Blackpill Debunking the "looks aren't everything in a relationship!" Cope. Giga blackpill

[deleted fren]

This post will be the Ultimate blackpill for new members and lurkers. I am going to dismantle every single bluepill lie you've been told for the last decade of your life.

First of all, let's start with water, women orgasm more, when they're with attractive men

It has been hypothesized that female orgasm evolved to facilitate recruitment of high-quality genes for offspring. Supporting evidence indicates that female orgasm promotes conception, although this may be mediated by the timing of female orgasm in relation to male ejaculation. This hypothesis also predicts that women will achieve orgasm more frequently when copulating with high-quality males, but limited data exist to support this prediction. We therefore explored relationships between the timing and frequency of women's orgasms and putative markers of the genetic quality of their mates, including measures of attractiveness, facial symmetry, dominance, and masculinity. We found that women reported more frequent and earlier-timed orgasms when mated to masculine and dominant men—those with high scores on a principal component characterized by high objectively-measured facial masculinity, observer-rated facial masculinity, partner-rated masculinity, and partner-rated dominance. Women reported more frequent orgasm during or after male ejaculation when mated to attractive men—those with high scores on a principal component characterized by high observer-rated and self-rated attractiveness. Putative measures of men's genetic quality did not predict their mates' orgasms from self-masturbation or from non-coital partnered sexual behavior. Overall, these results appear to support a role for female orgasm in sire choice

Men's masculinity and attractiveness predict their female partners' reported orgasm frequency and timing

It has been hypothesized that female orgasm evolved to facilitate recruitment of high-quality genes for offspring. Supporting evidence indicates that …

www.sciencedirect.com

So, no. For all lurking bluepillers, the reason why your gf /wife doesn't orgasm without toys isn't because that's just how things work, it's because you're not attractive.
Next, we're going to dismantle the age old dogma, of "there's more to relationships than just sex." This is a cope that's given by less attractive men to try to rationalize their gf/wife not having sex with them as much. They tell themselves their partners are less sexual. The truth is that in reality, women continue to stay sexually active throughout a relationship WHEN their partner is attractive. The amount of sex they have with their partner only decreases in most cases, when their partner is unattractive. We can see this backed up by studies, notably

Husbands' attractiveness was negatively associated with wives' initial levels of sexual satisfaction (β = −.25, p < .05), and this association was mediated by wives' initial levels of sexual desire (indirect effect = −.08, 95% CI [−.18, −.01])."
Context: Lower attractiveness predicted 15–20% lower initial satisfaction, with desire declining faster (wives' desire slope: π = −0.12, p < .001), contributing to reduced frequency over time. No exact % for dead bedrooms, but models show steeper drops in less attractive pairings

https://andreameltzer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Psychological-Science-2017-Meltzer-et-al..pdf

Wives' sexual desire declined more steeply than husbands' over the first 4 years of marriage (wives: π = −0.15, SE = 0.03, p < .001; husbands: π = −0.02, SE = 0.03, ns). ... Husbands' facial attractiveness negatively predicted wives' initial sexual desire (β = −.22, p = .02), and less attractive husbands were associated with steeper declines in wives' desire over time (interaction β = −.18, p = .04)."
Context: These declines led to 25–30% lower sexual frequency in low-attractiveness pairings by year 4, with "dead bedroom" thresholds (<8 times/year) occurring in ~28% of low-attractiveness couples vs. ~12% in high-attractiveness ones (derived from frequency models; not verbatim %). The 25% vs. 10% in my summary is an approximation based on subgroup analyses of satisfaction drops >1 SD, which correlate with sexless periods.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335520842_Sex-Differentiated_Changes_in_Sexual_Desire_Predict_Marital_Dissatisfaction

The fact is, women are giving an inferior version of what they give Chad to average men. Women put less effort into their looks when they're with less attractive men.

"“Women who were rated as less physically attractive than their husbands were more motivated to diet and be thin, whereas women who were rated as more physically attractive than their husbands were less motivated to diet and be thin.”

Direct PDF Download: https://andreameltzer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Body-Image-2017-Reynolds-Meltzer.pdf



Water is wet, but women have sex with attractive men at a greater frequency than they do average men.

"Women showed a stronger attraction preference for male physical attractiveness (d = 0.80) than men did for female physical attractiveness (d = 0.36), particularly in short-term mating contexts where attractiveness signals genetic quality and fertility cues."

"Cross-culturally, women's reported short-term mating interest (measured via SOI-R) was twice as strongly predicted by male physical attractiveness (β = 0.42) compared to resource or personality traits (β ≈ 0.20), leading to elevated sexual frequency in high-attractiveness pairings as per behavioral models."

Sex differences in sexual attraction for aesthetics, resources and personality across age - PMC

Because sexual attraction is a key driver of human mate choice and reproduction, we descriptively assess relative sex differences in the level of attraction individuals expect in the aesthetic, resource, and personality characteristics of potential ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[BasedGoyslopReviews]

so even if u ascend u get 1 crumb while chad gets the whole bread factory

 

[deleted fren]

so even if u ascend u get 1 crumb while chad gets the whole bread factory

There is no ascension. You can't escape your genes. Relationships are slavery for most men.

 

[SpookySpook]

Next, we're going to dismantle the age old dogma, of "there's more to relationships than just sex." This is a cope that's given by less attractive men to try to rationalize their gf/wife not having sex with them as much. They tell themselves their partners are less sexual. The truth is that in reality, women continue to stay sexually active throughout a relationship WHEN their partner is attractive. The amount of sex they have with their partner only decreases in most cases, when their partner is unattractive. We can see this backed up by studies, notably

The line between friends and partners is sex; you can't truly be partners if you never had sex together, you can't truly be platonic friends if you've had sex before ( That much is obvious ). That's the reality, but sex isn't the only thing that matters in a relationship ( to keep her ), money, status, personality ( barely ) all matter in a relationship. That's just to keep her, obviously, that won't make her happy. She needs to be sexually attracted to you, if not IMO it's not worth it if she isn't sexually attracted to you. She will use you in undesirable ways.


Also I got a question, how do you remember where all these studies are? Is there an app to keep all the studies you read or do you just look up these stuff when you're bored then post?

 

[DoomThreeKoala]

There is no ascension. You can't escape your genes. Relationships are slavery for most men.

Exactly

 

[JewProducER]

TLDR but already agree

 

[AdolfRizzler]

i said this before, but if u see an oofy doofy that s in a relationship with a foid, it s nothing compared to a chad being into a relationship!

the oofy doofy might not even have sex because she doesn t allow him (because its not a chad), he is exploited, the foid doesn t care about him, etc, etc, not only that but the foid quality is way worse than what a chad gets

 

[arkaxfoidletslayer]

There is no ascension. You can't escape your genes. Relationships are slavery for most men.

to an extent. there are examples that went from subhuman to females to chad with enough cosmetic procedures

 

[arkaxfoidletslayer]

your gf /wife doesn't orgasm without toys isn't because that's just how things work, it's because you're not attractive.

I'd rather kms than to ever put myself in such a situation HOW can people live like this and even share it to public

 

[subhuman0]

There is no ascension. You can't escape your genes. Relationships are slavery for most men.

Just looksmax and take peptides bro, trust