Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Do you believe that white people are CULTURALLY superior to non-whites?

Are whites CULTURALLY superior to ethnics?


  • Total voters
    21
Moth

Moth

Enemy of the Mechanism
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 11, 2025
Posts
10,674
Online time
7d 6h
I recently posted a poll asking people if white people were GENETICALLY superior to non-whites (where culture obviously wasn't a factor) and the results were almost perfectly divided 50/50 (52.4% voted yes, 42.9% voted no, 4.8% said that it depended on the ethnicity). So I decided to create this poll where culture was the ONLY factor (and genetics is not a factor at all) in order to compare the results of both polls.

In this case, I'm defining whites as people if Western, Central and Northern European descent (in this case Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews will not be included as that will likely skew the results).

I'm defining culture as architecture, way of life, religion/ideology/philosophy, food, music etc. (basically anything about an ethnicity that isn't tied to their genes)

This forum is perceived as racist by many normies however the majority of criticism I've seen about ethnics on .is is in relation to them saying that ethnics practice an inferior culture, way of life, religion/ideology etc. as opposed to expressing that they are genetically inferior in terms of intelligence, strength and morality, this leads me to believe that a higher percentage of people will vote that white people are culturally superior than those who voted that white people were genetically superior.

Once again, this poll is about CULTURAL superiority, not genetic superiority.
 
I don't believe that White culture is superior toEast Asian culture; they are on the same tier.
 
Last edited:
I don't believe that white culture is superior to Asian culture; they are on the same tier.
Asia is a large continent, do you mean East Asia? This site has not been kind to the Arabs and South Asians
 
Asia is a large continent, do you mean East Asia? This site has not been kind to the Arabs and South Asians

Yes i mean East Asia
 
Eats Asia is good and some other ones aswell
 
White culture wasn't strong enough to survive the nigger rebellion of 1865 unfortunately. Now we got wiggers speaking monkey and toting glocks in streets.
 
no. whites are neoliberal
 
Of course! How in the fuck are niggers, beaners, and sand niggers culture superior to whites?
 
I recently posted a poll asking people if white people were GENETICALLY superior to non-whites (where culture obviously wasn't a factor) and the results were almost perfectly divided 50/50 (52.4% voted yes, 42.9% voted no, 4.8% said that it depended on the ethnicity). So I decided to create this poll where culture was the ONLY factor (and genetics is not a factor at all) in order to compare the results of both polls.

In this case, I'm defining whites as people if Western, Central and Northern European descent (in this case Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews will not be included as that will likely skew the results).

I'm defining culture as architecture, way of life, religion/ideology/philosophy, food, music etc. (basically anything about an ethnicity that isn't tied to their genes)

This forum is perceived as racist by many normies however the majority of criticism I've seen about ethnics on .is is in relation to them saying that ethnics practice an inferior culture, way of life, religion/ideology etc. as opposed to expressing that they are genetically inferior in terms of intelligence, strength and morality, this leads me to believe that a higher percentage of people will vote that white people are culturally superior than those who voted that white people were genetically superior.

Once again, this poll is about CULTURAL superiority, not genetic superiority.
Brother you're forgetting the key variable. Culture is a byproduct of genes genetics not only determine your skin colour but also iq behaviour pattern etc why do you think most rapists and terrorists are black and brown. White and yellow men Have much lower crime statistics then black and brown coz blacks and browns have inferior subhuman monkey genes. Similarly black and brown countries are underdeveloped and in those countries the lighter skin and caucasoid looking people are the pinnacle of society just look at media and culture they romanticised having fair skin and European features
 
I don't believe that White culture is superior toEast Asian culture; they are on the same tier.
East Asians are obviously high IQ. But their modern culture was shit until Yankland imposed western democracy on Japan after WW2. It's one of the few instances of Yankland successfully imposing democracy on a country.
 
Idgaf tbh. I never actually did. Let each race and ethnicity evolve at their own pace and leave them alone.
That's all I'm saying.

As an example of whites interfering in other peoples' affair I'd name Africa first and foremost.
Now Ii am not going to talk about the supposed exploitation as fellow blacks have participated in that as well and sold their own out and still do to this day.

What I want to talk about are all these alteuistic programs, like building water filter stations for them and teaching them how to build them on their own, how to maintain them etc. .

That will not help them, imo. Africa is like that pampered, spoiled child which never grows up because the parents won't allow it to make mistakes.

Now, the Europeans have gone through some serious shit and used to live just like third world shitholers.
But what has changed? How did they succeed? How did they become a first world people?

Through trial and error, through wars, famines, pain and suffering, political turmoil.
There weren't no african or asian Samaritans who constantly handed them gibsmedats.

No, in order to survive and improve they have had to learn from their mistakes. That combined with the harsher climate has forced them to evolve.

If we truely wanted other races to succeed we'd cut ALL help to them and just do strict trading instead.
Every time they'd experiience some natural disaster, we shouldn't help them at all.

Let them figure out how to prevent severe damage from such disasters. Let them figure out how to build safer houses. Let them figure out proper healthcare and agriculture.

You learn best and most when you are allowed to make mistakes and make them.

Everybody here who has a profession or two knows this.
 
East Asians are obviously high IQ. But their modern culture was shit until Yankland imposed western democracy on Japan after WW2. It's one of the few instances of Yankland successfully imposing democracy on a country.
Fuck US democracy. LoL
 
Well.... "white" culture, as you define it has lead to the scientiifc method and by extension almost all technological advancements we have today. That being said it also birthed feminism, equity, faggotry and liberalism.

So it is a question of what you value more, science or the end of the patriarchy.

I'd say that every culture can and should be criticized, white culture has done some very very goof things and some very very bad, catastrophally bad things. The world wars did not start in Arabia, but in western Europe so.... to me at least, even if non european cultures are les intellectually developed at least they didn't invent feminism. Anything is better than that cancer.
 

Similar threads

AutismKing
Replies
47
Views
2K
fatecel
fatecel
whiteboyhair
Replies
52
Views
3K
Brainy
Brainy
ANTAGONIST
Replies
22
Views
1K
Zionist
Zionist

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top