Based Daily Reminder: Women Are Sex Objects

[Nagisa_Shingetsu]

I don’t know why society considers them ‘human’, the only reason why foids exist are to be used as tools for the pleasure of men. They should’ve never been given rights and society needs to go back 100s of years ago where women were property instead of actual humans with rights. (Sorry that I haven’t been posting regularly brocels, I’ve been busy with school/work these past few months.)

 

[Ibrahim997]

Are me sex objects?

 

[SCAT PACK]

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

go back a 100 years were women were property instead of actual humans with rights.

I'm not sure about that 100 years tbh. This movie about a female company president regularly inviting her Chad employees to her mansion to use them as sex objects by getting them drunk with vodka and sending them away when they get attached will be 100 years old in less than a decade after all.

Female

Female is a 1933 American drama film directed by Michael Curtiz and starring Ruth Chatterton. It is a good example of the more "adult" tone struck by Hollywood films in The Pre-Code Era—any film produced after The Hays Code was enforced in …

tvtropes.org

 

[LastGerman]

@GeckoBus

 

[TheJester]

I don’t know why society considers them ‘human’, the only reason why foids exist are to be used as tools for the pleasure of men. They should’ve never been given rights and society needs to go back a 100 years were women were property instead of actual humans with rights. (Sorry that I haven’t been posting regularly brocels, I’ve been busy with school/work these past few months.)

More like 500 years.

 

[Nagisa_Shingetsu]

I'm not sure about that 100 years tbh. This movie about a female company president regularly inviting her Chad employees to her mansion to use them as sex objects by getting them drunk with vodka and sending them away when they get attached will be 100 years old in less than a decade after all.

Female

Female is a 1933 American drama film directed by Michael Curtiz and starring Ruth Chatterton. It is a good example of the more "adult" tone struck by Hollywood films in The Pre-Code Era—any film produced after The Hays Code was enforced in …

tvtropes.org

My bad, I meant to say 100s of years ago. Thanks for pointing out the error.

 

[parahoy]

I don’t know why society considers them ‘human’, the only reason why foids exist are to be used as tools for the pleasure of men. They should’ve never been given rights and society needs to go back a 100 years were women were property instead of actual humans with rights. (Sorry that I haven’t been posting regularly brocels, I’ve been busy with school/work these past few months.)

Not necessarily 100 years ago but based post. Women seriously need to get over this equal nonsense. It’s embedded in our bodies that men are superior to women. Their only purpose is breeding and nursing their babies.

 

[GeckoBus]

@GeckoBus

I am summoned, endor is the name.
I would only ask this question: If human relations are determined by looks, not law, as we are so apt to point out, then why would people at any point in history treat women different than now? Were tall men not privileged in the past? Were people not enamored with attractive women and men? Why would women not enjoy similar social privileges as they do today? Was the male sex drive lower back then? That is all.

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

My bad, I meant to say 100s of years ago. Thanks for pointing out the error.

No problem.

 

[Nagisa_Shingetsu]

Not necessarily 100 years ago but based post. Women seriously need to get over this equal nonsense. It’s embedded in our bodies that men are superior to women. Their only purpose is breeding and nursing their babies.

Correct

 

[Yournotcold0]

Based pfp reminded me of danganropa 2

 

[Yabadadabadoo]

This y yu inkel, they also know how to cook and clean!!