Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Dating is the most pure form of natural selection and Darwinism.

L

LEzackcel

Greycel
Joined
Jan 16, 2025
Posts
45
In the dating world, there is no such thing as ''love'', ''emotional connection'', or ''personality''. Its ALL genetics, and a ruthless competition for survival.

Women will look for:
-Physical attractiveness (facial symmetry, height, sharp jawline etc etc)
-Markers of success (social status, money)
-Personality (humor, intelligence etc)

People will say that women are far less shallow when it comes at picking partners.
But this isnt quite true.
Both personality and markers of success are based on genetic predispositions as well as the environment. A smart man is born smart, and through hard work, he is able to achieve total success. A less smart man, no matter how hard he tries, will always fail.

Hard work is only relevant if you are already genetically gifted.
 
Not necessarily. Female dating preferences can in fact be dysgenic when you take fisherian runaway into account
 
>A smart man is born smart, and through hard work, he is able to achieve total success. A less smart man, no matter how hard he tries, will always fail.

Intelligence doesn't even matter, without connections even being able to survive is a bit of a pipe dream
 
Exactly, I would argue that giving women total freedom in procreation leads to dysgenics.
They select for traits that are animalistic, not what is good for civilization.

Thus, the West has fallen becomes a meme.
 
Another "women want chads" thread. That's something everyone know since early 2010s
 
Not necessarily. Female dating preferences can in fact be dysgenic when you take fisherian runaway into account
Indeed, super tall height actually makes men less healthy with no practical advantage. This is just one example of it
 
Not necessarily. Female dating preferences can in fact be dysgenic when you take fisherian runaway into account
Exactly, I would argue that giving women total freedom in procreation leads to dysgenics.
Why would it be dysgenic if it increases an organism's chance of reproduction even if it reduces their life expectancy a bit?
 
Why would it be dysgenic if it increases an organism's chance of reproduction even if it reduces their life expectancy a bit?
In humans, it can lead to men who are antisocial and otherwise mentally unfit reproducing and passing on their genes to their children. This is maladaptive in the long term
 
In humans, it can lead to men who are antisocial and otherwise mentally unfit reproducing and passing on their genes to their children. This is maladaptive in the long term
oh ok, I'm assuming your referring to women's alleged preference for dark triad?
 

Similar threads

L
Replies
11
Views
397
TheJester
TheJester
KillNiggers
Replies
42
Views
802
SrutalBeggs
SrutalBeggs
genericrevival
Replies
13
Views
211
JKlancecaster069
JKlancecaster069
Clavicus Vile
Replies
11
Views
968
A.M.
A.M.
Kamanbert
Replies
1
Views
302
Kamanbert
Kamanbert

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top