multiple wives but the women may not have multiple husbands

Nature doesn't intend anything. Chaos reigns.

 

[Deleted member 1060]

Humans are closely related to bonobos and chimps, so our sexuality should be very similar to them, i.e. men are ploygamous but women are far less (or not).

An alpha male bonobo keeps a harem of female bonobos, and female bonobos tend to be monogamous, but if the current alpha gets fucked up be a new alpha, all the females flock to the new one and completely forget about the previous pack leader. (hypergamy).

 

[Deleted member 10124]

Nature doesn't intend anything. You think tape worms exist for any specific reason? Shit just happens because it does. Monogamy came into effect because of STDs and various other practical reasons. Doesn't matter for us, though, we're incels, our spiritual ancestors never reproduced.

 

[Incellectual]

Nature doesn't intend anything. You think tape worms exist for any specific reason? Shit just happens because it does. Monogamy came into effect because of STDs and various other practical reasons. Doesn't matter for us, though, we're incels, our spiritual ancestors never reproduced.

 

[ShadowMonk]

Nature leans this way and that. Maybe in the future we will be purely monogamous like some bird species or we might become eusocial with a Queen Stacy, Drone Chads and Worker Soys. Who knows.

For now we are the cuck-primate. Constantly lying and deceiving; pretending to be serial monogamous.

I wish I was an Orangutan. The true incel-primate. Evolved to cope.

 

[Termus123]

I’d prolly fuck any Stacy who wanted my D so obvsly not instinctually monogamous but can’t say cuz didn’t happen, just how I feel.

 

[Incelazo]

were most likely imo to be hypergamous

women with ONE super alpha man

men with many women

Nature likely intended it this way so it would push us to breed the best of the best and survive

High IQ

 

[Mitgoo62]

As I understand it there is a copious amount of research which shows the more partners a foid has the less likely she is able to pair bond with a man but by nature foids are hypergamas and men can theoretically impregnate plentiful women in a short space of time. Ergo do you think we are more inclined to be monogamous or polyamorous? I haven't formed a concrete opinion yet but I think both serve their purpose and it is ultimately down to the personality type of the individual.

Humans did not evolve to be a sexually monogamous species, having one partner at a time isn't monogamy, it actually fits into the category of serial polygyny.

 

[Gokugetem]

We don't live in nature OP. We live in a supposedly structured society built over millennia, and that is being demolished by the "advancements" of the last 50 years or so.

And yes, society absolutely intended for us to be monogamous. Now we aren't and the effects are already apparent: Rampant feminism, massive shortages in "low status" skilled laborers (plumbers, electricians, welders, ect), the formation of the welfare state, the devaluation of men, ect.

I would argue it was our nature to build society from the get go, and if the reset button was pushed humans would eventually build a similiar society. But without society, no, monogamy probably isn't natural. Harems would form around Chad and hypergamy would run just as rampant as it does today. But rape would be just as natural, so most men would still get more sex/offspring than they do now.

 

[Mitgoo62]

I agree society intended us to be monogamous, but that is the same society who forced us to be Incels.

 

[PersonalityChad]

No.

 

[Gokugetem]

I agree society intended us to be monogamous, but that is the same society who forced us to be Incels.

Nope, most of us are incels because society is collapsing. What we have had for the last 30-40 years can't be called a stable, self-sustainable society by anyone with an iota of awareness and a triple digit IQ.