"Feminism will improve the gene pool brah"
.
[/UWSL]
Is kinda weird because is true that we are harmful for natural selection but society doesn´t allow us to use our best survival weapon that is physical prowess.
Most of these women are not even facially impressive. They are just running a blonde blue eyed halo effect and even then. There is no way 20+ year old women have such bright blonde hair. Natural blonde hair gets darker with years. By 40 most blonde people are almost brown haired.
Ok, "pro-darwinism" then, how about it?
[UWSL]You don't even know what a "darwinist" is
being blackpilled is understanding that all chads and incels alike should be sterilized if not euthanized
Ok faggot
self hating retards. let me guess you're real happy about the fact that your parents were able to procreate and bring you into this wonderful life
an underappreciated factERing Chads and Stacies is Darwinism
yes. the ideal existence if you have to be born at all is to be inside the womb of a fat rich bitch when she's instantaneously vaporized by a nuke right above her head. if you're so attached to life you don't regret being born, you must have copes I can only dream of
they are the most inconsistent brainlets
The reason why Iceland is safe and functional is because it's a homogenous, monocultural country. There are a lot of others countries like that, Japan comes to mind, but most Japanese wouldn't be described as Chad/Chang but rather as "subhuman manlet ricecels" or whatever.
Yeah my point is not that liberalism or feminism makes for great countries, it's that it doesn't matter. It's only ugly hairy brown manlets from Afghanistan (also a monoethnic and monocultural country by the way) and Iraq (same here) etc. that want to completely control their women. Same for India with their rapes. If you have evolution on your side (race mostly, but on an individual level race is not enough, you need good genes relative to your race) anything is possible.
Those Middle Eastern countries have a lot of ethinic divisions and above all religious divisions, which cause a lot of problems since their religions are imperialistic and violent. But as far as women go, they're better off than any western country. They surely aren't struggling with unsustainable birth rates either.
I don't believe physically attractive people are necessarily better genetically and let alone in women's hypergamy going unchecked as something positive.
Those countries are violent, retarded shitholes with people exploding everywhere 24/7. What makes them better exactly? Having lots of children isn't good. It's only good if you literally live in Africa and 60% of your children die and you need more to work on a farm. Less children = more resources for everyone. That's why small countries like Sweden, Finland etc. are so great. Is it a coincidence shitholes like Afghanistan are full of ugly brown manlets and Iceland is full of blue eyes blonde eyed stacies? Is it a coincidence rich people often look great and poor people look inbred? No, it's all related.
Yes, but that's due to the reasons I gave. Ethnic and especially religious tensions.
"Better" might be a stretch, but they aren't gynocentric feminist dystopias like the west.
But having few children is not sustainable in the long run. It's not a coincidence that Islam is gradually taking Europe.
It's a racial difference, I agree that whites are better-looking on average, but I don't know why. There are white people in Afghanistan as well, though.
Those elites of the world like Soros, Rockefeller, etc, look more inbred to me than the average joe on the street tbh.
Not necessarily IMO. The blackpill's main point is that looks matter a lot in society and especially with women, but to conclude from this that more physically attractive people are better in every way and everyone who's ugly is subhuman genetic trash and deserves not to reproduce/die is a stretch to say the least.
That's not really the point. The brutal blackpill though is that you cannot force genuine sexual attraction. Not by opressing foids and not by gymcel coping.
But i don´t care about genuine attraction. Foids are animals, not humans. They were made to please us. What such inferior creatures think/care does not matter
he's talking about people like stormcucks that worship guys like Andres Brevik getting congujal visits to secure the white race
You still have no idea what "darwinism" means
Most of you seem to be lowiqcels tbh
Darwin's theory makes no judgement of what is or isn't better for particular species. It just states the fact that the environment exerts pressure on living beings and selects some traits over others. It's merely descriptive, not prescriptive. Plus it's a logical truth derived from the facts of genetic and environmental variation.
guns - we exist
100% true.
