Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Do you believe life is deterministic

I believe in

  • Determinism

    Votes: 12 60.0%
  • Compatibilism

    Votes: 6 30.0%
  • Purely free will

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 2 10.0%

  • Total voters
    20
  • Poll closed .
Dude420

Dude420

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Jul 23, 2018
Posts
368
Determinism: all events, including human action, are ultimately determined by causes external to the will. Some philosophers have taken determinism to imply that individual human beings have no free will and cannot be held morally responsible for their actions.

Compatibilism is the belief that free will and determinism are mutually compatible and that it is possible to believe in both without being logically inconsistent. Compatibilists believe freedom can be present or absent in situations for reasons that have nothing to do with metaphysics.

Free will is the ability to choose between different possible courses of action unimpeded. Free will is closely linked to the concepts of responsibility, praise, guilt, sin, and other judgements which apply only to actions that are freely chosen.
 
Yes I am determined to go to Japan and ascend so I will.
 
believing in purely free will is :feelsautistic::feelsautistic::feelsautistic:
and not the kind that makes you good with numbers
 
Yes I am determined to go to Japan and ascend so I will.
Haha
 
If you made a computer that can calculate in every variable, a perfect supercomputer with the sole intenton to predict outcomes, it would be able to predict every action anyone will take for the rest of their life because it can take in every aspect of your personality. More than that it would predict the movement of every atom and subatomic particle for the rest of existance.
The mere existance of rules and laws that govern our universe imply that there are absolutes and if there are absolutes that would mean that the begining of existance is like a y=x*3 type equation by which every x will be already determined from negative to positive infinity, we all just experience different x's for a brief period. That being said I think that believing in free will is in human nature so I guess I'm a compatibilist.
 
If you made a computer that can calculate in every variable, a perfect supercomputer with the sole intenton to predict outcomes, it would be able to predict every action anyone will take for the rest of their life because it can take in every aspect of your personality. More than that it would predict the movement of every atom and subatomic particle for the rest of existance.
The mere existance of rules and laws that govern our universe imply that there are absolutes and if there are absolutes that would mean that the begining of existance is like a y=x*3 type equation by which every x will be already determined from negative to positive infinity, we all just experience different x's for a brief period. That being said I think that believing in free will is in human nature so I guess I'm a compatibilist.

This is just our mind tricking us into believing we have agency over our actions, your actions are still nonetheless deterministic, it is just an illusory adaptive mental bias. If you believe a supercomputer can predict the future you are a determinist.
 
Last edited:
Indeterminism and the non-existence of free will are not incompatible with each other.

The universe is at the very least subjectively indeterministic as a result of the laws of quantum mechanics. If the many-worlds interpretation is correct, then the universe has a single wave function that evolves deterministically, which means that every possible configuration of the universe is realized in at least one timeline; however, the time-evolution of the universe would be indeterministic to individuals in any given branch, hence subjective indeterminism.
 
Indeterminism and the non-existence of free will are not incompatible with each other.

The universe is at the very least subjectively indeterministic as a result of the laws of quantum mechanics. If the many-worlds interpretation is correct, then the universe has a single wave function that evolves deterministically, which means that every possible configuration of the universe is realized in at least one timeline; however, the time-evolution of the universe would be indeterministic to individuals in any given branch, hence subjective indeterminism.

Every possible configuration; what number of configuration seems most probable to you following your logic or is it infinite?
 
Every possible configuration; what number of configuration seems most probable to you following your logic or is it infinite?

If time proceeds infinitely, then the total number of possible events is infinite, hence the total number of events that happens is infinite (since every possible event occurs in at least one timeline), hence the number of timelines is infinite.
 
If time proceeds infinitely, then the total number of possible events is infinite, hence the total number of events that happens is infinite (since every possible event occurs in at least one timeline), hence the number of timelines is infinite.

And how some form of free will manifest itself in your theory?
 
And how some form of free will manifest itself in your theory?

I never claimed that it does. Re-read my original post. Indeterminacy and the existence of free will are not equivalent.

In fact, the MWI negates free will. If you take choice A in one universe, there's another universe where you took choice B.
 
The high IQ of this forum is even higher than I expected.
 
I voted for compatibalisim but there are some cases in which determinism completely controls an individuals life
 
Compatibilism = cope. Determinism negates free will - these 2 concepts cannot exist at same time.
 
Determinism: all events, including human action, are ultimately determined by causes external to the will. Some philosophers have taken determinism to imply that individual human beings have no free will and cannot be held morally responsible for their actions.

Compatibilism is the belief that free will and determinism are mutually compatible and that it is possible to believe in both without being logically inconsistent. Compatibilists believe freedom can be present or absent in situations for reasons that have nothing to do with metaphysics.

Free will is the ability to choose between different possible courses of action unimpeded. Free will is closely linked to the concepts of responsibility, praise, guilt, sin, and other judgements which apply only to actions that are freely chosen.

Walter os wet
 
I would define myself as a determinist. However, it depends on what form of determinism we're defining. Biological determinism is the true form of determinism. It's responsible for every moral resolution and set of ideas that encompass humankind.
 
Yes. Your genes are your destiny.
 
It’s better for your health if you believed you had some control over your destiny.
 
No clue man, It's foolish to believe in any of the three options as we no nothing of this world.
 
As of now adays I’d say deterministic.
 

Similar threads

To koniec
Replies
26
Views
450
Emba
Emba
Moroccancel
Replies
7
Views
260
Shitskin=Shitlife
S
Jailbaitmaxxer
Replies
31
Views
788
The Scarlet Prince
The Scarlet Prince
light
Replies
10
Views
631
light
light

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top