Serious Debunking the supposed Debunk of the infamous Okcupid Study

[Misogynist Vegeta]

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/comments/1suqpyf/but_only_10_of_couples_meet_on_a_dating_app_so/


The article here links to a study by pew research which does indeed say that 10% of the couples they interviewed found each other on dating apps, what this bozo doesn't mention is that this includes very old people who met each other, This number jumps up to 20% when you excluded anybody over the age of 30

This of course matches the trends of people meeting each other online

Regardless of whether it's 10% or 40% it doesn't really matter because women don't magically start finding men more attractive when they see them in person, The idea that "a personality" is attractive is quite ridiculous. Sure a woman might fall in love with a man's personality but that will never happen if she is not attracted to that man at all.

 

[GeckoBus]

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/comments/1suqpyf/but_only_10_of_couples_meet_on_a_dating_app_so/


The article here links to a study by pew research which does indeed say that 10% of the couples they interviewed found each other on dating apps, what this bozo doesn't mention is that this includes very old people who met each other, This number jumps up to 20% when you excluded anybody over the age of 30 View attachment 1716460

This of course matches the trends of people meeting each other online
View attachment 1716461

Regardless of whether it's 10% or 40% it doesn't really matter because women don't magically start finding men more attractive when they see them in person, The idea that "a personality" is attractive is quite ridiculous. Sure a woman might fall in love with a man's personality but that will never happen if she is not attracted to that man at all.

i think rehab room had a video on this. Basically these pieces of shit changed the data interpretation and counted people that met IRL on a date after meeting online first as "IRL dates" thus creating this pretense that people werent meeting online. When you fixed that, it turned out that lke 80% of people or more meet online and thats it.

EDIT OMG SO MANY UPVOTES IVE NEVER RECEIVED SO MANY VOOOTES IM COOCMING MY SPERM IS GOINGEVERYHWERE OMG I NEED TO COLLECT MY SPHERM TO MAKE VEGAN PANCAKES NOOO
just kidding, I found the rehab room video:


View: https://youtu.be/CXU9ju8eE_w

2:20 "the graph counts you as having met at a bar or restaurant if you met someone on tinder and later set up a date at a bar or restaurant"

I keep hammering this in for few weeks now - we are dealing with religious zealots, do not expect good faith argumentation, you are arguing against strong emotional blocks, their entire worldview depends on this shit. Thats why they lie like this.

 

[Misogynist Vegeta]

i think rehab room had a video on this. Basically these pieces of shit changed the data interpretation and counted people that met IRL on a date after meeting online first as "IRL dates" thus creating this pretense that people werent meeting online. When you fixed that, it turned out that lke 80% of people or more meet online and thats it.

EDIT OMG SO MANY UPVOTES IVE NEVER RECEIVED SO MANY VOOOTES IM COOCMING MY SPERM IS GOINGEVERYHWERE OMG I NEED TO COLLECT MY SPHERM TO MAKE VEGAN PANCAKES NOOO
just kidding, I found the rehab room video:


View: https://youtu.be/CXU9ju8eE_w

View attachment 1716478

2:20 "the graph counts you as having met at a bar or restaurant if you met someone on tinder and later set up a date at a bar or restaurant"

I keep hammering this in for few weeks now - we are dealing with religious zealots, do not expect good faith argumentation, you are arguing against strong emotional blocks, their entire worldview depends on this shit. Thats why they lie like this.

Wow so it is as bad as I intuitively thought it was.

 

[GeckoBus]

Regardless of whether it's 10% or 40% it doesn't really matter because women don't magically start finding men more attractive when they see them in person, The idea that "a personality" is attractive is quite ridiculous.

you see, cameras being non-magical objects, they cant capture the AURA like a human can with their spiritual spidey senses. I mean, some 900 pound hogs out there just have fabulous aura which is juggernaut law exists, you can have a big personality in a big or small body you see! Actually let me say this and say no more: One time I was walking outside behind a couple and this woman suddenly goes WOHA DID YOU SEE THAT after this 4'5 curry geezer drove past us wearing raybans, a red scarf and a green beanie while listening to linkin park on his segway. WOHA she said WOHA, god almighty, did you see that mans SOUL I WAS ALMOST BLINDED BY HIS SOUL, HOLY SHIT I JUST HAD AN ORGASM RIGHT THERE

she then sprinted to a nearby fence post and, after tearing off her panties, viciously rubbed her spurting pussy on it like a cat in heat while loudly screaming SOUL SOUL SOUL AURA AURA AURA until she finished with a gushing display of female love squirt from her skyward facing pussy, which formed a beautiful rainbow in the gleaming light of our dying sun as it rained down on me and other passerbys.

Her husband applauded BRAVO BRAVO as she tossed her hair back from her red and sweaty face, oh his aura really did me in hubby, she exclaimed, smiling! They then got into their car and drove away, leaving me stunned, shocked, in awe, my mouth agape like I developed lockjaw from sucking dick at the 24 karat glory hole at the world economic forum summit.

 

[GloomyGhoul]

Gaslighting is the only tactic ITfags know. They have no other method of rebuttal except cherrypicking articles

 

[Ambatukam Alone]

View attachment 1716461

40%

And this is a decade old... Also, do the harems formed via foid online communications count as "online" or friends? Friends = online nowadays.

Just go to a restaurant, bro!

 

[Ambatukam Alone]

women don't magically start finding men more attractive when they see them in person, The idea that "a personality" is attractive is quite ridiculous. Sure a woman might fall in love with a man's personality but that will never happen if she is not attracted to that man at all.

Well, there is shit like scent indicating immune system compatibility (I think I saw somewhere online years ago, at least, maybe it's not true). I also find myself attracted to mannerisms/facial expressions/personality, so I'm sure there's some element to that (even if just in the negative sense of giving her the ick by not seeming high status enough, visible autism, etc).

 

[RobertGarnicasAPedo]

I want to add that their attempt to refute this with the "women still messaged less attractive guys" argument is nonsense.

For starters, they were messaging guys THEY rated less attractive, but when graded on a curve, they were still at least average in attractiveness.

Additionally, women barely message on dating apps. The women who do actually send messages are likely hideous, hence they actually have to do some work. They decide that guys who are objectively average are in their league.

Furthermore, the fact that they rate men unattractive but message them anyway only indicates that they're ready for a beta they have no sexual attraction to. Who wants to be in a relationship like that?

 

[hindercel]

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/comments/1suqpyf/but_only_10_of_couples_meet_on_a_dating_app_so/


The article here links to a study by pew research which does indeed say that 10% of the couples they interviewed found each other on dating apps, what this bozo doesn't mention is that this includes very old people who met each other, This number jumps up to 20% when you excluded anybody over the age of 30 View attachment 1716460

This of course matches the trends of people meeting each other online
View attachment 1716461

Regardless of whether it's 10% or 40% it doesn't really matter because women don't magically start finding men more attractive when they see them in person, The idea that "a personality" is attractive is quite ridiculous. Sure a woman might fall in love with a man's personality but that will never happen if she is not attracted to that man at all.

“But it’s online” is their most retarded ass argument.

 

[Grodd]

Gaslighting is the only tactic ITfags know. They have no other method of rebuttal except cherrypicking articles

 

[Pancakecel]

Gaslighting is the only tactic ITfags know. They have no other method of rebuttal except cherrypicking articles