Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Do you believe modern society is too hypersexualized?

title

  • No, and that’s a good thing

    Votes: 2 4.5%
  • No, and that’s a bad thing

    Votes: 2 4.5%
  • Yes, and that’s a good thing

    Votes: 3 6.8%
  • Yes, and that’s a bad thing

    Votes: 37 84.1%

  • Total voters
    44
Excalibur

Excalibur

You’re all gonna die
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 23, 2024
Posts
9,646
Online time
20h 45m
1763250964659

IMG 3719



Crazy to think that not too long ago this shit wouldn’t have been tolerated. At this rate, the word obscenity might become an archaism.
 
yes and it sucks soyciety is rubbing it in our faces how cool sex is and that you cant have it fucking bullshit
 
Definitely!!! I swear far in the past, sex was something nobody really talked about outside of the bedroom.
 
I mean, I automatically internally sexualize any female i’m attracted to I see in public, so i’m happy I can access things like Pornography for instant gratification in the midst of my undesirableness.
 
I’ll say it’s bad because it takes away the novelty and magic of it. Feels raunchier when it’s kept in private.
 
yes and it sucks soyciety is rubbing it in our faces how cool sex is and that you cant have it fucking bullshit
Assuming your username is accurate, it’s more brutal for doll fuckers because they’re at the halfway point of having an idea of what pussy is like but not feeling the true warmth of a real woman.
 
Yeah there's naked whores everywhere for Chad
 
1000%. It isn't a very good thing.
 
It would be nice if people were actually allowed to enjoy the hypersexualised society without feeling like it's *Perverted* to do so.
 
the porn industry has created the idea that being a whore is "empowering" and now everyone suffers the consequences
 
Western society is undoubtedly hypersexualized, particularly women. But the blame lies not with the porn industry, but with feminism. Traditionally, in Western society (conservative and Christian), it is men who have played their social role in the public sphere (as holders of political power and as those responsible for providing financially for their families), while the social role of women has been confined to the private or family sphere (as housewives and caregivers). Unlike men, women have always been concerned about their physical appearance, since, in order to find the most suitable partner, what a man looks for in a woman is fertility (which is a physical-sexual characteristic). Women, on the other hand, value a man's ability to protect them (physically and financially). With the emergence of feminism in Western society, traditional (Christian) gender roles have been blown apart. The wall that kept women protected within the family sphere has fallen, and women have entered public life, with all that this implies in a liberal-capitalist society such as the Western one. Traditionally, once married, women only had to worry about looking beautiful for their husbands. Now, under the guise of false “sexual empowerment,” women have been doubly deceived: on the one hand, feminist liberalism has told them that they can do whatever they want with their bodies and that there will be no consequences; and, on the other hand, capitalism has turned women's bodies and sexuality into a market commodity, which is closely related to their hypergamy. And in recent decades, this trend has been accelerating, leading to the hypersexualization of society as a whole. Before women entered the public sphere and gained their false “sexual empowerment,” men's bodies and sexuality had never been of social interest, let alone had any market value. It has been since the “sexual empowerment” of women, the commodification of their sexuality, and their hypergamy that some men (all Chads, logically) have reoriented their sexual strategy by exhibiting their bodies on social media, thus joining this hypersexualizing trend.

In case it isn't clear, and as I said in a previous post, I am in favor of what some define as “traditional gender roles,” which, honestly, I don't think is a bad definition, although I prefer to call it the Natural Order of Things. I am in favor of a Christian and conservative society in which women devote themselves to having children, taking care of the household, caring for the family, obeying their husbands, and keeping their mouths shut. I don't like today's society. I don't like women having the same rights as men. I detest women's hypergamy with all my soul. I don't like women dressing like whores (and nowadays it's hard to find a woman who doesn't dress like that). I like women to dress in a feminine but modest way, and reserve their sexuality for their husbands. If Sydney Sweeney were my wife, of course, I wouldn't have allowed her to leave the house dressed like that, if necessary “with a couple of slaps.” In 2019, I worked for a few months at a high-end restaurant as a substitute. One day, two middle-aged couples came in for dinner. They were very elegant. Throughout the entire dinner, it was practically only the men who spoke; the women hardly said anything. It was a rather boring conversation. They talked mainly about business, but at one point during the evening I caught a comment made by one of the men: “Sometimes you have to slap your wife a couple of times to make her see reason.” The phrase stuck with me because of the naturalness with which he said it, but what surprised me most was the response of the other diners. Both the other man and the two women nodded in agreement, and the person who had uttered the phrase continued the conversation as if nothing had happened. No one was shocked. And this was in 2019, not the 1950s. This is the kind of marriage I would like to have, but Sydney Sweeney is not my wife, and I will never even have a wife.

