Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill [Dick>Height CONFIRMED] Dick size is at least as important as height, science proves it. And I will now prove why dick>height.

  • Thread starter Personalityinkwell
  • Start date
no, but the studies don't say that tall with average dick>average height with big dick

But if height and dick were equal, tall with average dick would be just as attractive as "average height and tall dick." There would be some red on that graph that could be achieved for the manlet, way at the top.

It does say "Tall with average dick>average height with big dick," based on what counts as "big" for this study. A flaccid 5+ inches is as exceptional as 6+ feet. If you wanna say "Well what if it's a 10 inch cock???" you would have to make equally extreme allowances for height.

And even if you did, how big is "big?" Suppose we ratcheted the dick length up to 14 cm. And the manlet was still in blue. Would you say "No no, that's not big enough, I mean a BIIIIIG dick." You could just continue demanding more dick until it reached red. And then say "See? A manlet can be just as attractive as a 6 foot guy with an 8cm flaccid penis. He just needs enough dick." And at what point does the carryover cease to be "equal?"
 
But if height and dick were equal, tall with average dick would be just as attractive as "average height and tall dick." There would be some red on that graph that could be achieved for the manlet, way at the top.

It does say "Tall with average dick>average height with big dick," based on what counts as "big" for this study. A flaccid 5+ inches is as exceptional as 6+ feet. If you wanna say "Well what if it's a 10 inch cock???" you would have to make equally extreme allowances for height.

And even if you did, how big is "big?" Suppose we ratcheted the dick length up to 14 cm. And the manlet was still in blue. Would you say "No no, that's not big enough, I mean a BIIIIIG dick." You could just continue demanding more dick until it reached red. And then say "See? A manlet can be just as attractive as a 6 foot guy with an 8cm flaccid penis. He just needs enough dick." And at what point does the carryover cease to be "equal?"
you're focused on flaccid sizes (you claim), not erect sizes, so it's flawed. women have sex with erect dicks, not hard ones
 
you're focused on flaccid sizes (you claim), not erect sizes, so it's flawed. women have sex with erect dicks, not hard ones

The link you posted talks about erect penises just under 6 inches. That's scarcely bigger than the penises in the other study. If not the same size, if the other study is talking about flaccid penises. So unless there's a dramatic shift in the results after a few centimeters, these studies conflict. The topmost penis size in the other study is about 5-5.8 inches.
 
Just have a penis in the top 5 percentile bro
 
The link you posted talks about erect penises just under 6 inches. That's scarcely bigger than the penises in the other study. If not the same size, if the other study is talking about flaccid penises. So unless there's a dramatic shift in the results after a few centimeters, these studies conflict. The topmost penis size in the other study is about 5-5.8 inches.
the study says that tall men get more of a boost, but that short men still get a boost
but for short men (165 cm), there was was a non-significant, attractiveness only increased by around 0.4 points.

and that only accounts for smaller dicks. just imagine what happens with even bigger dicks:
 
the study says that tall men get more of a boost, but that short men still get a boost

But you're not paying attention to the graph. Again, the boost is near nonexistent. The graph shows that height difference is what has the strongest effect. You're just taking that one quote and not paying attention to the rest of the study.
 
But you're not paying attention to the graph. Again, the boost is near nonexistent. The graph shows that height difference is what has the strongest effect. You're just taking that one quote and not paying attention to the rest of the study.
but that study includes tall men but ignores big dicks, so it's flawed

the tinder experiments prove how valuable large dicks are
 
https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Bl...ale_attractiveness_to_women_as_greater_height

Larger penis is just as important as greater height on male attractiveness, according to that study.

However, I will now argue why a bigger dick is more important.

The average dick is somewhere from 5-5.5 inches (studies vary). However, even at 5.5 inches, you can't give a woman a vaginal orgasm.


If you have a large penis, you can get laid on tinder from it:
Big dick game lookism Day 1
Big dick game lookism day 2
Big dick game looksmax

And lastly, if you have a micropenis, ITS OVER, even if you're Chad.

What about height? Well, if you're average height, you are still taller than the majority of women.

If you are tall, it's a boost, but you can't get laid through tinder by being tall, girls only care about your face. (and sometimes your dick if huge.) You don't get laid just by writing down 6'6 on Tinder, @ionlycopenow got no matches despite putting that in his bio. Face is king on Tinder, and Dick is queen because of size queens.

Lastly, if you are short, you can still get laid if you have a Chad face. Tom Cruise, Zac Efron, Taylor Lautner, Sam Dezz, all are manlets with Chad faces and have dating lives. You can find plenty of manlets with handsome faces who have girlfriends every day. Every manlet on this forum has an average or below face. The one fakecel manlet @ovrload had an above average face and despite being 5'6, still got laid and had a girlfiend.

DICK>HEIGHT, KEEP FUCKING COPING DICKPILL DENIERS

@Ropemaxx @nihility @Total Imbecile @mental_out @Edmund_Kemper
great thread. height copers on suicidewatch
how will they deny when facts are in their face now
@ScornedStoic @gymletethnicel @Diocel
 
but that study includes tall men but ignores big dicks, so it's flawed

the tinder experiments prove how valuable large dicks are

The "Mautz, et al" study you're talking about had an upper dick limit of 13 cm. The other study also includes 13 cm, it's a bit higher than the 12 mark. Again, the studies measure similar dick sizes.
 
Based Dickpiller
 
The "Mautz, et al" study you're talking about had an upper dick limit of 13 cm. The other study also includes 13 cm, it's a bit higher than the 12 mark. Again, the studies measure similar dick sizes.
still didn't disprove how much of a halo big dicks are
 
Maybe if you cocksucking faggots would read you wouldn't make utterly retarded threads.

