@Speedloader reported that a Russian femoid faced no jail time after producing child pornography with her four-year-old brother. I'm not a Russian speaker and can't verify the claims raised in the article, but if his translation is accurate, it is indeed reprehensible. Of course, Reddit picked up on it not to condemn child sexual exploitation, but to baselessly attack incels.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/qdthzf/incels_have_gotten_away_with_having_and/
I wonder how they're so confident in their assertion that incels have "gotten away" with possession and distribution of child pornography, because 1) I'm not aware that any incel possessed and distributed child pornography, and 2) these simply aren't crimes that law enforcement turns a blind eye to. Of course, law enforcement can't do anything if they aren't aware of a violation of the law, so that begs the question: if they had reason to believe that any person possessed and distributed child pornography, why didn't they report it?
Suppose it was true that law enforcement had probable cause to believe that incels engaged in child exploitation but chose to not follow up. Notice how not a single Redditor substantively addressed the original issue at hand: that for a femoid to rape their 4-year-old sibling is wrong, and the law shouldn't give her a slap on the wrist.
Here's a question for everyone: Why do you think these Redditors chose to fall back on whataboutism—a Soviet-era propaganda technique—to defend child rape without directly addressing its depravity, and in doing so, concoct an unrelated and wholly imaginary story about incels? Is it because these Redditors are intellectually feeble and grasping at straws to attack the incel community? Or is it because they, as their fellow bluepiller Dr. Pizza (a/k/a Peter Bright) did, endorse and desire to partake in child rape?
I don't have the answer, but it's definitely food for thought, so to speak.
Last but not least, one comment I should address:
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/qdthzf/comment/hhph1ij/
Unlike child sexual exploitation, "spreading hate" and "talking about rape" is clearly protected speech. You would have to be illiterate to pretend otherwise.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/qdthzf/incels_have_gotten_away_with_having_and/
I wonder how they're so confident in their assertion that incels have "gotten away" with possession and distribution of child pornography, because 1) I'm not aware that any incel possessed and distributed child pornography, and 2) these simply aren't crimes that law enforcement turns a blind eye to. Of course, law enforcement can't do anything if they aren't aware of a violation of the law, so that begs the question: if they had reason to believe that any person possessed and distributed child pornography, why didn't they report it?
Suppose it was true that law enforcement had probable cause to believe that incels engaged in child exploitation but chose to not follow up. Notice how not a single Redditor substantively addressed the original issue at hand: that for a femoid to rape their 4-year-old sibling is wrong, and the law shouldn't give her a slap on the wrist.
Here's a question for everyone: Why do you think these Redditors chose to fall back on whataboutism—a Soviet-era propaganda technique—to defend child rape without directly addressing its depravity, and in doing so, concoct an unrelated and wholly imaginary story about incels? Is it because these Redditors are intellectually feeble and grasping at straws to attack the incel community? Or is it because they, as their fellow bluepiller Dr. Pizza (a/k/a Peter Bright) did, endorse and desire to partake in child rape?
I don't have the answer, but it's definitely food for thought, so to speak.
Last but not least, one comment I should address:
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/qdthzf/comment/hhph1ij/
Unlike child sexual exploitation, "spreading hate" and "talking about rape" is clearly protected speech. You would have to be illiterate to pretend otherwise.
