Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Do women have souls?

schizoidcel_11

schizoidcel_11

Banned
-
Joined
Mar 10, 2018
Posts
124
(I don't mean souls in the religious sense, but in the sense that you're a being with a greater purpose, with honor, etc.)

I was watching a Bobby Lee podcast with Asa Akira and something caught my attention. The question came up was this: If you were stranded on an island, starving, and your significant other died, would you eat your significant other's body in order to survive for a couple more days?

Bobby Lee said no, of course not. However Bobby Lee's wife and Asa Akira said they would definitely eat their significant other's body. And they were puzzled as to why one wouldn't eat their significant other's body. Why is this? Would these women seriously eat the love of their lives, just so that they could have a chance of escaping the island and riding the cock carousel again? Is love that meaningless to them and other women? Personally I would try to find some sort of vine that could act as a rope, and off myself right next to my dead wife. I can't imagine not doing that.

And this begs the question: Do women have souls? Are women capable of true romance? Or are they just soulless beings who just want to survive and have as much enjoyment as possible? I'd like to think it isn't true. I'd like to think they do have souls and I'm wrong. But I don't know boyos...
 
they have empty souls that only exist to suck the life out of men
 
I don't think it's a binary thing, what you call a soul I'd call sentience. There's a sort of a scale to it and not all people have the same amount of sentience. Women have barely more sentience than animals, but they have human intelligence so they can mimic human behavior. But if you could listen to their thoughts you'd find nothing human there, just Chad telemetry and maintenance reports.
 
And this begs the question: Do women have souls? Are women capable of true romance? Or are they just soulless beings who just want to survive and have as much enjoyment as possible? I'd like to think it isn't true. I'd like to think they do have souls and I'm wrong. But I don't know boyos...
Are you even asking this question?
Purple pill kek
However Bobby Lee's wife and Asa Akira said they would definitely eat their significant other's bod
Animals
 
(I don't mean souls in the religious sense, but in the sense that you're a being with a greater purpose, with honor, etc.)

I was watching a Bobby Lee podcast with Asa Akira and something caught my attention. The question came up was this: If you were stranded on an island, starving, and your significant other died, would you eat your significant other's body in order to survive for a couple more days?

Bobby Lee said no, of course not. However Bobby Lee's wife and Asa Akira said they would definitely eat their significant other's body. And they were puzzled as to why one wouldn't eat their significant other's body. Why is this? Would these women seriously eat the love of their lives, just so that they could have a chance of escaping the island and riding the cock carousel again? Is love that meaningless to them and other women? Personally I would try to find some sort of vine that could act as a rope, and off myself right next to my dead wife. I can't imagine not doing that.

And this begs the question: Do women have souls? Are women capable of true romance? Or are they just soulless beings who just want to survive and have as much enjoyment as possible? I'd like to think it isn't true. I'd like to think they do have souls and I'm wrong. But I don't know boyos...
thats some brainfood to think about

The anceint greeks mentioned that chaos was inherently a feminine trait
I'm gonna say no, women will have souls, and I'm saying all of them, including the autistic ones with a male brain. All of them

Only in fiction do women have souls
 
no foids are just npcs who go after chad and buster
 
Of course not lol

 
Didn't some of the old religions say foids had no souls?
 
Didn't some of the old religions say foids had no souls?
If I remember correctly there was a conference where Christians discussed whether women have souls or not
 
(I don't mean souls in the religious sense, but in the sense that you're a being with a greater purpose, with honor, etc.)

I was watching a Bobby Lee podcast with Asa Akira and something caught my attention. The question came up was this: If you were stranded on an island, starving, and your significant other died, would you eat your significant other's body in order to survive for a couple more days?

Bobby Lee said no, of course not. However Bobby Lee's wife and Asa Akira said they would definitely eat their significant other's body. And they were puzzled as to why one wouldn't eat their significant other's body. Why is this? Would these women seriously eat the love of their lives, just so that they could have a chance of escaping the island and riding the cock carousel again? Is love that meaningless to them and other women? Personally I would try to find some sort of vine that could act as a rope, and off myself right next to my dead wife. I can't imagine not doing that.

And this begs the question: Do women have souls? Are women capable of true romance? Or are they just soulless beings who just want to survive and have as much enjoyment as possible? I'd like to think it isn't true. I'd like to think they do have souls and I'm wrong. But I don't know boyos...
Screenshot 20200521 114024 Gallery


RAGNAR REDBEARD in his book published around 1910 states definitively that foids have no soul. @MountainGorilla @FinnCel thoughts?
 
I don't think it's a binary thing, what you call a soul I'd call sentience. There's a sort of a scale to it and not all people have the same amount of sentience. Women have barely more sentience than animals, but they have human intelligence so they can mimic human behavior. But if you could listen to their thoughts you'd find nothing human there, just Chad telemetry and maintenance reports.
 
In the religious sense they do, of course, and are held accountable to their actions. In the more material sense they don't. Men possess a higher level of consciousness. If I were to order it, it would go men>women>great apes>dolphins. In that regard women are men's charge, like a pet, but more like a child. You're responsible for your dog shitting on somebody's lawn, and likewise you're responsible for your woman behaving like an unruly cunt.

