Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment Do you agree that 90℅ of males should be killed?

Do you think 90℅ of males should be killed?

  • Yes

    Votes: 8 11.0%
  • No

    Votes: 65 89.0%

  • Total voters
    73
G

Ghost

Major
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
2,001
... And only the top 10℅ of males would be left alive.

This BTW is what extreme feminazis believe.


Do you agree with the extreme feminazis?
 
Last edited:
I just want to die and watch the world burn.
 
Who the fuck would vote yes?
 
if so , then every non stacy should be shot to death ,
 
Half of a person's genes come from their mother. Incels would still be produced even if only the top 1% of guys were able to reproduce.
 
No. We should kill 100% of females replace them with sexbots and artificial wombs instead. Our society would actually get better this way.
 
Absolutely not. Rotten holes and diehard simps are the ones that need to be culled.
 
No, the top 10% of males should be killed.
 
Only soyboys vote yes
 
90% of male fetuses aborted (and 100% chads aborted), so in future male value increased and femoids becoming cheaper
 
No, I want 100% of everyone to die.
 
No. Most men have it bad enough as it is. They should be allowed to cope freely which is the only thing they have in their miserable lives.
 
No, obviously.

If you changed it to women, I'd have voted yes - especially If I was allowed to be the executioner (In GTA V).
 
I think that the top 90% of males should be killed, and only trucels left alive
 
Cuck if you vote yes.
 
Only if they agree to kill women the women that are genetic trash
 
90% of both men and women will be extinguished according to the plans of the elite. the population will decline to under 1 billion before 2200,
just take a look it is already been starting.
1580059409349
 
There is no need to fret over what feminazis say because in the end, they are extinguishing themselves along with us.
 
Hmmm,idk man.
Being happy with your looksmatch or genocide.You're really giving me a hard time
 
No. We should kill 100% of females replace them with sexbots and artificial wombs instead. Our society would actually get better this way.
Yeah I do think we need to find a way to replace women because just shoving them back into their gender roles is stupid after all they've done.
 
How the fuck are feminists going to run society by killing 90% of men? Men do all the dangerous jobs and invent everything that keeps society running. Without men, women would be living in fucking mud huts eating bugs.
 
How the fuck are feminists going to run society by killing 90% of men? Men do all the dangerous jobs and invent everything that keeps society running. Without men, women would be living in fucking mud huts eating bugs.
It's a delusional radfem cope. Why would women give up life on tutorial mode to be the rulers of a big, worthless, pile of shit?
 
The whole world needs to get nuked
 
Only the top 10% of men should, so there won't be any more chad dick chasing.
 
Last edited:
... And only the top 10℅ of males would be left alive.

This BTW is what extreme feminazis believe.


Do you agree with the extreme feminazis?
It would be important, this process was common in mideval and pre modern times due to war deaths and dangerous occupations. However now excess men like us are left behind
 
Fags who like sucking chad dick.
Chad worshippers aren't just Uncle Toms, but also retards, legitimately thinking the reason foids are thirsty for Chads is because they're a race of smarter, more talented superhumans compared to sub8 men, and conversely think the reason foids aren't attracted to ugly and/or short men (that aren't celebrities) is because we're actually an inferior race compared to more attractive men, in their ideal world Newton, Hawking, Napoleon, Avogadro, Keynes, Neil DeGrasse, greek philosophers, etc. would've been exterminated while people like Jason Momoa, Bieber, The Rock, Onision, Paul brothers and Ted Bundy would be in charge of science and politics :feelskek:
 
Imagine the irony if this poll turned out to show that very ratio.
 
in their ideal world Newton, Hawking, Napoleon, Avogadro, Keynes, Neil DeGrasse, greek philosophers, etc. would've been exterminated while people like Jason Momoa, Bieber, The Rock, Onision, Paul brothers and Ted Bundy would be in charge of science and politics
It's very hard for me to believe the "blackpillers" who think that way also don't postmax on cucktears.
 
... And only the top 10℅ of males would be left alive.

This BTW is what extreme feminazis believe.


Do you agree with the extreme feminazis?
No. The proper implementation of eugenics within society, that will allow us all to have the best genes, can be executed without killing the population. Inferior genes can simply be replaced with the optimal ones, without harming the parents, so that their children grow up to be superior humans.
 
Chad worshippers aren't just Uncle Toms, but also retards, legitimately thinking the reason foids are thirsty for Chads is because they're a race of smarter, more talented superhumans compared to sub8 men, and conversely think the reason foids aren't attracted to ugly and/or short men (that aren't celebrities) is because we're actually an inferior race compared to more attractive men, in their ideal world Newton, Hawking, Napoleon, Avogadro, Keynes, Neil DeGrasse, greek philosophers, etc. would've been exterminated while people like Jason Momoa, Bieber, The Rock, Onision, Paul brothers and Ted Bundy would be in charge of science and politics :feelskek:
Seriously I want to make a thread about how stupid thinking chads are some super species. They are just more attractive to women that's it.
 
thing is, even on university campuses where 70% of students are foids, they will only go for chad. the problem with her theory is that she thinks this will give men a "choice of a myriad of women due to the difference in sex ratio". foids would rather stay single than settle for a sub-8 male. sure, it would help somewhat, but the real problem that needs solving is female hypergamy. she should be campaigning for scientists to come up with a way to get rid of the hypergamy gene (or whatever it is in the foid brain that causes hypergamy) in fetuses.
 
Many young men already get killed in wars regardless but no way
 
OP, why does your percent sign look like that? There's a little "c" instead of a circle.
 
I voted yes.

Even if it means my own death, I don't care too much about my own life. It would mean the end of suffering for a lot of males. I just want the clown world to collapse.
 
Chad worshippers aren't just Uncle Toms, but also retards, legitimately thinking the reason foids are thirsty for Chads is because they're a race of smarter, more talented superhumans compared to sub8 men, and conversely think the reason foids aren't attracted to ugly and/or short men (that aren't celebrities) is because we're actually an inferior race compared to more attractive men, in their ideal world Newton, Hawking, Napoleon, Avogadro, Keynes, Neil DeGrasse, greek philosophers, etc. would've been exterminated while people like Jason Momoa, Bieber, The Rock, Onision, Paul brothers and Ted Bundy would be in charge of science and politics :feelskek:
Lmao loled at the last part ngl

Also this thread is cucked tbh the chad worship in this forum is real
 
WHO IS THE CUCK WHO VOTED YES
 

Similar threads

Stupid Clown
Replies
3
Views
622
manletcel1488
manletcel1488
oddneg
Replies
37
Views
3K
Cryotron
Cryotron
E
Replies
17
Views
3K
DarkStar
DarkStar
SandNiggerKANG1
Replies
149
Views
10K
Rapistcel
Rapistcel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top