Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Dismissing Inceldom is a smart gaslight from the Normoids

Below Human

Below Human

Matthew 10:34
★★★
Joined
Feb 14, 2025
Posts
782
Even I can admit that it's quite smart of them to dismiss Inceldom entirely and instead place it on random, subjective, goal post moving "techniques" and "requirements" like not being hygienic enough, not being a nice guy, not approaching enough women, not having enough "swag"

If it was a majority consensus that Inceldom by genetics is very much real and that 30% of men have no shot, not one at ever finding a mate would those men not become increasingly violent? Of course they would, but by constant gas lighting and sedation due to hope they will stay quiet. This is very smart, I can admit.
 
I can also factor Religion, to be honest, as a technique used to sedate men
 
I sometimes wonder if their gaslighting is something humans evolved as a species. Deceiving sexual competitors and undesirable mates sounds like an evolutionarily stable strategy. It enables them to gatekeep us from sex while continuing to extract resources/labor from us.
 
I sometimes wonder if their gaslighting is something humans evolved as a species. Deceiving sexual competitors and undesirable mates sounds like an evolutionarily stable strategy.
Yes it is, undoubtedly. You need to find copes for the genetically low value men for them not to get upset and destroy the entire civilization that the genetic valued men have created for themselves.
 
Yes it is, undoubtedly. You need to find copes for the genetically low value men for them not to get upset and destroy the entire civilization that the genetic valued men have created for themselves.
Brutal
 
For example, Elliot Rodger is one man yet killed off 6 people. So in theory, a sentient and aware group of men that realize their life has zero purpose and shot at fulfillment and happiness would easily be able to completely turn society upside down on its head, in theory. So yes, from an evolutionary standpoint you need to find a purpose for these men. We have seen this in exploration, adventures, wars, religion.
 
I can also factor Religion, to be honest, as a technique used to sedate men
This is probably one of the reasons religious behavior evolved. Most of history's shamans and monks were probably trucels.
 
Gaslighting made sense before the social media age of the internet. Ugly guy has no idea what he's missing out on, he slaves away thinking that's how you get ahead. The few people you do know that sleep around must be trashy, diseased, etc...

We weren't supposed to know this much. Now we're in this strange limbo where men are still pressured to "self-improve" and all that but deep down even normies need to realize the social game.

The only thing holding back chaos is the social ostracization when a man dare utters a word against slaving his life away and if he's not willing to do everything for a woman.
 
Most people are very neurotic and they don't want to think of themselves as akin to animals, thus people make up abstract concepts like love to alleviate negative feelings surrounding sexuality.

Its not like most males in the animal kingdom have it good - and most definitely don't reproduce or even get the chance. Its how it has also been for most of history with humans too, and if foids are given the chance, then they will flock to Chad because that's what their natural instincts tell them to do.

People just don't want to admit the fact that women see most men as dead weight. Unattractive, useless genetic scum that shouldn't even exist. Most people do know it to be reality but they don't want to admit it, thus they resort to gaslighting.
 
Even I can admit that it's quite smart of them to dismiss Inceldom entirely and instead place it on random, subjective, goal post moving "techniques" and "requirements" like not being hygienic enough, not being a nice guy, not approaching enough women, not having enough "swag"

If it was a majority consensus that Inceldom by genetics is very much real and that 30% of men have no shot, not one at ever finding a mate would those men not become increasingly violent? Of course they would, but by constant gas lighting and sedation due to hope they will stay quiet. This is very smart, I can admit.
You may not be wrong about hypothetical situation being violence but it is not 30%. I read that only 2% are still virgins after 25.
 

Similar threads

Leonardo Part V
Replies
100
Views
5K
Sans
Sans
Lv99_BixNood
Replies
5
Views
456
Fantasea
Fantasea
Nordicel94
Replies
34
Views
1K
DarkStar
DarkStar
Devoteecel
Replies
4
Views
519
LornaDerek
LornaDerek
TheJoker
Replies
10
Views
795
shishiowasright
shishiowasright

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top