Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment Do you think enforced monogamy is a viable solution to inceldom?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 3497
  • Start date

Do you?


  • Total voters
    37
D

Deleted member 3497

VX
-
Joined
Jun 1, 2021
Posts
10,524
If you have any other solutions in mind, elab on them.
 
What exactly is enforced monogamy?
 
It’s not, because women will just choose to be alone rather than with some sub4 subhuman. If he’s rich, she will be with him and cuck him for Chad. Only solution is state-paid prostitution where taxpayers pay for them.
 
enforced monogamy won't work because women will still be hypergamous
I guess if they were literally slaves then maybe, but we'd also have to keep a high birthrate (for instance it won't save this generational cohort since there are less man than women)
the only real solution is to simply thanos snap 50% of the male population through abortion or eugenics but that's not really a solution now is it?
 
It’s not, because women will just choose to be alone rather than with some sub4 subhuman. If he’s rich, she will be with him and cuck him for Chad. Only solution is state-paid prostitution where taxpayers pay for them.
Foids were invented to fuck and have babies. They would eventually yield if Chad is not an option
 
Foids were invented to fuck and have babies. They would eventually yield if Chad is not an option
To normie? yes (while cheating with chad). To ugly subhumans? No
 
Life has historically always been suffering, do why are we still surprised it is today? Only normies are living a lie and compensating for their inferiority by hedonism and narcissism, and spreading the just world fallacy. Slavery used to be common and people used to exploit, abuse and torture each other. Not much has changed in essence
 
Enforced monogamy + female dependence on male breadwinner + arranged marriage...

If you have these three factors, you can create pretty much universal marriage. Back in the 15th century, 95% of women were married by the age of 25 years old, most of the 5% that weren't were prostitutes who married shortly after retirement whether at the age of 25 or at 30. 15th century Europe rarely allowed divorce or annulments even and certainly did not allow polygamy, at this point concubinage had been banned as well, so we can extrapolate from this that pretty much every man in the 15th century got married. Before marriage, most men lost their virginity to prostitutes.

The reason why enforced monogamy works is because it takes chad out of the dating pool. He is already married to a girl who expects him to stay faithful, and in the 15th century, if a guy was going to cheat on his wife he generally did it with a prostitute instead of another man's wife (since the man would probably beat him up if discovered). If all the chads are married, then women's hypergamous instincts will be forcefully repressed and they'll have to settle for their looks-match. With female dependence on male breadwinners, it makes it impossible for women to just choose not to marry anyone. If they depend on men's income, and are forced to settle for their looks match, then you should get a pretty even distribution. Mentalcels would cease to exist given that women couldn't be picky anymore about that, less attractive men with more money could get a girl who's more attractive then they are. Men who are violent criminals could be taken out of the dating pool entirely due to the stigma attached to their behavior and girls who seek out dominant bad boys are ruthlessly shamed in societies like that.
 
Yes and rmaking women property is the only way to solve it, with cucked laws and rights it's unfixable
 
I'm a huge supporter of monogamy.
Pro-eugenics feminists think human societies better thrive when the only people reproducing are Chad and his harem. If this was always the case, then K selection wouldn't exist. Plus in monogamous societies, high genetic quality individuals tend to marry each other anyways.
Monogamy and civilization go hand in hand.

Enforced monogamy + female dependence on male breadwinner + arranged marriage...

If you have these three factors, you can create pretty much universal marriage. Back in the 15th century, 95% of women were married by the age of 25 years old, most of the 5% that weren't were prostitutes who married shortly after retirement whether at the age of 25 or at 30. 15th century Europe rarely allowed divorce or annulments even and certainly did not allow polygamy, at this point concubinage had been banned as well, so we can extrapolate from this that pretty much every man in the 15th century got married. Before marriage, most men lost their virginity to prostitutes.

