I actually never thought of it like that, but that’s basically what happened. hER mothER encouraged hER daughtER to exploit the curry for his money/resources, and although the daughtER was 16 (she still knew what she was doing, she knew “right” from “wrong”), so despite hER mothER’s influence, the 16 year old daughtER should still be held accountable for hER actions.
On a side note: this shows you what happens when single mothERs raise children on their own.
Without a fathER figure to instill discipline in the children, the children are NOT taught how to live in accordance to righteous morals and principles (because women lack the intelligence, maturity and self-awareness let alone “good will/intention” to be able to fill the mentor/teachER/guide role of an authoritative male parent/fathER).
That’s why daughtERs of single mothERs r often sluts/gold-digging whores and sons get socially outcasted and rejected by the opposite sex, resulting in them becoming a low level wageslave, losER NEET and in extreme cases mass shootERs.
A society with such high prevalence of single mothER households is doomed for failure
Anyways, going back to the fact that this 16 year old slut should be held responsible for hER actions, this means hER actions INDIRECTLY led to the death of 3 people: hERself at the hands of the curry (who was simply responding in a completely logical mannER to hER cheating, lying whorish exploitation of him, so hER death is on hER own hands), hER mothER (who committed suicide due to sadness at hER daughtER’s death, which we’ve already established was the fault of the daughtER’s actions, so the mothER’s death is the daughtER’s fault too) AND the curry (who committed suicide when he lost his appeal of his life sentence, hER wh0rish exploitation of him being the reason he killed hER and thERefore being the reason he was given a life sentence, so his death was also on hER hands).
This dumb slut INDIRECTLY killed 3 people, it was hER actions which “set in motion” the chain of events which ultimately led to the lives of 3 people (including hERself) being lost. She is to blame for all the pain/suffERing expERienced by the 3 people (including hERself) and any family/loved ones who will be emotionally/mentally (and othERwise) significantly negatively affected by hER actions in the long-tERm, and people r blaming the CURRY for evERything and labelling him a “bad pERson”
As long as society keeps treating women like innocent angels who can do no wrong, as long as women can treat othERs like shit and get away with it (NOT be held accountable for their actions and face punishment for bad deeds), more of these incidents will happen which will result in a rise in genERal violence and chaos in society, all due to the actions of women.
Elliot RodgER was right. Women r like an untamed beast, which if not controlled and restrained, will wreak havoc upon society. It’s no wondER that for 99.9% of civilized human history, women LACKED the same rights as men, it was all for a valid reason, our male ancestors wERe blackpilled about female nature and knew that depriving them of same rights as men was NECESSARY to create an ordERly and functional society (giving them rights on the othER hand, has led to us living in the society we live in today of evER-increasing disharmony and disruption of peace).
Even when men r killing men, if you analyse the background events leading up to it, 99% of the time you will find that a woman was INDIRECTLY responsible for it.
Women lack the physical strength and intelligence to physically defeat men, so they manipulate and emotionally blackmail men into doing all the dirty work for them.
And NO, this ISN’T because women r “master manipulators” or some BS like that, the best strategists and tacticians of psychological warfare have been men: Sun Tszu, Niccholo Machiavelli etc. Women (in genERal) DON’T use intelligence to manipulate men
Women r ONLY able to influence men by using sex/reproduction as a “bargaining chip” to coERce men to do whatevER they want those men to do, and because most men r horny fuckERs, they end up giving in to their biological urges and do whatevER women expect from them in return for being given the ability and opportunity to have sex/reproduce (in the extreme cases TURNING AGAINST their own family and best-friend(s), for women, a powER women ironically only have due to the laws written and enforced by men in the first place).
So, as you can see, their manipulation of men requires NO intelligence whatsoevER, but simply taking advantage of the NATURAL sexual/reproductive resources they are BORN with (their ONLY source of VALUE, and using it to coERce men into doing their bidding in exchange for sex/reproduction).
When a zoo animal breaks free from its cage, you gotta kill it or put it back in its cage othERwise it will cause death and destruction (which is why it was originally in the cage to begin with).
Killing women isn’t an option (we need them for sex/reproduction: not only physical pleasure but for the litERal continuation of the species). So the only logical option remaining, is to put them back in their cages (reduce them to ONLY having the legal right to fulfill their patriarchical traditional AND biologically NATURAL ROLES of child-birthing/raising in addition to othER domestic household duties: cooking/cleaning etc), which involves TAKING AWAY THEIR RIGHTS.
To the normies who have a problem with this, hope you don’t complain when society collapses and you get tortured and/or brutally killed by a horde of angry incels when the inevitable uprising takes place and when your currently comfortable and convenient society becomes a place of chaos and lawlessness.
Enjoy while it lasts, we incels will have the last laugh, and it’s our laugh which will revERberate throughout the pages of history.
