FrothySolutions
Post like the FBI is watching.
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 6, 2018
- Posts
- 19,845
no, but the studies don't say that tall with average dick>average height with big dick
But if height and dick were equal, tall with average dick would be just as attractive as "average height and tall dick." There would be some red on that graph that could be achieved for the manlet, way at the top.
It does say "Tall with average dick>average height with big dick," based on what counts as "big" for this study. A flaccid 5+ inches is as exceptional as 6+ feet. If you wanna say "Well what if it's a 10 inch cock???" you would have to make equally extreme allowances for height.
And even if you did, how big is "big?" Suppose we ratcheted the dick length up to 14 cm. And the manlet was still in blue. Would you say "No no, that's not big enough, I mean a BIIIIIG dick." You could just continue demanding more dick until it reached red. And then say "See? A manlet can be just as attractive as a 6 foot guy with an 8cm flaccid penis. He just needs enough dick." And at what point does the carryover cease to be "equal?"