Serious Denying Sub-8 Law is the ultimate cope

[micropenis29]

Sub-8 Law states that foids are only sexually attracted to the top 5% of men.

It can be tempting to think foids are sexually attracted to, say, 10 or 20% of men, because then as an incel you're thinking, "One day, I could surgically enhance myself to the point where I crack that top 20%!"

Sorry. The truth hurts, I know. But Sub-8 is Law.

And it's gonna be Sub-9 soon, you blue-pilled faggots.

 

[NEETard]

Cope

 

[Personalityinkwell]

brutal ngl

 

[AlexanderTheGreat11]

No surgery can fix me

 

[Personalityinkwell]

Cope

Not a cope. Top 5% (not just 1%) are attractive to foids. OkCupid did a study:

 

[NEETard]

Not a cope. Top 5% (not just 1%) are attractive to foids. OkCupid did a study:
View attachment 213876

Study doesnt deny the facts though

 

[Personalityinkwell]

Study doesnt deny the facts though

where are your facts?

 

[Deleted member 22531]

You hate to see it

 

[Deleted member 4999]

Study doesnt deny the facts though

0 facts retard

 

[NEETard]

where are your facts?

The tinder study said 20% of men get 80% of girls. So if women only find 5% attractive then women are dating non chads on tinder who they dont find attractive according to you. And btw dont say they are getting landwhales cause this is top 80% of women. The bottom 20% of women are who the bottom 80% of men fight for

 

[Personalityinkwell]

The tinder study said 20% of men get 80% of girls. So if women only find 5% attractive then women are dating non chads on tinder who they dont find attractive according to you. And btw dont say they are getting landwhales cause this is top 80% of women. The bottom 20% of women are who the bottom 80% of men fight for

being attractive to a woman and dating her are two different things:

Another way to think of it: anything below 8 is junk to foids, in the same sense that junk might pile up in your home. But not all junk is equal; some junk you could sell on Ebay. These are the 7's and 6's for foids. Ebay is betabuxing, datecucking, divorceraping, etc.

 

[NEETard]

0 facts retard

What about the fact that youre a bitch

 

[Deleted member 4999]

What about the fact that youre a bitch

That’s what you think retard

 

[Monk of Failure]

Women are surely sexually attracted to a few men but not definitely just 5%.

 

[NEETard]

That’s what you think retard

Dat wat u tink retart

 

[Personalityinkwell]

Women are surely sexually attracted to a few men but not definitely just 5%.

Not a cope. Top 5% (not just 1%) are attractive to foids. OkCupid did a study:
View attachment 213876

 

[Deleted member 24160]

where are your facts?

I wouldn't bother arguing with him.

 

[Deleted member 20811]

Unironically it will be Sub9 by 2030. Mark my words.

 

[Personalityinkwell]

I wouldn't bother arguing with him.

I'm beginning to think this forum is being infiltrated by people who just spout bluepill info and just act stubborn with their arguments in order to curb discussion. They just yell "cope" and don't support their arguments while we have facts and stats backing it up.

 

[micropenis29]

The tinder study said 20% of men get 80% of girls. So if women only find 5% attractive then women are dating non chads on tinder who they dont find attractive according to you.

I have explained this countless times and you continue to pretend I've never explained it.

Women date AND FUCK men that they aren't sexually attracted to (sub-8 men) as a means to an end. Girls do this from a young age. Virgin girls do it. No foid is exempt from this; they're all evolutionarily hardwired to have PLEASURELESS sex with sub-8 men and then strategically drain said men for their resources.

When foids fuck Chads, on the other hand, the sex itself IS THE END GOAL. The foid gets pleasure from the sex and has no ulterior motives.

 

[Deleted member 24160]

I'm beginning to think this forum is being infiltrated by people who just spout bluepill info and just act stubborn with their arguments in order to curb discussion. They just yell "cope" and don't support their arguments while we have facts and stats backing it up.

I don't think he's an infiltrator I think he just likes trolling. The last conversation I had with him he just kept saying cope and making fun of my age.

I have explained this countless times and you continue to pretend I've never explained it.

Women date AND FUCK men that they aren't sexually attracted to (sub-8 men) as a means to an end. Girls do this from a young age. Virgin girls do it. No foid is exempt from this; they're all evolutionarily hardwired to have PLEASURELESS sex with sub-8 men and then strategically drain said men for their resources.

When foids fuck Chads, on the other hand, the sex itself IS THE END GOAL. The foid gets pleasure from the sex and has no ulterior motives.

Like I told personality there is no point arguing with him.

 

[NEETard]

I have explained this countless times and you continue to pretend I've never explained it.

