Discussion Do you consider eugenics evil?

[Mr.Breb]

The other day in a forum i gave a pro eugenics arguments.
I said that some people suffer a lot bc of things that could be easily predicted, and there were insults, people saying my opinion was "evil"
Why? i want to stop sufferment

Not only that. I consider people who are against my argument the actual evil people. It's a cruel act to have a kid who will be an incel

 

[Teru Mikami]

If you're a moralfag, then yes, eugenics is evil, but if you're going to be evil anyway, might as well exterminate every human and not only the dysgenic ones

At least that's the way I see it

 

[CosmicInjustice]

Not necessarily if dysgenic people aren’t harmed, just forbidden from bearing children. The eugenic families should subsidize dysgenic families not having children. Dysgenic families can even become adoptive parents, if they are of good character. Of course, these are ideal circumstances and the reality would almost inevitably be dystopian for dysgenic people.

 

[CosmicInjustice]

The most difficult part about eugenics would be to convince society that short women aren’t suitable biological mothers. That would be worse than the Holocaust for feminists, cucks, and simps.

 

[aryanmikmaq]

The other day in a forum i gave a pro eugenics arguments.
I said that some people suffer a lot bc of things that could be easily predicted, and there were insults, people saying my opinion was "evil"
Why? i want to stop sufferment

Not only that. I consider people who are against my argument the actual evil people. It's a cruel act to have a kid who will be an incel

Depends I support banning feminism and mass migration also increasing everyones genetics in a ideal society by forcing hot women to be with us so our offspring will be superior rather than just offing inferior people.

 

[Caichan]

yes because then i wouldn’t be able to breed

 

[MRHK_57]

Good idea, terrible execution. Nature doesn't care about the same traits we tend to prioritize. Eugenics programs are almost guaranteed to fail.

 

[DCI Gene Hunt]

Well yeah, obviously. Women practicing eugenics is the reason for our inceldom ffs. I CAN'T BREED!

 

[Mr.Breb]

Well yeah, obviously. Women practicing eugenics is the reason for our inceldom ffs. I CAN'T BREED!

Not that much, when they have sons is in their 30's. If they did since they actually begin fucking inceldom would have been wiped out.
And at that age bc marriage is monogamy activity and bc they have been for more than 15yrs raided by Chad they lower their standards. Maybe they don't settle with a truecel sub4 but they do with a nearcel with incel traits or even an incel ascends. They have kids and there it is new incel generation

 

[Lonely Slav]

Well yeah, obviously. Women practicing eugenics is the reason for our inceldom ffs. I CAN'T BREED!

They don't though? That "Foids are natural eugenicists" bullshit is literally a joke around here

 

[Emba]

Lack of eugenics is evil

 

[Mr.Breb]

Lack of eugenics is evil

Exactly

 

[neverleaveroomcel]

Lack of eugenics is evil

 

[DCI Gene Hunt]

Not that much, when they have sons is in their 30's. If they did since they actually begin fucking inceldom would have been wiped out.
And at that age bc marriage is monogamy activity and bc they have been for more than 15yrs raided by Chad they lower their standards. Maybe they don't settle with a truecel sub4 but they do with a nearcel with incel traits or even an incel ascends. They have kids and there it is new incel generation

Would the men of this forum get to breed under your definition of eugenics?

 

[DCI Gene Hunt]

They don't though? That "Foids are natural eugenicists" bullshit is literally a joke around here

And yet they reject you and me cos they regard our seed as genetically inferior. Incels supporting eugenics is like turkeys voting for an early Christmas.

 

[Mr.Breb]

Would the men of this forum get to breed under your definition of eugenics?

most of them not. Bc here there's lot of sub5 which don't get even to betabux. But it's true that there's a huge amount of incels and people who really rarely have sex in their youth which end up marrying at their 30s
I personally have seen lot of them irl. In fact i think my brother are ones

 

[DCI Gene Hunt]

most of them not. Bc here there's lot of sub5 which don't get even to betabux. But it's true that there's a huge amount of incels and people who really rarely have sex in their youth which end up marrying at their 30s
I personally have seen lot of them irl. In fact i think my brother are ones

Ffs so you don't want you and your fellow brocels to breed? So what would we do in a world where women abide by your definition of eugenics: just be happy with jerking off, have a vasectomy and marry our looksmatch, or do we get to marry Chad's ex once she runs out of eggs and is no longer breedable?

 

[Mr.Breb]

Ffs so you don't want you and your fellow brocels to breed? So what would we do in a world where women abide by your definition of eugenics: just be happy with jerking off, have a vasectomy and marry our looksmatch, or do we get to marry Chad's ex once she runs out of eggs and is no longer breedable?

i don't want them to breed bc this is how breeds works for an incel/nearcel:

You spend from teenage to your 30s alone, outcasted. Or really rarely having sex (nearcels). While foids fuck with chad non stop. This means that for 15-20 yrs you live in a hell, while they enjoy properly their teenage (heaven)

At 30, as marriage is monogamy in western, foids are distributed more equally. So you get married with a +400 bodycount foid. That foid has sons with you, and as you have bad genes your sons inherit it. Leading to another generation which which will live the same hell or worse

In other worsd incel is hell, incel life is bc of genes, if you wipe out the genes, there's no hell

 

[TheRotKing]

No, because women arent actually eugenic theyre dysgenic.

 

[EcstasyCel]

Depends on the type of eugenics.

Killing off retards against their will might be evil, however, making sure people breed in their late teens as nature intended is necessary and good.

 

[Uncle Death]

no, it is good and humane actually

 

[ivankz]

No.

 

[yeetbender_]

It's not really worth it if taken too far, but puttling limits on how many sons a father can have, should they be dysgenic, while not having any limits for the more eugenic groups, and mixing the excess of eugenic offspring with the now minimized amount of dysgenic offspring, and repeating until the dysgenic traits are removed (or just using crispr) is morally ok, however, things like completely blocking people for having kids IS IMMORAL.

 

[naturalselector2003]

The other day in a forum i gave a pro eugenics arguments.
I said that some people suffer a lot bc of things that could be easily predicted, and there were insults, people saying my opinion was "evil"
Why? i want to stop sufferment

Not only that. I consider people who are against my argument the actual evil people. It's a cruel act to have a kid who will be an incel

Stimulating or destimulating reproduction of certain people indirectly by taxes and laws — acceptable
Killings, poisoning, forced mutliation — evil

 

[WeirdoDesperado]

Modern day eugenics only lead to fisherian runaway and low-IQ mutts, whose careers are dealing drugs and mugging people. Female sexual selection can turn Switzerland into Haiti over time, when cucked soyciety gives women everything they want and protect them every possible way from their looksmatch.

Inceldom skyrockets, autism skyrockets, health problems too. Broken families, civilization collapsing due to thugmaxxer worship. This is what natural selection isn't supposed to be, it's man made because men chose to simp and whiteknight.

 

[InvoluntaryChigga]

A necessary evil that would've prevented my birth

 

[Mr.Breb]

A necessary evil that would've prevented my birth

That's why it's not evil. Evil is having an autistic, disabled ugly kid