Yes, and the only reason it hasn't happened already is that large numbers of women have still never tried Tinder and therefore are unaware of how ridiculously inflated their SMV can become thanks to dating apps. Even with that taken into account, hypergamy is still becoming more extreme by the year and unless an unexpected shift occurs, we will soon reach the point where the median number of sexual partners a man has is less than 1.
The interesting thing will be when sexual inequality reaches the point where a majority of the men with guns (cops, soldiers, etc.) who enforce the status quo become incels. There will likely be similarities to the French and Russian revolutions - when inequality, economic or sexual, reaches the point where it affects large numbers of the enforcer class, said enforcers have a tendency to turn on their masters and join the revolutionaries. And just like Louis XVI and Nicholas II, the overlords won't see it coming. You'd think they'd know better - but then again, all their bleating about "learning from history" is just self-righteous, phony bullshit that they spew to make themselves look and feel "woke." They can't learn anything from history because they don't understand it - all they see is a one-dimensional simplistic line that they call "progress." They don't see ups and downs, they don't see complexities. The SJWs currently in power really are arrogant and delusional enough to think they'll rule forever (see Francis Fukuyama's "The End of History" for a pathetic and laughable demonstration of their hubris). If revolutions in France and Russia could topple monarchies that had ruled for a thousand years, what chance does the libtards' hollow, few decades old baby empire stand?
Gonna be fun to watch. One of the few positive things about being incel, about being at the bottom of society, is that we have nothing to lose. Normie problems are not our problems. When the privileged people start losing their shit, we'll just be watching with beer and popcorn.