The reason why enforced monogamy works is because it takes chad out of the dating pool. He is already married to a girl who expects him to stay faithful, and in the 15th century, if a guy was going to cheat on his wife he generally did it with a prostitute instead of another man's wife (since the man would probably beat him up if discovered). If all the chads are married, then women's hypergamous instincts will be forcefully repressed and they'll have to settle for their looks-match. With female dependence on male breadwinners, it makes it impossible for women to just choose not to marry anyone. If they depend on men's income, and are forced to settle for their looks match, then you should get a pretty even distribution. Mentalcels would cease to exist given that women couldn't be picky anymore about that, less attractive men with more money could get a girl who's more attractive then they are. Men who are violent criminals could be taken out of the dating pool entirely due to the stigma attached to their behavior and girls who seek out dominant bad boys are ruthlessly shamed in societies like that.
High IQ post.
 
Lets say sex outside of marriage and divorce is strictly prohibited i would say low tier normies and up betabuxxers would benefit from it.
 
It’s not, because women will just choose to be alone rather than with some sub4 subhuman.
this unfortunately.
the blackpill is absolute and, in this reality, this is our fate
 
I'm a huge supporter of monogamy.
Pro-eugenics feminists think human societies better thrive when the only people reproducing are Chad and his harem. If this was always the case, then K selection wouldn't exist. Plus in monogamous societies, high genetic quality individuals tend to marry each other anyways.
Monogamy and civilization go hand in hand.


High IQ post.
Not even just feminists but also the kratocratic side of the right.

If you let chads have their harem though, you literally turn into Africa. Africa is a complete sexual free for all. Chads can have as many women as they want. The reason why Africa has so much rape is because its an adaptive strategy by African incels to cope with high rates of polygamy. African societies are what happens when society allows polygamy and doesn't bother to control women and chads' reproductive strategies. Its why African countries have high levels of rape, huge swaths of their population would be incels if not for their aggressive confidence when pursuing women.

The fact is though that the entire basis of civilization is built on defying the might makes right principle of nature and teaching humans to follow certain rules and cooperate so that we can live better. Letting the strongest man do whatever the fuck he wants and is capable of doing is antithetical to civilization and would turn us into Somalia.
 
Yes. It is the only viable solution which was known to work.
It’s not, because women will just choose to be alone rather than with some sub4 subhuman.
Maybe in jewdom(jewrope and jewnited states). Its not much of an "enforced" Monogamy if foids have a choice
Enforced monogamy + female dependence on male breadwinner + arranged marriage...

If you have these three factors, you can create pretty much universal marriage. Back in the 15th century, 95% of women were married by the age of 25 years old, most of the 5% that weren't were prostitutes who married shortly after retirement whether at the age of 25 or at 30. 15th century Europe rarely allowed divorce or annulments even and certainly did not allow polygamy, at this point concubinage had been banned as well, so we can extrapolate from this that pretty much every man in the 15th century got married. Before marriage, most men lost their virginity to prostitutes.

The reason why enforced monogamy works is because it takes chad out of the dating pool. He is already married to a girl who expects him to stay faithful, and in the 15th century, if a guy was going to cheat on his wife he generally did it with a prostitute instead of another man's wife (since the man would probably beat him up if discovered). If all the chads are married, then women's hypergamous instincts will be forcefully repressed and they'll have to settle for their looks-match. With female dependence on male breadwinners, it makes it impossible for women to just choose not to marry anyone. If they depend on men's income, and are forced to settle for their looks match, then you should get a pretty even distribution. Mentalcels would cease to exist given that women couldn't be picky anymore about that, less attractive men with more money could get a girl who's more attractive then they are. Men who are violent criminals could be taken out of the dating pool entirely due to the stigma attached to their behavior and girls who seek out dominant bad boys are ruthlessly shamed in societies like that.
This. This is what I've been saying all along.
 
