Serious poll
He could exist, but he is a cunt that deserves 1,000 years as an incel on Earth.
I have faith. I believe he exists. He just didn't make me Chad
Im atheist, religion is a gigacope
Honestly don't care in the slightest, no fucks given.
Logical answer is obviously no.
Logical answer is obviously no.
B
Biased poll is biased.
Also, yes.
Also, yes.
M
I don't think God exists.
I think A god exists. I am unsure if he's the version whites claim to exist. Or any other culture for that matter.
Yes, his son was Jesus Christ.
No
D
I think he does but he's hardly what the Bible and shit talk about.
P
I don't believe in God, I'm an atheist.
I chose the second option because I can't say for sure. If he does exist then he's a lazy sociopath who doesn't love everyone equally.
I chose the second option because I can't say for sure. If he does exist then he's a lazy sociopath who doesn't love everyone equally.
Last edited:
Cucked retarded is cucked
I'm not clicking the poll because you made the option demeaning but yes. It's not about coping either. Religious people who cope try to pretend they're volcel because of it.
God created us so he could laugh at our suffering
Religion is a cope for the unfortunate and ultimately preaches these narratives of false hope for genetic inferior guys like us. Personally I think its a bunch of fairy tale garbage
However, if there is a god then I fucking hate him for making me look the way I do
However, if there is a god then I fucking hate him for making me look the way I do
I believe in based Islam for obvious reasons
B
This usual brand of atheist arrogance is tiresome. You're not "free" or any smarter because you disbelieve in God.
I may not be free, but I am atleast freer than you. Also, if it weren't for retarded religious people sprouting their bullshit everywhere, atheism wouldn't even have to be a word.
B
A great irony is that this is a conviction you hold. You simply have faith that this is true.
There was a study done a while ago (around 10 years, I think) on the brain activity and emotional responses of both believers and non-believers. The participants would be exposed to certain words and their fMRI scans would be recorded as well as verbal accounts of their emotional state in response to seeing the word.
Responses were as you would expect across both groups for faith-neutral words. When the word "God" was displayed, however, the believers showed signs of relaxation and reported feelings of peace and serenity. Disbelievers, on the other hand, showed increased anxiety and stress in their neural activity and reported negative feelings (I can't remember the words they used).
So, ironically, the purportedly more rational group showed (irrationally) more signs of negative emotional affect. I'm sort of seeing the same phenomenon play out in your post here (KEK).
Religion is the biggest fucking cope ever made.
god is omnipotent.there is no reason for him to keep things that he hates around.if he didn't love you he would have destroyed you in less then a second.
P
Then why does hell exist?
A person that is just has to give a just treatment to those who do not obey the law(the law of god in this case).Those that are in hell are there because god is just and rewards or punishes as he sees fit(he is the most intelligent being imaginable).
I don't know tbh
P
Infinite punishment for finite sin? That's intelligent? Especially when he never told us which religion is the right one? nah.....
Doesn’t Hell Make God an Unjust Tyrant?
For many people, the Catholic doctrine of hell serves as an obstacle to belief in God. They think an all-good God wouldn’t allow someone he loves to experience everlasting torment. And they think the permanent nature of hell’s punishment is incompatible with a just God. A recent caller on...
When it comes to the question of which religion is the right one,one needs to pay attention to the fact that god wants man to follow him.In this regard god will have of necessity make his *religion* so to speak be better then anything comparable even if those other religions possess some form of truth.God and his religion must of necessity have the highest amount of truth when compared to everything else.god and wisdom are one and we catholic christians believe that catholic christianity is the true religion due to it's wisdom and miracles.
Last edited:
P
Doesn’t Hell Make God an Unjust Tyrant?
For many people, the Catholic doctrine of hell serves as an obstacle to belief in God. They think an all-good God wouldn’t allow someone he loves to experience everlasting torment. And they think the permanent nature of hell’s punishment is incompatible with a just God. A recent caller on...catholicexchange.com
it's not that simple.
"If the duration of punishment had to correspond to the duration of an offense, then it would be unjust to give a murderer a prison sentence any longer than the time it took for the murderer to kill his victim."
This is ridiculous shitty fallacious logic. They're setting up a strawman argument. BS
he is answering your objection.You think that our *finite sin* is nothing big while in reality the severity of our sin is huge.Hell is reserved for those where there is no coming back and no form of redemption is possible.A man that eternally goes against god must of necessity suffer for all eternity,for god is the ultimate good and going against him is so to speak diving into the abyss of unhappiness and sin
every doubt you have has been answered already hundreds of years ago and a lot of the time more then that.
P
No he answered it by setting up a strawman, saying that if you murder someone then the time should be the same as the murder, "but no, that logic is flawed." That's a strawman. Not only that, he talks about a kid who ditched school only getting a timeout for 10 minutes.
This whole paper is about countering shitty arguments that he made up. That's the definition of strawman fallacy!
i think we are close to derailing our conversation.Was my answer regarding your question about eternal hell being just satisfactory?
P
Nope, not at all. Especially because God never proved himself to exist in the first place. Check out this picture:
Genuinely not sure. I like the inclusion of religion in society, though. Slowly establishing a theocracy over time will fix all of our problems.
your problem is that you don't seem to put some confidence on objective good and objective evil.that picture is the epitome of *bro,how can i know lmao*.God has given you miracles,philosophical proofs,the holy spirit etc etc.if you have gone through them and said *okay,all of this is retarded* then i beg you to enlighten man for clearly you possess something that is greater then what all wise man have found.
P
I haven't seen any phiolsophical proofs tbh. If God appeared before me then yeah, I'd believe it. But I guess he works in "mysterious ways...."
God litterreally does not make any sense.
I prefer to believe in the annunaki and the sumerian tablets.
As i said before,read the last superstition if you want to received philosophical proofs.It might be hard to understand but just go through it and if you have questions ask someone.
this is one of the proofs he talks about in more detail.
Attachments
Then make serious options, phaggot.
This shit is so bad it has to be designed
Based quoteThis shit is so bad it has to be designed
i like the idea of religion as a means of controlling people, but i don't actually care whether there is one or not and if i had to bet money on it, i'd bet it on him not exiting.
M
The older I am the more atheist I get
D
Completely agree, this is some sadistic loosh-farm type shit in action, probably, JFL.
Is he a benevolent god? Which religion?
What incel even belives in god though, if he exist though he owes me lots of things ngl
The universe requires a god in order for it to have formed.
"You believe that you ate a banana for breakfast but you don't know if it actually was mentapsychobiochemultrahyperlogically a quantum apple, checkmate gaytheists!"
Wow who would have guessed that a group which associated god with good things felt good and a group which associated god with bad things felt bad
I didn't say non-believers are more rational, neither am I "shwoing (irrattionally) more signs of negative emotional affect". Quit the soylent fag
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