Women date AND FUCK men that they aren't sexually attracted to (sub-8 men) as a means to an end. Girls do this from a young age. Virgin girls do it. No foid is exempt from this; they're all evolutionarily hardwired to have PLEASURELESS sex with sub-8 men and then strategically drain said men for their resources.

When foids fuck Chads, on the other hand, the sex itself IS THE END GOAL. The foid gets pleasure from the sex and has no ulterior motives.

Women wil date men they arent attracted to, just to get things from them? Whatever helps you cope at night. Being a prostitute or having an onlyfans acc would be much more efficient and easier?

All your facts are based on what you want to believe. "Normied only get starfish sex, normies get cucked, normies get cheated on". How would you even know this info? Are you a normie and this happened to you?

 

[micropenis29]

Women wil date men they arent attracted to, just to get things from them? Whatever helps you cope at night. Being a prostitute or having an onlyfans acc would be much more efficient and easier?

All your facts are based on what you want to believe. "Normied only get starfish sex, normies get cucked, normies get cheated on". How would you even know this info? Are you a normie and this happened to you?

Your responses are too retarded for me to continue entertaining them.

 

[NEETard]

Your responses are too retarded for me to continue entertaining them.

Knew you would have no explanation for yourself. Typical delusional behaviour. When backed into a corner you pull the "youre an idiot im not gonna reply anymore" card.

 

[micropenis29]

Knew you would have no explanation for yourself. Typical delusional behaviour. When backed into a corner you pull the "youre an idiot im not gonna reply anymore" card.

It's impossible to respond rationally to someone who's typing incoherent nonsense.

 

[NEETard]

It's impossible to respond rationally to someone who's typing incoherent nonsense.

Relatable

 

[micropenis29]

Relatable

Actually, this is one of those rare situations where the mods SHOULD step in (they won't) and ban your ass or at least give you a harsh warning.

It's obvious YOU'RE the one arguing in bad faith here, purposely misinterpreting everything I say. You belong on Reddit. You'd fit right in.

 

[NEETard]

Actually, this is one of those rare situations where the mods SHOULD step in (they won't) and ban your ass or at least give you a harsh warning.

It's obvious YOU'RE the one arguing in bad faith here, purposely misinterpreting everything I say. You belong on Reddit. You'd fit right in.

Its hard not to misinterpret you when you change the definition of things every post you make.

Use the report button if you dont like it when people disagree with your delusional claims.

 

[Deleted member 22907]

No surgery can fix me

 

[Personalityinkwell]

A good explanation:

You don’t understand sub-8 theory.

It has been explained 300 billion times, but... oh well, why not one more time. Sub-8 Theory does not state that all men below 8 can’t get laid. It states that men below 8 are seen as below average to women and not desirable. This has been proven by online dating statistics multiple times. Plenty of men below 8 get laid multiple times, get LTRs, married, kids, etc. But the fact is they need to try EXTREMELY hard, get treated like shit, get cucked, have to be betabuxxes, divorcedraped, etc etc

Anyway, whatever. Can’t be bothered explaining any more. I’m a 3/10 so I’m not coping, I just recognise the world is fucked up for the majority of men, not just truecels.

 

[GoffSystemQB]

Not a cope. Top 5% (not just 1%) are attractive to foids. OkCupid did a study:
View attachment 213876

And what about when some girls say they're attracted to average-above-average men? Do you not think that is translated to "I'm attracted to chadlites"?

Even on here people rate people on average within 1 point. How can people not say that to some girls there are Chadlites that fall into 8/10+ (i.e. they are sexually attracted to them).

One of the easiest ways is falling into a pheno that girls exhibit a strong preference towards.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Yet another retarded thread by a low IQ dumbass who thinks an average penis of 5 inches is a "micropenis."

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

No it isn’t. The fact that women only find the top bracket of men attractive doesn’t lend any credence to to sub 8 theory ffs, most men in relationships are with their partners because it’s the best they can do, not because she would be their first choice if they had unlimited options.

If I’m being totally honest, I only find the top bracket of women attractive as well, but that doesn’t mean I wouldn’t settle for less if given the opportunity. Everyone, man or woman, is only as superficial as their options allow them to be. If I was a Chad and had the option to, you can bet your life I wouldn’t waste my time with anyone who wasn’t a Stacy.

Relationships are superficial at their core, and are predicated on convenience and one's available options. Most humans, if given the choice, would only pursue the top 20% of the other gender because that is the pathetic superficiality of our sexual nature as a species.

 

[Personalityinkwell]

No it isn’t. The fact that women only find the top bracket of men attractive doesn’t lend any credence to to sub 8 theory ffs, most men in relationships are with their partners because it’s the best they can do, not because she would be their first choice if they had unlimited options.

