Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Do people here bother reading researched posts with information?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 15752
  • Start date
Deleted member 15752

Deleted member 15752

Mogged from Fairbanks to Vladivostok
-
Joined
Nov 13, 2018
Posts
21,626
well researched thread with tons of info and evidence.
Replies: 2

Comments:
"High iq thread, I agree with this.. let me elab on it"

2 word long thread
Replies: 25

Comments:
"cope"
"rope"
"low iq"
"t. numale"



Shitposting is funny, but I feel sorry when someone gets 3 replies on a well researched thread while 2 sentences get more attention than that.
 
It's more of an attention span. I know for me personally, I have ADHD. I can't read past three sentences no matter how hard I try. That's why I typically go off other comments and elaborate.
 
It's more of an attention span. I know for me personally, I have ADHD. I can't read past three sentences no matter how hard I try. That's why I typically go off other comments and elaborate.
That is understandable.
 
most people who make high effort posts can't take criticism, so if I can't discuss why bother to begin with.
 
Last edited:
I highly doubt since high IQ threads are not as viewed as low iq threads
 
That is understandable.

Yeah, or if it's a thread that doesn't have many responses like Eugenist I'd copy his post and break it down word by word. It takes about 30 minutes but if the poster puts a lot of thought and effort into it it's worth it.
 
I highly doubt since high IQ threads are not as viewed as low iq threads
Why? Shouldnt it be the other way around??
Yeah, or if it's a thread that doesn't have many responses like Eugenist I'd copy his post and break it down word by word. It takes about 30 minutes but if the poster puts a lot of thought and effort into it it's worth it.
Your case is different.
 
Yeah, or if it's a thread that doesn't have many responses like Eugenist I'd copy his post and break it down word by word. It takes about 30 minutes but if the poster puts a lot of thought and effort into it it's worth it.
You always bump good threads tbh so that when I come home and log in, it's the good threads that come up because you kept them alive. Appreciated :feelsokman:


Shitposting is funny, but I feel sorry when someone gets 3 replies on a well researched thread while 2 sentences get more attention than that.
Believe it or not, I used to make high effort threads with [Blackpill] or [Serious] and got very few replies except "high IQ" like once or twice and maybe an elab. They didn't feel satisfying to make so I stopped I guess.
 
Depends what it is.
 
You always bump good threads tbh so that when I come home and log in, it's the good threads that come up because you kept them alive. Appreciated :feelsokman:



Believe it or not, I used to make high effort threads with [Blackpill] or [Serious] and got very few replies except "high IQ" like once or twice and maybe an elab. They didn't feel satisfying to make so I stopped I guess.
Exactly, I will always reply and read high effort threads.There is no point in making them anymore.
 
It's the kind of thing that happens with posts on everything. Everything that wants to gain attention must be structured in a certain way.
 
You always bump good threads tbh so that when I come home and log in, it's the good threads that come up because you kept them alive. Appreciated :feelsokman:

Thanks man, I appreciate that :feelsokman:
 
you see the key to the perfect high iq post is not a long boring hard to read post (no offense to the people that do that high respect for those)the key is to pass your iq message through jokes or simple sentences i cant come up with an example right now but you get the point
 
It's the kind of thing that happens with posts on everything. Everything that wants to gain attention must be structured in a certain way.
I can name a thread with 30 replies and 2 sentences. @Eugenicist threads are high iq but its literally so low in replies it ends up being a debate about the thread between certain users.
 
I don’t see much of those these days and honestly most thi reads these days are just beating horses who were dead before I even joined. I still enjoy reading high IQ threads as they provide a nice break from the typical spammed threads
 
I can name a thread with 30 replies and 2 sentences. @Eugenicist threads are high iq but its literally so low in replies it ends up being a debate about the thread between certain users.
There was an egg that got an insane amount of attention on social media or something. Just an egg. Just appeal to the lowest common denominator theory.
 
I can name a thread with 30 replies and 2 sentences. @Eugenicist threads are high iq but its literally so low in replies it ends up being a debate about the thread between certain users.
Yeah, his threads need more attention
 
I don’t see much of those these days and honestly most thi reads these days are just beating horses who were dead before I even joined. I still enjoy reading high IQ threads as they provide a nice break from the typical spammed threads
I agree, if I make a high IQ thread I have to bump it by constantly replying to every comment. While "its over" gets replies, life stories and essays.
 
