N word?
White?
White?
People still do?
And she got turned on when she saw him getting beat up.
B
My hatred of white knights and cucks is beginning to overtake my hatred of foids.
every man is a sleeper cell ready to attack you at some bitches whim
im never leaving my room again fuck this earth
Just now? This is way easier to hate cucks and white knights than femoid.
Link goes nowhere....
Definitely. I never hated foids in the first place. If you do, then you hate biology and nature. Simps on the other hand are abominations birthed by modern society.
B
I've always hated them for their behaviors and actions in society, not necessarily their nature. I won't hate a woman for being hypergamous, because she can't help that, but I will hate her for ruining her marriage of 15 years and three children and destroying her family, all for Chadriguez's charms, hunter eyes, sly smile, and tall, muscular stature.
They are just deterministic machines acting on their biological urges. I feel no hate towards anyone.
B
I'm not a determinist, so I assign them full agency, not to justify my hatred, but so that it doesn't excuse their destructive impulses acted out in society and negatively affecting the rest of us as a result.
She was so wet watching that, the public bench is gonna need a power wash.
Women can't really take any decision on their own, they need the credit and support of someone telling them to go do something (like cheat) which they can easily get. They don't work off of a singular experience.
They can't be blamed for having any "agency" of their own. Women don't do anything by themselves. They decide everything in a group of other women (and/or Cucks).
I personally don't choose to only believe in things that serve society, which seems to be what you're doing. But correct me if I'm wrong.
My worldview is whatever seems most likely to me based on the things that I know and observe. Mostly coming from science.
Humans can still make rules that go against their biology. Which is also what we have been doing for thousands of years. That might be done for the maximization of happiness for everyone. Restricting women into marriage might benefit them too. Especially when they get older.
Last edited:
B
Yes, I understand; hive mind and all that. But that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking strictly about their capacity to be able to act of their accord in a more general sense.
They need complete extermination.
Not even hive mind. I mean that many times the way they decide anything is that if one other person thinks it's good, (no matter how many people think it's bad) if it IS a bad, hurtful, spiteful scornful thing, they choose that option because one other person played to their evil temptations. I don't know what to call that exactly.. it's not exactly like hive mind..
Ya I get it. You can blame them for the emergent properties of their natural instinct but not for having the natural instinct itself. But even here, I'm not sure if it's the hypergamous instinct or what that causes femoid to cheat. Even if she is in an emotionally and sexually satisfying relationship/marriage, what seems to matter most to women is whether or not they can get support for completing an action (no matter what that action is).
Last edited:
B
I don't either, but looking at such systems, institutions, and mechanisms that help maintain an orderly and functional (as opposed to dysfunctional) society serves as an excellent barometer for the state of affairs and civilization itself. When society becomes morally decadent, for example, it's a clear sign (with proven historical cases) that it's on a downward trend and heading towards a collapse.
That's fine, whatever. That's reasonable, of course, and is what most people do informally throughout their lives, through experience and trial and error.
Restricting women to marriage benefits all of the males in the group (read: society). This is what we men figured out thousands and thousands of years ago when we introduced the concept of marriage. Having chads going around fucking all of the women would breed a lot of hatred, resentment, and violence (along with all of his bastards KEK), all of which would ultimately result in chaos. Marriage was the order to curb the chaos that naturally stems from chad freely exercising his polygamous nature - the same male nature in all of us.
In today's clown world, however, all of the work done in history towards this has been either inverted on its head (e.g., "open marriages"... JFL @ that degeneracy) or has been completely discarded (e.g., highly valuing chastity in women as a society). The result is the chaos that we're experiencing today with 5% or so of the males having regular sex through tinder and other avenues, while the number of sexless males continues to rise, year after year. We're also seeing record divorce rates, initiated mostly by women, because hypergamy, of course ("I'm not happy," "I need to find myself" and other trivial excuses to slut around and feel "sexually liberated").
Systematically, this was done through feminism and the sexual liberation movements in the 1960s. The theory behind the practice of giving women all of these freedoms in society is that when you allow female nature (hypergamy) to flourish freely, unbounded, and unchecked, it will ultimately destroy society from the inside out. Now, if you want to put your tinfoil hat and go for a nice long to walk to conspiracy town, you'll explore reasons for why one would want to destroy society like this. I won't get into that here.
Is flirting a crime?
B
Only if you're ugly.
Interesting thoughts. Marriage definitely had a different meaning more than 100 years ago.
Divorce rates haven't really increased since the 60s, which imo is because those who don't want to commit to their partner don't even get married in the first place. Having relationships outside marriage is the norm now, where as in the past it would have resulted in low social status.
Damned whiteknight cucks once again
Jesus christ the guy got fucked up pretty badly is all over.
IT HAS, LOOK AT THE GRAPH FROM 2 PERCENT TO AKMOST 20 PERCENT% THATS AN 18% RISE!
Similar threads
Toxic Femininity
Seeing couples holding hands is a offensive gesture.
- DeathSigil
- Inceldom Discussion
DeathSigil
Users who are viewing this thread
