“Omg you incels are literally like socialists! You complain about only a portion of men having sex with most of the women! That’s literally similar to how communists whine about rich people!”
Bullshit. First of all, being rich is rarely accomplished by inheriting a fortune left by “rich” parents. Most people usually become rich through talent, inventions, investments, and other factors which could be controlled or changed.
https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/joshua-rauh-what-forbes-400-list-says-about-american-wealth
On the topic of the sexual market; however, attraction is primarily looks based (both IRL and in dating apps). You can’t really control or change your looks. Surgery could probably only up you a few points (probably 2 PSL) and is very risky.
Since female attraction to males is deviant and skewed (only around 20% of us are physically desirable to them https://medium.com/@worstonlinedate...ably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a), and since attraction is primarily physical with the juggernaut law not applying to women, you will be screwed over as an average or ugly male.
Furthermore, when redpillers/bluepillers criticize that a certain study was visual and that you could display a bit of personality IRL, the phenomenon of the halo effect completely proves that when woman say they want confidence in a man, they usually mean a man who gives off a confidence vibe due to his high tier looks/face.
In addition, when a man is celibate, he is deprived of sex for years. That isn’t the case for poor individuals. They aren’t deprived of money constantly. And even so, support groups exist for them; however, we incels literally have no women lining up for us to give us a taste of the sexual satisfaction that we missed out on.
Bullshit. First of all, being rich is rarely accomplished by inheriting a fortune left by “rich” parents. Most people usually become rich through talent, inventions, investments, and other factors which could be controlled or changed.
https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/joshua-rauh-what-forbes-400-list-says-about-american-wealth
On the topic of the sexual market; however, attraction is primarily looks based (both IRL and in dating apps). You can’t really control or change your looks. Surgery could probably only up you a few points (probably 2 PSL) and is very risky.
Since female attraction to males is deviant and skewed (only around 20% of us are physically desirable to them https://medium.com/@worstonlinedate...ably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a), and since attraction is primarily physical with the juggernaut law not applying to women, you will be screwed over as an average or ugly male.
Furthermore, when redpillers/bluepillers criticize that a certain study was visual and that you could display a bit of personality IRL, the phenomenon of the halo effect completely proves that when woman say they want confidence in a man, they usually mean a man who gives off a confidence vibe due to his high tier looks/face.
In addition, when a man is celibate, he is deprived of sex for years. That isn’t the case for poor individuals. They aren’t deprived of money constantly. And even so, support groups exist for them; however, we incels literally have no women lining up for us to give us a taste of the sexual satisfaction that we missed out on.
Last edited:
