Imagine you hold up two stones. One has a sharper edge and it is nearly identical to the duller edged stone. But then you hold the duller edged stone stone from the fucking moon and you love it more because it came from outer space.
That's how women value men. The pedigree that lies beneath something/ the look, and feel, and vast abstract depth something holds underlyingly than the concretes of something.
A determinate feature in a man is that his genetics, money, status, family background, reputation, etc. all have a form of regality behind it that women feel strong/ happy/ important/ etc. to be associate with.
Women are regality stalkers and because of that, looksmaxxing makes you seem small and pathetic if they find out everything you are is not natural but just produced.
Women want to feel what it's like when you hold up a moon rock. That there is an indescribable but dynamic depth to things.
That desire to be a part of that grandness will vastly outweigh anything that PUA "game" can possibly have.
Women cheat on their husbands who have PHDs and are happily raising their babies becuase they want to be a part of the pedigree of a bad ass predator. To women good and evil is irrelevant. Only those who have the pedigree of a powerful person get to be the ones they esteem. And all else that isn't that is just a cope/ false portrayal of a person.
Right Frame, Right Mindstructure, Right Conduct, Right Livelihood, speech, demeanor, etc.
The primarch value they want inherent in suitorship is the essence of many evils committed in this world.
The blackpill of it being all about looks is only half true. True, but there is more to it.
If you have two guys of the same face/ body structure... who are chad but look identical.
Then let's say one of them is a king, one of them has great reflexes, is a doctor, and former pro football player.
And the other guy is kind of a social outcast, and is kinda awkward, and says he likes to eat cheese randomly.
Clearly the pedigree of the former creates the greater primarchal portrait that the girl projects upon him because there's a greater halo effect.
Often do LOOKS outweigh many things. But it's only because women are constantly trying to forge the proper suitor out of the MAN-terials around her.
Nonmalleable features are the most essential elements in man-terials. And so they will go for whoever is closest to making the optics work. But autism/ dorkyism can be a reversing factor.
The pedigree of refined facial features/ refined body structure often outweigh the pedigree of having a good job/ good house if you're a balding beaner.
So a woman is more likely to pick the man-terial of a chad who doesn't do shit with his life and smokes weed. Because of the pedigree of his genetics being good man-terial for her to create her final socializing/ human image build.
Even if the chad still doesn't do shit, and the beaner is more alpha when it comes to his lifestyle... the pedigree a girl wants based off the implication of the chad's genetics will create a deeper judgment halo effect. Because often people loan power of the notion that people who are natural born win at life, and tryhards like hard working beaners are just fighting an uphill, destined to lose battle.
That's the reason women like the looks/ sensatonalism of things rather than how things work and apply.
Women are not healthy for society really.
They just want to be in the razzle-dazzle pristineness that comes from a squeaky clean insulation, and a smug grin upon those who don't have as much. They mock at those of coarseness.
That's how women value men. The pedigree that lies beneath something/ the look, and feel, and vast abstract depth something holds underlyingly than the concretes of something.
A determinate feature in a man is that his genetics, money, status, family background, reputation, etc. all have a form of regality behind it that women feel strong/ happy/ important/ etc. to be associate with.
Women are regality stalkers and because of that, looksmaxxing makes you seem small and pathetic if they find out everything you are is not natural but just produced.
Women want to feel what it's like when you hold up a moon rock. That there is an indescribable but dynamic depth to things.
That desire to be a part of that grandness will vastly outweigh anything that PUA "game" can possibly have.
Women cheat on their husbands who have PHDs and are happily raising their babies becuase they want to be a part of the pedigree of a bad ass predator. To women good and evil is irrelevant. Only those who have the pedigree of a powerful person get to be the ones they esteem. And all else that isn't that is just a cope/ false portrayal of a person.
Right Frame, Right Mindstructure, Right Conduct, Right Livelihood, speech, demeanor, etc.
The primarch value they want inherent in suitorship is the essence of many evils committed in this world.
The blackpill of it being all about looks is only half true. True, but there is more to it.
If you have two guys of the same face/ body structure... who are chad but look identical.
Then let's say one of them is a king, one of them has great reflexes, is a doctor, and former pro football player.
And the other guy is kind of a social outcast, and is kinda awkward, and says he likes to eat cheese randomly.
Clearly the pedigree of the former creates the greater primarchal portrait that the girl projects upon him because there's a greater halo effect.
Often do LOOKS outweigh many things. But it's only because women are constantly trying to forge the proper suitor out of the MAN-terials around her.
Nonmalleable features are the most essential elements in man-terials. And so they will go for whoever is closest to making the optics work. But autism/ dorkyism can be a reversing factor.
The pedigree of refined facial features/ refined body structure often outweigh the pedigree of having a good job/ good house if you're a balding beaner.
So a woman is more likely to pick the man-terial of a chad who doesn't do shit with his life and smokes weed. Because of the pedigree of his genetics being good man-terial for her to create her final socializing/ human image build.
Even if the chad still doesn't do shit, and the beaner is more alpha when it comes to his lifestyle... the pedigree a girl wants based off the implication of the chad's genetics will create a deeper judgment halo effect. Because often people loan power of the notion that people who are natural born win at life, and tryhards like hard working beaners are just fighting an uphill, destined to lose battle.
That's the reason women like the looks/ sensatonalism of things rather than how things work and apply.
Women are not healthy for society really.
They just want to be in the razzle-dazzle pristineness that comes from a squeaky clean insulation, and a smug grin upon those who don't have as much. They mock at those of coarseness.
Last edited:
