I've seen this discussed many times before, and I'm just curious as to the reasoning behind answering any certain group above the others. People usually answer this based off of how they're treated, which ends up creating the hilariously ironic answers of "I hate chads and stacies the least because they treated me the nicest." I understand this answer, but I just find it funny how even on .is halo effect is strong JFL. They're only that nice because they have the privilege of being pleasant. They could present themselves as a doormat and people would still avoid stepping on them, would walk around them. Their positive reinforcement throughout their youth made them that way. They're just treating people how they were treated. Normies and beckies are unpleasant because they're bitter from years of cutthroat competition and will do anything to elevate their own status. Juggernauts are unpleasant because they are subconsciously well aware of their inflated status and therefore insecure.
If you're going to look at it rationally, there's no reason to hate any one of these groups more than the others. The only reason they treated you the way they did was because of their programming. 99.999...% of all humans will only act based on what they were programmed to do whether that's genetically or socially. Most people are unable to step out of their ego and practice introspection of the self. When normies simp over foids, they only do it because it's all they've ever known. It's not like it is a conscious decision, their brain doesn't work at that level. When foids' face contort into looks of disgust when they see us, it's simply a subconscious process. Sure they might consciously reject you, but almost everyone would do the same in their position.
