lifefuel
Anti-White Propagandist
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017
- Posts
- 9,596

All good things come to an endI will never watch slavshit wojak videos, cocomelon for incels.
It would be good for society.
As a Hindu, I oppose killing wild animals for entertainmentIt would be good for society.
i would be okay with an open source AI companion, but you just know anything owned by a corporation will nickel and dime you, rob you, and spy on youIf you grew up with lifelike AIs as potential partners it wouldn’t even seem weird to you and you wouldn’t feel bad about it. It’s only because we know how things are supposed to be that it seems such an awful cope
Islam has polygyny and Nazism has harem mansions for SS officers.we gotta create an islamo-fashist state to live in before this shit happens
fashism =/= nazismIslam has polygyny and Nazism has harem mansions for SS officers.
The only solution is Incelistan with Marxism Rodgerism
fashism =/= nazism
fashism = national syndicalism (a form of socialism, unionism in it´s extremest form basically)
In fashism/national syndicalism the state basically acts as one big union controlling the means of production, pretty similar to leninism/stalinism.
It is a form of socialism, of decentralised collectivism, with local unions being supervised by unions on a provincial level, which in turn are supervised by national unions, which in turn are intertwined with the state. This state on the other hand has the means of production and the property, including the means of reproduction, culture, the media... in it´s iron grip.
The fashist state is controlled by a strong dictator (preferably me)
There is de facto no free market, because all companies, banks etc. have to be intertwined with the state owned unions as well. It´s basically a extreme form of reverse lobbyism where the state infiltrates all companies and all private matters in general.
There is some private ownership in fashism, but again, the companies and therefore the produced goods are all controlled by the state.
Many historians to this day argue that stalinism and maoism were forms of fashism, not communism, the only difference being the internationalist agenda that those states applied.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdY_IMZH2Ko
fashism =/= nazism
fashism = national syndicalism (a form of socialism, unionism in it´s extremest form basically)
In fashism/national syndicalism the state basically acts as one big union controlling the means of production, pretty similar to leninism/stalinism.
It is a form of socialism, of decentralised collectivism, with local unions being supervised by unions on a provincial level, which in turn are supervised by national unions, which in turn are intertwined with the state. This state on the other hand has the means of production and the property, including the means of reproduction, culture, the media... in it´s iron grip.
The fashist state is controlled by a strong dictator (preferably me)
There is de facto no free market, because all companies, banks etc. have to be intertwined with the state owned unions as well. It´s basically a extreme form of reverse lobbyism where the state infiltrates all companies and all private matters in general.
There is some private ownership in fashism, but again, the companies and therefore the produced goods are all controlled by the state.
Many historians to this day argue that stalinism and maoism were forms of fashism, not communism, the only difference being the internationalist agenda that those states applied.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdY_IMZH2Ko
i as a fellow balkanoid montenigger have to admit tito was somewhat based.decentralised Yugoslav Socialism
big difference between communist manifesto and stalin/maoBig difference between any written Fascist Manifesto or Strasserite Manifesto compared to what Mussolini and Hitler actually did
big difference between fashist italy/spain and nazi germanyBig difference between decentralised Yugoslav Socialism and centralised USSR socialism when compared to Nazi Germany or Mussolini's Italy
This guys political orientation is as yellow as a gook, i have to admit that. But about 60-70% of his definition of fashism is accurate in my eyes.You lost all credibility by citing a libertarian/anarcho-capitalist like Tik.
The word "privatisation" was literally coined to describe the Nazi policy of giving banks back to the capitalist class
fashism =/= nazism
It has been great for human race, it increased the productive forces and created a striking division of society into two contrasting classes.The industrial revolution has been a disaster for the human race
It has torn apart our veil of ignorance and showed us the truth of what we humans really areIt has been great for human race, it increased the productive forces and created a striking division of society into two contrasting classes.
I've read both Technological Slavery and Unabomber manifesto, it has not changed my views on industrialization at all.It has torn apart our veil of ignorance and showed us the truth of what we humans really are
Going backwards will just cause us to end up here again. What we must do is control HOW we go forward.
Wanting to go backwards is reactionary, our society and socioeconomic dynamics will not remain stationary in time. As soon as progress is made (which is inevitable) we will reach same conditions that surround us today.Going backwards will just cause us to end up here again. What we must do is control HOW we go forward.
If anything it only has augmented my contempt for capitalism.I've read both Technological Slavery and Unabomber manifesto, it has not changed my views on industrialization at all.
"Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended, either in a revolutionary re-constitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes.”Wanting to go backwards is reactionary, our society and socioeconomic dynamics will not remain stationary in time. As soon as progress is made (which is inevitable) we will reach same conditions that surround us today.





