vargstrike
Recruit
★★
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2017
- Posts
- 153
I don't hate them, but some of them hate me.
fuck offyungblackcell said:cell.Krispinwah said:>a black person telling other races they smell
woke_nigga said:fuck off
learn your incel grammar, plebyungblackcell said:Fuck off yourselfwoke_nigga said:fuck off
Krispinwah said:I guess first one is Korean as he has the K pop look, second one is Japanese because of the narrow face and third is Chinese.
“The actual problem is with you, trying to prove pakis are better than "x" or "y" or "z".“ this shows you have an inferiority complex, I have never said Pakistanis are better than Indians, I have just said they are different. There is no superiority implied by stating that different ethnic groups are not the same. Does saying Egyptians and Nigerians are different imply one is better? No, it’s just stating what is correct.
And this has nothing to do with Indians and Pakis because its not relevant, they have completely different genetics and genetic differences, saying “because Chinese and Japanese people look the same therefore Indians and Pakistanis also must” is just retarded
chudurbudur said:Yup, me too have seen some bangladeshi guys amogging curries but they are also rare. Anyway, the same rule holds, bangladesh, indian and paki they belong to the same ethnicity, no one can tell the difference. A curry is curry.
woke_nigga said:learn your incel grammar, pleb
Krispinwah said:I guess first one is Korean as he has the K pop look, second one is Japanese because of the narrow face and third is Chinese.
“The actual problem is with you, trying to prove pakis are better than "x" or "y" or "z".“ this shows you have an inferiority complex, I have never said Pakistanis are better than Indians, I have just said they are different. There is no superiority implied by stating that different ethnic groups are not the same. Does saying Egyptians and Nigerians are different imply one is better? No, it’s just stating what is correct.
And this has nothing to do with Indians and Pakis because its not relevant, they have completely different genetics and genetic differences, saying “because Chinese and Japanese people look the same therefore Indians and Pakistanis also must” is just retarded
I didn’t reverse image search, I literally explained my reasoning with the physical traits the races portray which I explained before you even posted the pictures. And JFL and you trying to make me play guessing games until I get one wrong, in no way do these three guys portray the average faces of their countries they’re just random people you have chosen this is meaningless. If it makes you feel better I’ll guess Bangladesh Pakistan Indiachudur-budur said:Fucking liar, surely you did reverse image search and all of them are top models so easy to find their ethnicity. I want to close this debate once and for all, I am giving you 3 pics of average looking paki, indian and bangladeshi guys, which one is which? You won't be able to differentiate your own fucking ethnicity (btw, all of them are ugly as fuck) --Krispinwah said:I guess first one is Korean as he has the K pop look, second one is Japanese because of the narrow face and third is Chinese.
“The actual problem is with you, trying to prove pakis are better than "x" or "y" or "z".“ this shows you have an inferiority complex, I have never said Pakistanis are better than Indians, I have just said they are different. There is no superiority implied by stating that different ethnic groups are not the same. Does saying Egyptians and Nigerians are different imply one is better? No, it’s just stating what is correct.
And this has nothing to do with Indians and Pakis because its not relevant, they have completely different genetics and genetic differences, saying “because Chinese and Japanese people look the same therefore Indians and Pakistanis also must” is just retarded
chudur-budur said:BS, which one is which?
Can you tell the difference without doing any kind of reverse image search?
I am not suffering from any inferiority complex because I am not trying to prove indians are better than "x". The actual problem is with you, trying to prove pakis are better than "x" or "y" or "z". It's exactly like an aborigine from tonga is trying to prove he is better looking than a tasmanian aborigine, the fact is that both are ugly and no one can see any difference. Above all, no one cares. JFL
And why it has nothing to do with indians and pakis? I don't understand. Once you say they differ, again you say it has nothing to do with this comparison.
Where exactly did I say southern curries look similar to pakis? Please read the whole conversation before making any comment.
This is what I am exactly doing from the beginning, I am trying to say there is no difference between pakis and indians, at the end of the day a curry is a curry. And curries are the top tier incels.
Krispinwah said:I didn’t reverse image search, I literally explained my reasoning with the physical traits the races portray which I explained before you even posted the pictures. And JFL and you trying to make me play guessing games until I get one wrong, in no way do these three guys portray the average faces of their countries they’re just random people you have chosen this is meaningless. If it makes you feel better I’ll guess Bangladesh Pakistan India
If they're all Pakistani then I'd be wrong on two, not all three. What are you talking about? Anyway this was a trick question you said there was one from each race, not that all of them could be any. Last two have some Caucasian features and look Pakistani. Not really the first one. What's your point? Three random people are meant to represent the average features 193.2 million people? What made these three so special to represent this?chudur-budur said:JFL, no you are wrong at all three. All of them are pakis, they are taken from the "UIUC Pakistani Student Association" page on fb, see their "Photos" page you will find them all. They all look like these.Krispinwah said:I didn’t reverse image search, I literally explained my reasoning with the physical traits the races portray which I explained before you even posted the pictures. And JFL and you trying to make me play guessing games until I get one wrong, in no way do these three guys portray the average faces of their countries they’re just random people you have chosen this is meaningless. If it makes you feel better I’ll guess Bangladesh Pakistan India
Krispinwah said:If they're all Pakistani then I'd be wrong on two, not all three. What are you talking about? Anyway this was a trick question you said there was one from each race, not that all of them could be any. Last two have some Caucasian features and look Pakistani. Not really the first one. What's your point? Three random people are meant to represent the average features 193.2 million people? What made these three so special to represent this?
