In case you didn't know, it means that the top 80% of women go for the top 20% of men.
Last edited:
No, because the top 20% men are not interested in the bottom 70%. Why should they fuck uglier girls if they can get the best ones?
The bottom 70% can only dream about those top 20% men and have to do it with lower guys. If I walk in the streets I see many average guys with average women. And I even see guys that are much uglier than me with a decent girl.
The problem we are facing is that we are in a group of 10% guys that are a sort of outcasts because we never got the chance to develop some sex-appeal.
The bottom 70% can only dream about those top 20% men and have to do it with lower guys. If I walk in the streets I see many average guys with average women. And I even see guys that are much uglier than me with a decent girl.
The problem we are facing is that we are in a group of 10% guys that are a sort of outcasts because we never got the chance to develop some sex-appeal.
The fuck was that
They're still going for the top 20% though. The lower 70% might be suitable for a hookup but not what they want for commitment. I know a girl like this... she gets desperate and spends a few hours on Tinder to find someone to meet her needs but in terms of her actual effort.. it all goes to the top 20%.
I believe in AMOG. So depending on the circumstances it could be the 99.99/.001% rule
yes anything below the top 20% is settling for femoids.
No, it's 90/10.
i dont know if we are at 80/20 yet but i believe we are getting there yes.
hypergamy is rife.
hypergamy is rife.
All the women want to fuck chad
All the women want chad
You’re an ugly pervert you can’t get shit in this world work for your afterlife cuz that’s the only hope left
All the women want chad
You’re an ugly pervert you can’t get shit in this world work for your afterlife cuz that’s the only hope left
We would fuck the top 20% also if we could. But we can only dream about it and the lowest 70% women also.
I know many ugly guys in the town where I grown up that do fuck the lower 70% of the women. Just because they have a big mouth and they humiliate other people to impress. Being an asshole is a good way tot get the lower 70%.
Ya, no, I get ya. My main point though is her behavior certainly reflects the image posted by OP.
I
The 80/20 rule is law. Denying the 80/20 rule is like denying that the Earth is Round.
Among our generation at least.
Then it is a 100/20 rule for both sekses. Everyone is wishing for the hottes chicks/boys.
But for 70% of the women it is only in their dreams. A top 20 guy is not wasting his time and reputation fucking them.
Probably true.
It's more like 99/1 theory in the age of Tinder.
The Pareto Principle isn't a theory so much as a demonstrable fact.
i think it's more of a 60/40 rule
I mostly do, but I think it's slightly different in reality, but there's still no doubt in mind that below average women have much more smv than below average men.
Stacey: tutorial mode
average female: babby mode
below average female: easy
Chad: normal
average male: hard
ugly male: nightmare mode
Either way, sub 4 men are almost always ignored by women and I strongly believe that the only way to have sex with 3/10+ women if you're sub 4 is to have money and or power/influence. Sub 4 women can still have sex not only with their looksmatch, but also with average and even above average males, although I believe that sub 4 women can almost never get a 7.5/10+ guy. It happens, but not as often as we'd like to believe it does.
Stacey: tutorial mode
average female: babby mode
below average female: easy
Chad: normal
average male: hard
ugly male: nightmare mode
Either way, sub 4 men are almost always ignored by women and I strongly believe that the only way to have sex with 3/10+ women if you're sub 4 is to have money and or power/influence. Sub 4 women can still have sex not only with their looksmatch, but also with average and even above average males, although I believe that sub 4 women can almost never get a 7.5/10+ guy. It happens, but not as often as we'd like to believe it does.
80/20 rule is FACT among college aged people. Well, at least the 20 part. I think it's more like 60/20 in actuality.
I believe in the 99/1 rule. Anything else is cope
G
Maybe not the exact numbers but of course, a minority of the guys get a majority of the women. It makes perfect sense evolutionarily.
I agree with that chart in the sense that a lot of men aren't getting any sex, but it isn't going to the top males. The average male basically fucks all the women. The below average to ugly male fucks no women.
It's more like 95/5. And those numbers and slowly becoming more and more marginalised each and every day.
no, maybe 10 years ago it was 80/20. I don´t believe for a second that women swipe right on 1 out of 5 guys on tinder. I´ve seen it with my own eyes.
Nowadays it´s more like 99/1. Roughly one guy out of 100 is close to male model tier. It´s not enough to be good looking nowadays. You literally need to be Nick Bateman tier to get attraction from women, purely based on looks nowadays.
Nowadays it´s more like 99/1. Roughly one guy out of 100 is close to male model tier. It´s not enough to be good looking nowadays. You literally need to be Nick Bateman tier to get attraction from women, purely based on looks nowadays.
They go for top 20% but can settle for less if you have other redeeming qualities like money, status and personality ( 
). One thing's for sure though, unless you're in that 20% you can be damn sure she's dreaming about those guys and would cheat on/dump you for them in a heartbeat. That's what 80/20 means to me.
). One thing's for sure though, unless you're in that 20% you can be damn sure she's dreaming about those guys and would cheat on/dump you for them in a heartbeat. That's what 80/20 means to me.
I want to believe that but I've seen far too many meh looking dudes with good looking women . Honestly it spikes my cortisol levels when I see it. When I see chads with stacies it doesn't surprise me at all. But when I see 5/10 guys with hot bitches, I wan't to go er.
I Think you take Tinder too seriously. This app sells illusions to women and not more than that.
Those average women can only dream about getting fucked by the top 1% men. A guy in that group shout have a burnout in a week if he had to fuck all of them. An why should he waste his energy for average women if he can get the top ones?
These woman usualy get fucked by alpha males, "interesting" hecklers in sports/music or assholes that have a brutal way of doing, sometimes it doesn't even matter how ugly they are. We are just normal boring pussies for them that are put away as unsexy.
Those average women can only dream about getting fucked by the top 1% men. A guy in that group shout have a burnout in a week if he had to fuck all of them. An why should he waste his energy for average women if he can get the top ones?
These woman usualy get fucked by alpha males, "interesting" hecklers in sports/music or assholes that have a brutal way of doing, sometimes it doesn't even matter how ugly they are. We are just normal boring pussies for them that are put away as unsexy.
I suppose so. There is an abundance of cucks and beta orbiters who need to be taken into account too, so, maybe my 95/5 statement was a bit over-exaggerated.
Yes, while it's obvious that the 80% of females are attracted to the 20% of men, sometimes they will search for the 30% or 40% of men if they cannot find chad
No, 80/20 is too low/high
It should be 95/5, maybe even 195/5
It should be 95/5, maybe even 195/5
Similar threads
Verilion
Users who are viewing this thread