If I’m being totally honest, I only find the top bracket of women attractive as well, but that doesn’t mean I wouldn’t settle for less if given the opportunity. Everyone, man or woman, is only as superficial as their options allow them to be. If I was a Chad and had the option to, you can bet your life I wouldn’t waste my time with anyone who wasn’t a Stacy.

Relationships are superficial at their core, and are predicated on convenience and one's available options. Most humans, if given the choice, would only pursue the top 20% of the other gender because that is the pathetic superficiality of our sexual nature as a species.

the difference is you can't fuck stacies while any woman can fuck a Chad and therefore is upset when they get into a relationship with a sub8

And what about when some girls say they're attracted to average-above-average men? Do you not think that is translated to "I'm attracted to chadlites"?

Even on here people rate people on average within 1 point. How can people not say that to some girls there are Chadlites that fall into 8/10+ (i.e. they are sexually attracted to them).

One of the easiest ways is falling into a pheno that girls exhibit a strong preference towards.

fair point, girls can differ slightly in preferences, such as BBC whores for example

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

the difference is you can't fuck stacies while any woman can fuck a Chad and therefore is upset when they get into a relationship with a sub8

No they can’t man, hypergamy does exist to some extent but in no world is it that extreme. Outside of depraved fetishists, or extremely drunk one night stands, Chads do not fuck obese or hideous women. That is one of the most oft repeated fallacies of this forum and it is one of the reasons a lot of the truths in the Blackpill will never be taken seriously by the outside world.

 

[Personalityinkwell]

No they can’t man, hypergamy does exist to some extent but in no world is it that extreme. Outside of depraved fetishists, or extremely drunk one night stands, Chads do not fuck obese or hideous women. That is one of the most oft repeated fallacies of this forum and it is one of the reasons a lot of the truths in the Blackpill will never be taken seriously by the outside world.

https://incels.is/threads/reminder-the-average-smv-of-a-landwhale.163690/

 

[GoffSystemQB]

No it isn’t. The fact that women only find the top bracket of men attractive doesn’t lend any credence to to sub 8 theory ffs, most men in relationships are with their partners because it’s the best they can do, not because she would be their first choice if they had unlimited options.

If I’m being totally honest, I only find the top bracket of women attractive as well, but that doesn’t mean I wouldn’t settle for less if given the opportunity. Everyone, man or woman, is only as superficial as their options allow them to be. If I was a Chad and had the option to, you can bet your life I wouldn’t waste my time with anyone who wasn’t a Stacy.

Relationships are superficial at their core, and are predicated on convenience and one's available options. Most humans, if given the choice, would only pursue the top 20% of the other gender because that is the pathetic superficiality of our sexual nature as a species.

FWIW I don't think this is really near as common for men. I often finds girls that people on here call ugly to be attractive.

There is little point even rating or attempting to rate women for me because I find the vast, vast majority of them attractive and cannot really rate them.

 

[based_meme]

No it isn’t. The fact that women only find the top bracket of men attractive doesn’t lend any credence to to sub 8 theory ffs, most men in relationships are with their partners because it’s the best they can do, not because she would be their first choice if they had unlimited options.

That's literally in support of what the sub8 law claims. It doesn't exclude sub8 relationships existing, because those relationships exist precisely for materialistic and utilitarian reasons.

If I’m being totally honest, I only find the top bracket of women attractive as well, but that doesn’t mean I wouldn’t settle for less if given the opportunity. Everyone, man or woman, is only as superficial as their options allow them to be. If I was a Chad and had the option to, you can bet your life I wouldn’t waste my time with anyone who wasn’t a Stacy.

Then you don't understand hypergamy. Yes, she settles for less in a relationship - that's the realistic compromise she makes in the interim to satisfy things like pair bonding (however much is still possible after x number of sex partners) and countering loneliness. However, her innate desire to seek chad and get his seed will continue its need to be sated. And like greed, it has no limit.

Relationships are superficial at their core, and are predicated on convenience and one's available options. Most humans, if given the choice, would only pursue the top 20% of the other gender because that is the pathetic superficiality of our sexual nature as a species.

Yes, relationships are indeed predicated on superficiality and availiablity. None of this is a refutation of the sub8 law.

 

[ItsOver4cel]

Imagine thinking chadlites are on the same level as your avg .co user

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

https://incels.is/threads/reminder-the-average-smv-of-a-landwhale.163690/

A bunch of thirsty cucks we can’t even see the faces of don’t count as evidence dude. No one with a Chad-tier face would waste their time on that fat chick unless they had a fetish for that sort of thing. Yes they can still get laid, no they do not have access to Chad.

