Yeah more or less but it's more about sheer adaptability than pure strenght ( 6'7 roidcel might die young )
I didn't disagree with you but it's clear roids have negative impact on health
i c
R
all i needed is for one ancestor to rope before they bred
all i needed is for one ancestor to rope before they bred
I should've never been born.
Severely oversimplified at the very best (after of course not taking the words literally). They usually do this with anime villains, right, give them a one-dimensional little ideology that is then "disproved" (anecdotally) by the hero.
I dont. I believe the world is big enough for everyone.
not entirely
www.upi.com
Cavemen took care of physically disabled - UPI Archives
In their prehistoric struggle for survival, cavemen still managed to care for members of their community too disabled to forage and hunt with the clan,...
www.upi.com
Then why do different conflicting demographics become embroiled in zero sum games?
Altruism with your friends, no mercy with your enemiesnot entirely
Cavemen took care of physically disabled - UPI Archives
In their prehistoric struggle for survival, cavemen still managed to care for members of their community too disabled to forage and hunt with the clan,...
not entirely
Cavemen took care of physically disabled - UPI Archives
In their prehistoric struggle for survival, cavemen still managed to care for members of their community too disabled to forage and hunt with the clan,...
Because they choose to and rest follow like sheep. World and rules are build by humans. Borders are made by humans, resources are gathered and divided by humans. Greediness i guess.
@shishiowasright
You will be kind and merciful to people you like and hateful and harsh on those you dislike. You will shelter and provide for the weak of your clan even if you come out on a loss, but may be merciless against those of another. Most normal people hate when companies aren't consumer-friendly and focus entirely on profit, even though that is the objective best course of action for any company in regards to generating revenue. Then again this mostly comes out in the bigger picture, when it comes down to an individual level you can be treated like shit for something as minor as not conforming, as I'm sure most of us know by experience
Not conforming is a big deal though
Yes but the severity can vary, from just behaving like a ND autist to being a literal rapist nigga. I think most of us never did it on purpose
just bE a leach
You are assuming that those in your circle won't turn on you which is a flawed assumption. Any weakness from excessive benevolence within hierarchical structure of any group is met with disruptive rebellion and chaotic upheavel, followed by disintegration. Even if there's no rebellion, there will certainly be jealously. It is in human nature to feel entitled and blindingly want more. You have to let your people know who is boss, otherwise they will stop playing by the rules. People aren't naturally respectful, abiding, and devoted; you have to enforce order and structure.
Companies also have an obligation to provide the best service/product but they choose to profiteer through cheap underhanded means because its the path of least resistance. Seeking the least resistance is also in human nature, but its another vice which leads to eventual downfall.
You're by no means wrong, my argument is less so about the inherent perfection and innocence of people but rather how everything is technically sprung up from people having good intentions tbh. Like you said there needs to be order to prevent idealists with the best intentions in the world from fucking everything up and ruining it all. They do say that the road to hell is paved in good intentions.
I see.
I think your prescriptive stance is more moral and righteous. Making things more livable, harmonious, meaningful, and enjoyable is right thing to do for the long term sustainability of any order but to that, I point out that my repressive course of thinking is born from having observed the delinquency of people under peaceful and relatively utopic conditions.
To be fair there is an argument to be made that said good intentions I mentioned are but a smokescreen for more selfish reasonings. In fact it's probably the case in most scenarios lolI see.
Yeah.
ermmm It's 'red herring', not 'smokescreen'
Resolute acceptance of death.
both are synonyms, though I see red herring used more as a descriptor of the logical fallacy and smokescreen when describing hidden intentions
also as the pokemon move that no one uses
Stop incentivizing my libido bro!all i needed is for one ancestor to rope before they bred
Do you agree with this belief?
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