I agree, if I make a high IQ thread I have to bump it by constantly replying to every comment. While "its over" gets replies, life stories and essays.
Yeah, admittedly I’ve never made high IQ threads, but my old ones got few replies so I don’t bother making any threads now. I’d rather post high IQ responses to a post than make a high IQ thread tbh
 
Yeah, admittedly I’ve never made high IQ threads, but my old ones got few replies so I don’t bother making any threads now. I’d rather post high IQ responses to a post than make a high IQ thread tbh
Yep, I reply with "Ok" to low iq threads.. aaaand i got a warning for it. Low iq threads deserve low iq replies.
 
Yep, I reply with "Ok" to low iq threads.. aaaand i got a warning for it. Low iq threads deserve low iq replies.
Yeah, I kind of feel guilty when I simply empty quote someone but for the most part it’s because there’s not much to say about a given topic
 
Yep, I reply with "Ok" to low iq threads.. aaaand i got a warning for it. Low iq threads deserve low iq replies.
I hate getting warnings tbh. Stressful stuff.
 
i come here for fun not to go to school bro
 
I hate getting warnings tbh. Stressful stuff.
Its not even that stressful tbh, I reckon its funny getting warnings.
Yeah, I kind of feel guilty when I simply empty quote someone but for the most part it’s because there’s not much to say about a given topic
Same here, but I feel like the guy took the words out of my mouth so I have to quote him.
 
Its not even that stressful tbh, I reckon its funny getting warnings.

Same here, but I feel like the guy took the words out of my mouth so I have to quote him.
That used to happen to me all the time with @Insomniac He would always post exactly what I was going to post :feelsbadman: It's only a temp though.
 
The virgin "evolutionary terms of natural selection and it's products" Vs the Chad "do I hav aiDs?"
 
The virgin "evolutionary terms of natural selection and it's products" Vs the Chad "do I hav aiDs?"
Was thinking about that, Incel High iq thread vs Chad low iq thread
That used to happen to me all the time with @Insomniac He would always post exactly what I was going to post :feelsbadman: It's only a temp though.
Postmaxxer recognize postmaxxers.
 
well researched thread with tons of info and evidence.
Replies: 2

Comments:
"High iq thread, I agree with this.. let me elab on it"

2 word long thread
Replies: 25

Comments:
"cope"
"rope"
"low iq"
"t. numale"



Shitposting is funny, but I feel sorry when someone gets 3 replies on a well researched thread while 2 sentences get more attention than that.
And that's exactly I never post research here. Anything you say that lasts more than a paragraph get a TL;DR, so I just keep most of my thoughts to myself.
 
You and @Insomniac never make threads. All I see is replies tbh
I will go off and make a thread immediately now tbh. await my high iqness for it is much savory :waitwhat::feelsmage:
 
I can name a thread with 30 replies and 2 sentences. @Eugenicist threads are high iq but its literally so low in replies it ends up being a debate about the thread between certain users.
It's because I choose to let you all argue amongst yourselves and I observe how the overall flow of how you're all going about the argument.
I usually know what all of you are going to say anyway so it's no real gain whether I invest or not.
If you want clarification on my behalf/ debate then PM me.
 
It's because I choose to let you all argue amongst yourselves and I observe how the overall flow of how you're all going about the argument.
I usually know what all of you are going to say anyway so it's no real gain whether I invest or not.
If you want clarification on my behalf/ debate then PM me.
All I was trying to say was that you put nice effort in your threads and you dont get as many replies compared to the "its over" one sentence threads that get numerous replies.
 
aint nobody got time for that
 
All I was trying to say was that you put nice effort in your threads and you dont get as many replies compared to the "its over" one sentence threads that get numerous replies.
You make a good case about it.
Just so many people don't have the processing power.
Our species is doomed if this is the full extent of what humanity is capable of even with indoor heating, and an internet connection, and a neet-ready helicopter headway system.
Leisure.
And yet 20 mexicans are born like every hour.
 
Same here, but I feel like the guy took the words out of my mouth so I have to quote him.
This normally happens whenever @Insomniac beats me to a thread
 
I tend ot ignore most "research" posts because alot of it is improperly done. I can only remember one experiment that was pretty well done but their documentation was nonexistant.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top