It’s not, because women will just choose to be alone rather than with some sub4 subhuman. If he’s rich, she will be with him and cuck him for Chad. Only solution is state-paid prostitution where taxpayers pay for them.
Just arranged marriagemaxx
Enforced monogamy + female dependence on male breadwinner + arranged marriage...

If you have these three factors, you can create pretty much universal marriage. Back in the 15th century, 95% of women were married by the age of 25 years old, most of the 5% that weren't were prostitutes who married shortly after retirement whether at the age of 25 or at 30. 15th century Europe rarely allowed divorce or annulments even and certainly did not allow polygamy, at this point concubinage had been banned as well, so we can extrapolate from this that pretty much every man in the 15th century got married. Before marriage, most men lost their virginity to prostitutes.

The reason why enforced monogamy works is because it takes chad out of the dating pool. He is already married to a girl who expects him to stay faithful, and in the 15th century, if a guy was going to cheat on his wife he generally did it with a prostitute instead of another man's wife (since the man would probably beat him up if discovered). If all the chads are married, then women's hypergamous instincts will be forcefully repressed and they'll have to settle for their looks-match. With female dependence on male breadwinners, it makes it impossible for women to just choose not to marry anyone. If they depend on men's income, and are forced to settle for their looks match, then you should get a pretty even distribution. Mentalcels would cease to exist given that women couldn't be picky anymore about that, less attractive men with more money could get a girl who's more attractive then they are. Men who are violent criminals could be taken out of the dating pool entirely due to the stigma attached to their behavior and girls who seek out dominant bad boys are ruthlessly shamed in societies like that.
Based. Only system that works= monogamy with foids dependent on men to survive
 
Last edited:
Yes. It is the only viable solution which was known to work.

Maybe in jewdom(jewrope and jewnited states). Its not much of an "enforced" Monogamy if foids have a choice
Foids always had a choice. Places with forced marriages also usually means the man is forced to marry some random chick. And guess what, she will secretly fuck someone she is actually attracted to.
 
Foids always had a choice. Places with forced marriages also usually means the man is forced to marry some random chick. And guess what, she will secretly fuck someone she is actually attracted to.
I get where you're coming from. People who've never lived outside jewdom would never understand how every civilized society worked for hundreds of years before it was all plunged into madness
 
Cook up any dystopian scenario you want, it will never trump instincts. Normies and above aren't high inhib like incels and don't really care about the draconian laws you fantasize about. They'll do whatever they want regardless. And non-incel men really have no incentive to go along with anything you're suggesting.
 
I get where you're coming from. People who've never lived outside jewdom would never understand how every civilized society worked for hundreds of years before it was all plunged into madness
Cope, genetic testing and comparing to family trees shows that this has always been going on, and still goes on outside the west.
 
If you have any other solutions in mind, elab on them.
Yes its a viable solution, because it already was solving inceldom, the "patriarchal" norms of the past pretty much enforced monogamy indirectly because it prevented women from being able to work and own property, so every man was "dating up" from a woman's standpoint, so all men as a collective had a decent chance

Problem is there is no way to roll back the clock, the economy only works now because such a large population is taxable, and the elites would never let it go back even if they could restructure society to make it work like before
 
It’s not, because women will just choose to be alone rather than with some sub4 subhuman. If he’s rich, she will be with him and cuck him for Chad. Only solution is state-paid prostitution where taxpayers pay for them.
Based! Another solution would be excluding women from having any say in mating/sex whatsoever.
 
Last edited:
Yes it will be a good solution. To the people who say that she will still have a choice, enforced means that the foid will be forced. She is not going to be able to do anything about it.
 
interested profile picture :feelsdevil:
 

Similar threads

U
Replies
13
Views
424
UglyDumbass
U
brazi
Replies
18
Views
502
SociallyStupid
SociallyStupid
AsiaCel
Replies
6
Views
943
underballer
U
ALifeWastedOnRot
Replies
67
Views
2K
unionistcel
unionistcel
xyxx
Replies
33
Views
1K
xyxx
xyxx

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top