I haven't seen the survivor show he talks about but i'm sure this guy's reaching. Seems like a circonvoluted and cowardly way to avoid saying that everything he denounces - women replacing men and men becoming subservient to women - is mainly a byproduct of the one real modern religion that is egalitarianism.
Now was/is classical masculinity under attack, and do women sometimes unfairly compete with men with the backing of society ? Yes, but it has nothing to do with some beta male/alpha male thing.
Everyone knows that feminism happened from the top down, not from the bottom up. But weren't socially dominant men from the upper classes - thus married to feminists and supportive of them - the "alphas" of their time ?
Yes, they were, and, at that, in times when classical masculinity was the absolute norm !Also, a quick glance at contemporary gender dynamics in traditionaly masculine sectors women have a proclivity for, like, for example, the judiciary, confirms this : in France 71% of the judges are women, but almost all of the top positions are still occupied by men because they require more competitiveness and sacrifices, that is long hours of work and geographical mobility, so wahmen dont compete well. Faced with this, the gals are asking for quotas to feminize the top positions ; does that seem like disposing of the "alphas" with the help of the "betas" ? Because it rather looks like they first disposed of the "betas" (being now 71% strong at the base) with the approval of the "alphas" (allowing women to enter the judiciary), "alphas" they now want to beat with the help of quotas ONLY AFTER they disposed of the "betas" with the help of the "alphas" ; again, from the top down and not from the bottom up.
So his reasoning completely falls apart whether it's from a historical perspective or even from current gender dynamics perspective. This vid seems like dumb evo-psych shit that only divides men even further.
But it goes deeper and i'll need like one or two asides.
Notice how, in the example i gave, the women are simply too lazy to do the necessary work in order to feminize the top positions of the judiciary. Yes, they're not incompetent, but simply lazy ! And yet they have no shame at all in calling for men's replacement by women. My point is that this is further proof ; there's no need for a scheme between women and "betas" to undermine the "alphas", hell, there's no even need for "competition" cause a blatant and shameless GIBSMEDAT in the form of DEI will do for them. It's like the simplicity of women's entitlement and their inherent hostility towards men go beyond his head... or maybe he's too chicken shit to call it out, as such observations albeit real are deeply offensive to egalitarianism.
And regarding "betas" being at the top and the feminization of society at large, did you know that cheerleading and flight attendance were originally male dominated ? But the moment they let women enter, masculine representation CRUMBLED, and this is the early 20th century we're talking about ! Again, no "alphas-betas" involved, simply an imbalance because femininity devoured the men symbolically and esthetically as they couldnt stand the comparison ; now, the only men in those activities will not only be rare but will HAVE TO be feminized if they want to do them. The giveaway here is that it's egalitarianism in and of itself that feminizes society, just as it did in those microcosms ; if, in the span of a few decades - decades that just happen to coincide with women's rise in power both effectively and symbolically - the leaders typically changed from Charles de Gaule or Churchill to obnoxious, absolutely excessive and obscene technocratic worms like Macron or Trudeau - something unprecedented in history of mankind - then you can be sure it's not an accident at all. And yet there were no "beta men" conspiring with women to put wimps into power, last time i checked ; it's an organic process resulting from modernization and egalitarianism, but the first factor, modernization, couldn't justify the dynamic by itself given that the 30's and 40's were already very advanced and, by the way, those men - De Gaule and Churchill - were from upper classes just like Macron and Trudeau. Therefore it is egalitarianism that plays a crucial role in not only feminizing soyciety - something feminists and their guard dogs at least admit to - but also in weakening and transforming men into eunuchs. "Equality", as Cato the Elder said around FUCKING 200 BC, is bound to make women our masters ; the fact it could have happened to our forefathers in such distant times is proof that feminine dominance and the feminization of men are less about the chemicals in the food and water rather than thorough psychic castration resulting from egalitarianism, whose effects are multidimensional, prolonged over generations and bound to produce soyjaks on an industrial scale ; egalitarianism most definitely destroyed the family unit and our archetypal representations so, all things considered and whether you were fatherless, had a good dad or a shit dad, a weak dad or a strong dad, your individual case is marginal in front of changes of such magnitude. Everything is impacted by the awful murder of the pater familias.
So talking points of that caliber (muh chemicals, muh t-levels, muh alphas and betas) act like involuntary psyop type psychic waste that only blur the lines ; i dont know if it's just men being ignorant or not coming to term that men's dignity vs egalitarianism absolutely IS a zero sum game.
Foids will say otherwise when everything seems to indicate that judges in my country will end up being women up to 90% base and top positions combined in the next decades, all while women are advantaged socially, culturally, legally and collectively look at us non-Chad men like dirt, talk about equality ! History will remember us incels as the only wise men of our time, the only ones who didn't bow down to gynocracy, not the crypto-cuck in this video nor cringe men sent their own way but us enamored radicals right about our cosmic entitlement to your love, to your frivolous grace and cute feminine mutinous airs, to your emotional and domestic support, to your admiration and, ultimately, to your bodies !
