Did you forget to cite your "science" just now?
Here, let me do it. Btw I haven't seen her, or anyone ever, citing "science" that contradicts what incels say.
> Height
"From a genetic perspective height is an important signal of good genes. Taller men have been found to live longer than their shorter counter parts. This powerful combination of social and genetic advantages for the children of taller men provides a strong basis for expecting positive sexual selection pressure for height in humans. Sexual selection for height has been well documented in a host of cultures. This female preference for taller mates can also be observed across a range of cultures further supporting the hypothesis that it is an evolved psychological trait. This preference has ramifications in the quality and quantity of mates a male might have as well. Taller men are found to have ―prettier girlfriends, as defined by feminine characteristics such as desirable hip-to-waist ratios and skin quality. Taller men also have more long term and short term mates and have sex at earlier ages and later into life. Women’s preference for tall mates also increases during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle, when the probability of conception is greatest, which also argues for the adaptive origin of this preference."
Source
> Facial attractiveness
People's concepts of what they consider attractive varies greatly.
That is wishful thinking.
"Being more or less attractive has important social consequences and people do generally agree on who is and who is not attractive. Beauty is not just a simple social construct—attractiveness appears to be ingrained in our biology."
Source
"What makes a face attractive and why do we have the preferences we do? Emergence of preferences early in development and cross-cultural agreement on attractiveness challenge a long-held view that our preferences reflect arbitrary standards of beauty set by cultures.
Averageness,
symmetry, and
sexual dimorphism are good candidates for biologically based standards of beauty. A critical review and meta-analyses indicate that all three are attractive in both male and female faces and
across cultures. "
Source
Literally the next sentence:
Stereotipically "good-looking" people don't necessarily have an easier time getting laid.
Wait, stereotipically "good-looking"? I tought what is considered good looking varies greatly.
And yes, they do:
"
Face preferences affect a diverse range of critical social outcomes, from
mate choices and decisions about platonic relationships to hiring decisions and decisions about social exchange. Firstly, we review the facial characteristics that influence attractiveness judgements of faces (e.g. symmetry, sexually dimorphic shape cues, averageness, skin colour/texture and cues to personality) and then review several important sources of individual differences in face preferences (e.g. hormone levels and fertility, own attractiveness and personality, visual experience, familiarity and imprinting, social learning). The research relating to these issues highlights flexible, sophisticated systems that support and promote adaptive responses to faces that appear to function to
maximize the benefits of both our mate choices and more general decisions about other types of social partners."
Source
Especially for men, for women it doesn't even matter:
"For
men, the results show that
being unattractive decreases the likelihood of finding a partner, of finding a partner with a university degree, and of finding a partner with a higher educational level. For women, physical attractiveness does not affect the likelihood of any of those events occurring."
Source
"It was proposed that an individual would most often expect to date, would try to date, and would like a partner of approximately his own social desirability. In brief, we attempted to apply level of aspiration theory to choice of social goals. A field study was conducted in which individuals were randomly paired with one another at a "Computer Dance." Level of aspiration hypotheses were not confirmed. Regardless of S's own attractiveness, by far
the largest determinant of how much his partner was liked, how much he wanted to date the partner again, and how often he actually asked the partner out
was simply how attractive the partner was.
Personality measures such as the MMPI, the Minnesota Counseling Inventory, and Berger's Scale of Self- Acceptance and intellectual measures such as the Minnesota Scholastic Aptitude Test, and high school percentile rank
did not predict couple compatability.
The only important determinant of S's liking for his date was the date's
physical attractiveness."
Source
"The multiple motive hypothesis of physical attractiveness suggests that women are attracted to men whose appearances elicit their nurturant feelings, who appear to possess sexual maturity and dominance characteristics, who seem sociable, approachable, and of high social status. Those multiple motives may cause people to be attracted to individuals who display an optimal combination of
neotenous, mature, and expressive facial features, plus desirable grooming attributes. Three quasi-experiments demonstrated that men who possessed the neotenous features of
large eyes, the mature features of
prominent cheekbones and a large chin, the expressive feature of a
big smile, and high-status clothing were seen as more attractive than other men. Further supporting the multiple motive hypothesis, the 2nd and 3rd studies indicated that impressions of attractiveness
had strong relations with selections of men to date and to marry but had a curvilinear relation with perceptions of a baby face vs a mature face."
Source
please show me one academic source that implies that women have an easier time getting laid.
"Maybe
80 percent of women
reproduced, whereas only
40 percent of men did."
Source
"Once upon a time, 4,000 to 8,000 years after humanity invented agriculture, something very strange happened to human reproduction. Across the globe, for every 17 women who were reproducing, passing on genes that are still around today—only one man did the same."
Source
I don't think there are any academic sources on that because how would you measure how
easy it is for you to get laid? If you want to see how easy it is for women to get laid just take a look at one of a hundred Tinder experiments all with the same result.