You only need think about it for a second, if you were a Chad with unlimited options would you really waste any time on her when you have access to Stacies? I wouldn’t even be able to get hard with that girl and I have much less exposure to high quality women than the average Chad.

 

[Personalityinkwell]

A bunch of thirsty cucks we can’t even see the faces of don’t count as evidence dude. No one with a Chad-tier face would waste their time on that fat chick unless they had a fetish for that sort of thing. Yes they can still get laid, no they do not have access to Chad.

You only need think about it for a second, if you were a Chad with unlimited options would you really waste any time on her when you have access to Stacies? I wouldn’t even be able to get hard with that girl and I have much less exposure to high quality women than the average Chad.

cope

 

[GoffSystemQB]

cope

https://incels.is/threads/incel-trait-saying-anything-you-disagree-with-is-a-cope.188598/

lol

 

[Personalityinkwell]

https://incels.is/threads/incel-trait-saying-anything-you-disagree-with-is-a-cope.188598/

lol

thatsthejoke

 

[Ropemaxx]

the difference is you can't fuck stacies while any woman can fuck a Chad and therefore is upset when they get into a relationship with a sub8

Strong but false claim bro. In the community we define chads as 8/10 males. Any woman can fuck a 8/10 male?
No lol, a 4 can maybe fuck a 7 if she is lucky. The general rule is women upgrade a few points, any more and its cherry picking and i could find endless examples of ugly men too. Its still cherrypicking and not the norm or the rule.

https://incels.is/threads/reminder-the-average-smv-of-a-landwhale.163690/

This is not evidence. Anyone can make a pic like this.
If 4/10 woman get chads, chad would have to fuck 8s, 7s, 6s, 5,s, 4s, fat 4s.
He wouldnt have the time, the math is so god damn retarded. There is no study ever on earth showing top 5% fuck 90% of females.

Imagine thinking chadlites are on the same level as your avg .co user

lol, some people seem to think so

 

[Copemaxx]

2000s- sub 7 law
2010s- sub 8 (debatably can start with rise of tinder)
2020s-easily sub 9 law. everyone under 9/10 is fucked.

 

[Personalityinkwell]

Strong but false claim bro. In the community we define chads as 8/10 males. Any woman can fuck a 8/10 male?
No lol, a 4 can maybe fuck a 7 if she is lucky. The general rule is women upgrade a few points, any more and its cherry picking and i could find endless examples of ugly men too. Its still cherrypicking and not the norm or the rule.

This is not evidence. Anyone can make a pic like this.
If 4/10 woman get chads, chad would have to fuck 8s, 7s, 6s, 5,s, 4s, fat 4s.
He wouldnt have the time, the math is so god damn retarded. There is no study ever on earth showing top 5% fuck 90% of females.

lol, some people seem to think so

all I have to say is:

 

[Ropemaxx]

FWIW I don't think this is really near as common for men. I often finds girls that people on here call ugly to be attractive.

There is little point even rating or attempting to rate women for me because I find the vast, vast majority of them attractive and cannot really rate them.

Depends where you live tbh. In my country the women are hot as hell on average and ive seen some horrifying creatures in america being far too common.

all I have to say is:
View attachment 221627

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

cope

I guess even those who are capable of spotting of others’ hypocrisy are not immune to succumbing to it themselves:

https://incels.is/threads/incel-tra...-disagree-with-is-a-cope.188598/#post-4093715

Sigh...

We even discussed in that very thread the fact that people use ‘cope’ even where the belief doesn’t benefit the person in anyway. The options of Chad and obese women’s access to him has absolutely no baring on my life so I am in no way coping by having an opinion on it. Come on man, try to have a little more intellectual integrity next time.

 

[GoffSystemQB]

2000s- sub 7 law
2010s- sub 8 (debatably can start with rise of tinder)
2020s-easily sub 9 law. everyone under 9/10 is fucked.

So every male except for people like Jordan Barrett, Sean O'Pry, Gandy, Chico, etc are fucked? Maybe Nick Bateman is fucked as well?

 

[Personalityinkwell]

I guess even those who are capable of spotting of others’ hypocrisy are not immune to succumbing to it themselves:

https://incels.is/threads/incel-tra...-disagree-with-is-a-cope.188598/#post-4093715

Sigh...

We even discussed in that very thread the fact that people use ‘cope’ even where the belief doesn’t benefit the person in anyway. The options of Chad and obese women’s access to him has absolutely no baring on my life so I am in no way coping by having an opinion on it. Come on man, try to have a little more intellectual integrity next time.

thatsthejoke