"For example for a tall man (185 cm), there was a major increase in attractiveness by around 0.9 of 7 points when going from smallest to largest penis size, but for short men (165 cm), there was was a non-significant, attractiveness only increased by around 0.4 points."
show me a dude who gets laid on tinder due to height
 
I’d rather be tall than have a big dick.
 
Dick is what keeps 'em around once you've got them on the hook.

Height gives you an advantage outside sex & dating.

Good face gives you pocket aces on every hand.
 
still didn't disprove how much of a halo big dicks are

If by "big dicks" you mean the dicks in your study, then it did. If you didn't mean the dicks in your study, then your study didn't disprove them. Either way, the studies conflict with one another.
 
so, it's over
 
https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Bl...ale_attractiveness_to_women_as_greater_height

Larger penis is just as important as greater height on male attractiveness, according to that study.

However, I will now argue why a bigger dick is more important.

The average dick is somewhere from 5-5.5 inches (studies vary). However, even at 5.5 inches, you can't give a woman a vaginal orgasm.


If you have a large penis, you can get laid on tinder from it:
Big dick game lookism Day 1
Big dick game lookism day 2
Big dick game looksmax

And lastly, if you have a micropenis, ITS OVER, even if you're Chad.

What about height? Well, if you're average height, you are still taller than the majority of women.

If you are tall, it's a boost, but you can't get laid through tinder by being tall, girls only care about your face. (and sometimes your dick if huge.) You don't get laid just by writing down 6'6 on Tinder, @ionlycopenow got no matches despite putting that in his bio. Face is king on Tinder, and Dick is queen because of size queens.

Lastly, if you are short, you can still get laid if you have a Chad face. Tom Cruise, Zac Efron, Taylor Lautner, Sam Dezz, all are manlets with Chad faces and have dating lives. You can find plenty of manlets with handsome faces who have girlfriends every day. Every manlet on this forum has an average or below face. The one fakecel manlet @ovrload had an above average face and despite being 5'6, still got laid and had a girlfiend.

DICK>HEIGHT, KEEP FUCKING COPING DICKPILL DENIERS

@Ropemaxx @nihility @Total Imbecile @mental_out @Edmund_Kemper
Do you think as 5'5 curry if get dick to 9*6.5 i can ascend?
 
Women will always go for the best looking man. If his penis is not big enough for her then she will make do with using a big dildo she won't go and sleep with ugly guy with big dick.
 
Do you think as 5'5 curry if get dick to 9*6.5 i can ascend?
Depends on your face tbh. and also depends on your standards.

there are sites out there where you can advertise your dick
 
these days i think it's just become too hard to get noticed at all by women

the guy who succeeds based on dick, has a whisper campaign behind him of girls talking or texting about his dick, for that to happen you need at least one lay that went well

So just have a big dick and be NT enough to have a social circle and start spreading rumors. It’s over.
 
But you're not paying attention to the graph. Again, the boost is near nonexistent. The graph shows that height difference is what has the strongest effect. You're just taking that one quote and not paying attention to the rest of the study.
Don't fucking bother trying to convince them dude. Just the fact that height is visible in public but not dick size is enough said. Heightpill downplayers are outright retarded at this point. That's the best thing about being a manlet. We have to deal with this shit whether we're talking to cucktears or incels.
Maybe if you cocksucking faggots would read you wouldn't make utterly retarded threads.

"For example for a tall man (185 cm), there was a major increase in attractiveness by around 0.9 of 7 points when going from smallest to largest penis size, but for short men (165 cm), there was was a non-significant, attractiveness only increased by around 0.4 points."
I like how none of the tallfags refuted you here. Their only counterpoints are anecdotes. They don't even have the decency to say "Oh you're right, I didn't read that part. My bad." Typical tallfag arrogance. Debating with them is the same as debating a bluepiller. You could have a study proving that a manlet barely gets a boost from penis size, yet they'll still be here arguing with you.
 
Last edited:
Don't fucking bother dude. Just the fact that height is visible in public but not dick size is enough said. Heightpill downplayers are outright retarded at this point.
Online dating is the #1 way couples form these days, and that doesn't account for all the casual sex
 
Don't fucking bother trying to convince them dude. Just the fact that height is visible in public but not dick size is enough said. Heightpill downplayers are outright retarded at this point. That's the best thing about being a manlet. We have to deal with this shit whether we're talking to cucktears or incels.

If there's one main takeaway I'd like people to take away, it's that the studies conflict. And therein lies the flaw of our "Scientific Blackpill." They're just surveys. Really big polls. And those often differ. We see here that they're outright conflicting. And yet, when people think "Scientific Blackpill" they think "Objective, irrefutable fact of nature, down to the very chemicals you're born with and can never shake." Not so. We must always consider that, if another study was done with different people, even of the same demographic, the results might be different. As they appear to have been this time.
 
I don't understand. How can they tell if you have a big dick? If they don't find your height or face attractive you are never gonna get to the point were size matters.
 
I don't understand. How can they tell if you have a big dick? If they don't find your height or face attractive you are never gonna get to the point were size matters.
did you read the OP and look at the links?
 
you are comparing dudes who are short to tall, while comparing dudes with micro dicks to super small dicks
 
Last edited:
My dick was 5" last time i measured
 
I'll check this thread tomorrow morning.

@Angry_runt
 
Grant me a long enough dick and I will give zero fucks about my other features.

The same CAN NOT BE SAID ABOUT FACE OR HEIGHT.
 
Doesn’t matter your dick size when you’re 5’3 like me
 

Similar threads

W
Replies
28
Views
385
FrenchcelNeverbegan
FrenchcelNeverbegan
late20scel
Replies
37
Views
379
JustanotherKanga
JustanotherKanga

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top