Krispinwah said:If they're all Pakistani then I'd be wrong on two, not all three. What are you talking about? Anyway this was a trick question you said there was one from each race, not that all of them could be any. Last two have some Caucasian features and look Pakistani. Not really the first one. What's your point? Three random people are meant to represent the average features 193.2 million people? What made these three so special to represent this?
dardycunt said:Pakistani and Indian are nationalities, not ethnicities. Therefore, it would not make any sense to demarcate subcontinental demographics by nationality when it would be more accurate to distinguish between actual ethnic groups, such as Sindhis and Gujuratis.
Pakistan is a contrived political monstrosity that does not deserve to have its existence validated anyway, the partition and the 1971 war could have been prevented had the cretins in charge not given risible political ideologies such as the two-nation theory any consideration. Punjab should not have been divided.
If only the British had enacted an eugenics program to cleanse the subcontinent of undesirables. It would be the gentlemanly thing to do after exploiting our resources and inflicting famine upon the masses. We wouldn't be having this conversation.
satoshisacuck said:This is what I was saying earlier with my quote that there is genetic variation in South Asia. But Chudurbudur for some reason wants to put everything in one basket.
dardycunt said:I suspect that the subcontinental predisposition to low IQ contributes to the dogmatic and unfounded dichotomy between being Pakistani and Indian. I do not even have to make reference to the myriad of multi-ethnic post-colonial states that exist elsewhere - even Afghanistan itself is merely a political construct, just like India and Pakistan.
It would be inaccurate to debate whether Afghans and Pakistanis are identical in terms of looks because those are national-political terms.
One could argue that Afghans and Pakistanis are phenotypically similar by comparing an Afghani Pashtun and a Pakistani Pashtun, but that would be erroneous because the similarity is only due to ethnicity. If someone wanted to misrepresent the ethnic composition of South Asia, they could also try to argue that Pakistanis and Afghanis are fundamentally dissimilar by comparing an Afghani Hazara with a Pakistani Balochi.
lakb said:All curries/pakis/muslims honestly look the same to other people. I can not tell the difference.
Women give less of a shit and you are in the same smelly, low class bucket to them
chudur-budur said:muslim is neither an ethnicity or nationality, never saw a dumbcel before, you are the first of the kind.
lakb said:You all fall in the same low class, smelly bucket. Majority of western people (especially women) do not care to even bother knowing the differences and you all look the same.
NegroKing said:Eh, I have to disagree. The thing about Pakistan and India is that while they are both conglomerations of various ethnicities, they vastly differ in this regard.
India is more like the former USSR where there are many different ethnic groups, many of which have little cultural or genetic connection to one another. This makes sense because there are multiple different geographical zones that define India and hence its cultures.
Pakistan is more like the former Yugoslavia where there are different ethnicities, but there are still strong cultural and genetic similarities between those groups, which makes sense because they are connected with one another and based on the Indus river.
Overall I'd say the Pakistani identity, ironically, is more cohesive than the Indian one.
dardycunt said:Pakistani and Indian are nationalities, not ethnicities. Therefore, it would not make any sense to demarcate subcontinental demographics by nationality when it would be more accurate to distinguish between actual ethnic groups, such as Sindhis and Gujuratis.
Pakistan is a contrived political monstrosity that does not deserve to have its existence validated anyway, the partition and the 1971 war could have been prevented had the cretins in charge not given risible political ideologies such as the two-nation theory any consideration. Punjab should not have been divided.
If only the British had enacted an eugenics program to cleanse the subcontinent of undesirables. It would be the gentlemanly thing to do after exploiting our resources and inflicting famine upon the masses. We wouldn't be having this conversation.
chudur-budur said:Correct. Establishing the ethnic demarcation in the indian subcontinent is still an open problem to anthropologists, yet we can see some sort of racial striation between north and south parts of india. But again everything becomes blur once you see a dravidian looking pakistani or a bengali (the third paki guy in my previous reply has strong dravidian features), although they have less probable genetic tie with the dravidian people. The only way to clearly distinguish the ethnicities in indian subcontinent is to run a haplogroup mapping on a massive scale.
Nothing2Lose said:I'd rope if I was a curry.
Nothing2Lose said:I can live without females..
Nothing2Lose said:Maybe one day. But then I always remember hey, at least I'm not a curry lol.