idk i just find it pointless to have a separate saves idk what's the reason even I only do it when I wanna try something to make sure my main save doesn't mess up.
Single save usually
I usually keep to like 3 saves unless it is a story game then I have a save at the start of each chapter along with my 3 saves
I always keep extra saves in case one gets corrupted.
Fallout and Elder Scrolls I have multiple saves any other game I just overwrite.
Typically I'll run 2 alternating saves incase one gets corrupted, if the autosaves are generous I might just have one manual save, and if the game is notorious for corrupting saves and crashing I'll use as many as I can.
single saves until I have to make an important choice ,then I split them
Same. Based strat.
Separate saves and if I'm doing a second run I go with one save because I already know all the events that'll happen.
i played Skyrim with only one save once and my save corrupted and nearly broke my PS3.
Separate saves. It makes replays and trophy/achievement hunting easier.
im too low iq to make separate saves
just playing the game for my incel life
just playing the game for my incel life
Separate
Single save. Havent played in years a game where separate save would mean something.
always single save
but if the game has no map or if its really hard, then two saves (but thats usually rare)
but if the game has no map or if its really hard, then two saves (but thats usually rare)
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