You can accuse me of being contradictory or hypocritical. I don't care. I truly believe everything I've said, but even though we do live in a hypersexualized society, I'm fine with that. I'm an incel in this modern hypersexualized society, and I would be one in a hypothetical Christian and conservative society too. I'll always be an incel, and I'll never be able to fondle Sydney Sweeney's tits (or any other woman's). So why should I care if she dresses like a slut? I think she's degrading herself by dressing like that, but that's not my problem. And since I'm not going to be able to fondle her tits, or lick them, etc., what's the problem if I jerk off looking at a picture of her? I wish she were naked and not wearing that see-through dress. I'm in favor of porn because I'm an incel. It's my way of venting about my shitty life. What's the problem? I know it's pathetic, that it's a shitty cope, but that's how it is. If I weren't an incel, I wouldn't have to jerk off to porn, I'd fuck my girlfriend, but it turns out I don't have a girlfriend. So what's the problem? The hypersexualization of women isn't my problem, it's fine with me.​
 
Western society is undoubtedly hypersexualized, particularly women. But the blame lies not with the porn industry, but with feminism. Traditionally, in Western society (conservative and Christian), it is men who have played their social role in the public sphere (as holders of political power and as those responsible for providing financially for their families), while the social role of women has been confined to the private or family sphere (as housewives and caregivers). Unlike men, women have always been concerned about their physical appearance, since, in order to find the most suitable partner, what a man looks for in a woman is fertility (which is a physical-sexual characteristic). Women, on the other hand, value a man's ability to protect them (physically and financially). With the emergence of feminism in Western society, traditional (Christian) gender roles have been blown apart. The wall that kept women protected within the family sphere has fallen, and women have entered public life, with all that this implies in a liberal-capitalist society such as the Western one. Traditionally, once married, women only had to worry about looking beautiful for their husbands. Now, under the guise of false “sexual empowerment,” women have been doubly deceived: on the one hand, feminist liberalism has told them that they can do whatever they want with their bodies and that there will be no consequences; and, on the other hand, capitalism has turned women's bodies and sexuality into a market commodity, which is closely related to their hypergamy. And in recent decades, this trend has been accelerating, leading to the hypersexualization of society as a whole. Before women entered the public sphere and gained their false “sexual empowerment,” men's bodies and sexuality had never been of social interest, let alone had any market value. It has been since the “sexual empowerment” of women, the commodification of their sexuality, and their hypergamy that some men (all Chads, logically) have reoriented their sexual strategy by exhibiting their bodies on social media, thus joining this hypersexualizing trend.​
Man, you could make a separate post about this, because you seem to have thought this through. I expect few people are going to read through this in the comments
 
yes and it sucks soyciety is rubbing it in our faces how cool sex is and that you cant have it fucking bullshit
if ww3 ever happens
 
i don't think it's hypersexualized enough
 
Sydney sweeney is my looksmatch without fakeup


Ugly
 
glad to see the users in this forum have actually voted smartly for once
 
We’re used to it at this point.
 
And if you look, they will call you a pervert.
 

Similar threads

Sir Silentium
Replies
14
Views
162
Kent88
K
coursehawk69
Replies
8
Views
553
SewerGoat
SewerGoat
dipenhydramine
Replies
13
Views
324
dipenhydramine
dipenhydramine
K
Replies
9
Views
283
SubhumanOldcel
SubhumanOldcel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top