Since I know you guys are lurking, here’s how you can end the blackpill community: Actually debunk the blackpill! Here’s the link:
The Scientific Blackpill is about understanding the nature of human social and sexual behavior with a particular focus on evolutionary psychological perspectives...
incels.wiki
Now either refute everything it says, or provide a counter list of studies. Prove that inceldom really is our fault and tell us step-by-step how to get a girlfriend as an ugly guy. Since you’re so dedicated to countering digital hate, and since the blackpill is obviously wrong and you’re obviously right, it shouldn’t be too hard.
They will always find a way.
I argue with people online on all kinds of topics. Let's say we are talking black crime rates. And I show pitbulls as an example of an animal that was both bred for dog fighting and is by far the most violent kind of dog around:
My implication being: If a dog can be genetically predispositioned for violence, why couldn't the same be true of a person or race?
They will then just claim that "violent people buy these dogs because they have a bad reputation, it's the fault of the owners and society for stereotyping these dogs as killing machines.
They will feel no need to try and proof their prefered direction of causality, they will leave it to me to disproof it instead...
And if I were to manage that somehow, they would simply just say "well, pitbulls aren't humans" and start denying that humans races are even meaningfully differend below the skin.
They will just keep jumping from bad argument to bad argument until I can't answer one on the spot and then they think they have won.
When people want to believe something they ask "Can I believe it?"
But when they don't want to believe something they ask "Do I have to believe it?"
And you almost never have to.
These academics and lower level ideologues feel completely certain about their believes because they know that all of higher society is on their side and that is how normies mostly judge the world and their place in it.
"Is believing this high status?"
They look at who is making a claim instead of the details of what is being said. As such, there is simply no way that they would side with us societal outcasts over accomplished professors and intellectuals. No matter what we say. They will make up some more or less plausible counter argument, we will never get to hear it or interact with it and they will feel a renewed sense of righteousness.
The race debate has been going on for ages. The arguments have long been pointing in one direction, overwhelmingly so, but they do not care. Deep down they are normies, automatic status seeking missles in human form, and they will not go against their prime directive. Neither will they feel bad for following it. It's simply their nature as neurotypical, overly agreeable midwits.
They will find some weak point, real or fake, and latch on to it as absolute proof, they will not take in the whole totality of the evidence and ask "Given everything I see, what is the most likely explanation?"