Concepts like love, honor, duty, sacrifice, bond, word, are all male concepts. They're higher order concepts, right up there with truth and justice. Women don't operate with these concepts, because they are actually below their understanding. The concepts are as alien to them as visualizing n-dimensional geometries are to a man. This is why they were utterly puzzled by the idea of a man not eating his significant other to survive. The concept of human dignity that extends to their body after death is foreign to their processing and understanding. They only possess a superficial understanding of deep concepts. The female calculus operates entitely on serving herself.

All of the greatest creations of the mind have come from male brains. High art, philosophy, mathematics - the soul of humanity - has been incepted by men.
 
Last edited:
In the religious sense they do, of course, and are held accountable to their actions. In the more material sense they don't. Men possess a higher level of consciousness. If I were to order it, it would go men>women>great apes>dolphins. In that regard women are men's charge, like a pet, but more like a child. You're responsible for your dog shitting on somebody's lawn, and likewise you're responsible for your woman behaving like an unruly cunt.

Concepts like love, honor, duty, sacrifice, bond, word, are all male concepts. They're higher order concepts, right up there with truth and justice. Women don't operate with these concepts, because they are actually below their understanding. The concepts are as alien to them as visualizing n-dimensional geometries are to a man. This is why they were utterly puzzled by the idea of a man not eating his significant other to survive. The concept of human dignity that extends to their body after death is foreign to their processing and understanding. They only possess a superficial understanding of deep concepts. The female calculus operates entitely on serving herself.

All of the greatest creations of the mind have come from male brains. High art, philosophy, mathematics - the soul of humanity - has been incepted by men.
Chess GRANDMASTER IQ
 
I don't think it's a binary thing, what you call a soul I'd call sentience. There's a sort of a scale to it and not all people have the same amount of sentience. Women have barely more sentience than animals, but they have human intelligence so they can mimic human behavior. But if you could listen to their thoughts you'd find nothing human there, just Chad telemetry and maintenance reports.
 
There is something all prehistoric graves have in common: the lack of female bodies. If a tribe attacked another one, they would kill the men and children but kidnap the women for breeding. To men, survival means collaborating in order to protect what is theirs and their childrens lives, to women however survival means to submit to the strongest man around. Women have no empathy and they dont care for anbody but themselves, anybody who says different is a deluded, egalitarian ideologue. Women have no concept of honor, soil, property or loyalty, they only care about themselves, this is why women will murder their own children, abort babies, force them into sex changes, manipulate them for power and divorce rape their husbands, destroying their families over a house and some money. Women are evil by nature and this evil has to be suppressed by men, who are good by nature.
 
No. They are not even biologically capable of having a soul or even true consciousness.

Foids brains are primary controlled by the limbic system which mostly based on instincts, emotions, memories, and sexual arousal. So they are basically running on an auto-programmed NPC mode and are not truly conscious beings. Their actions are driven by feelings and instincts that have been genetically evovled over billions of years, and those instincts are honed to manipulate males by pretending to love them in order to gain resources for reproduction.

This also explains why foids lack the traits seen in conscious beings, traits like empathy, honour, loyalty, faith, and selflessness.
 
Last edited:
No. They have a herd mentality, zero uniqueness, exact clones of one another, look and act the same, no individuality. They’re more concerned about what the herd thinks of them than just thinking for themselves. Or having any actual values. Worthless. Absolutely worthless.
 
(I don't mean souls in the religious sense

Well, that's kinda pertinent here because the use of the word "soul" in the religious context is erroneous. What they are talking about is spirit. The Greek word for soul is "psyche" which explains exactly what women are for the most part: creatures whose entire world revolves around the realm of psychological impressions that have no connection to objective reality, which means they are essentially ALL soul if we go by the true definition of the word.

Meanwhile, the Greek word for spirit is Nous, which is a quality more readily associated with the masculine mind, which is why all the great religious sages were men.

The "transcendent" value of woman lies in her "being", not her mind. That's the mistake the IT people make. They think the "personality" of a woman is a reflection of the transcendent qualities of femininity she displays by means of her beauty for instance but that is not the case at all, for it is men who posses transcendence at an individual level, not women.

"The fixed stars signify the angel in man. That is why man orients himself by them; and that is why women have no appreciation for the starry sky; because they have no sense of the angel in man."

- Otto Weininger.
 
(I don't mean souls in the religious sense, but in the sense that you're a being with a greater purpose, with honor, etc.)
We have purposes but if they rank as 'greater' is pretty subjective.

I view porn documentation as a higher purpose (I'm a historian) but most foids would not, and conversely I wouldn't view "travel the world fucking dozens of chads" a higher purpose, but many foids do.

I could argue my hobbies are more selfless, more contributing to human progress, more skilled, more imaginative. I'd be right. But perhaps there are some virtues foids can use to argue on behalf of their hobbies. My ear is open
 
Women are souless vessels that exist in this world to torture me
 

Similar threads

Adolf Kitler
Replies
25
Views
613
SmhChan
SmhChan
pedrolopezwasright
Replies
15
Views
414
ApexLegendscel
ApexLegendscel
spermretentionmax
Replies
44
Views
1K
FLAME KAISER
FLAME KAISER
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
93
Views
3K
ordinaryotaku
ordinaryotaku

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top