Could you complete the indian army diarrhea headstand challenge?

[Karakol96]

 

[DarkStar]

 

[Abgesang]

How are currys not dying to a plague or something like that

their immune system must be insane.

 

[Roastie Crusher]

How are currys not dying to a plague or something like thatView attachment 1358182 their immune system must be insane.

they were the only people the greeks and mongols couldn't conquer

 

[Paladin]

poojeets

 

[Sloth]

@Third Eye thoughts?

 

[tandoorichickencel]

they were the only people the greeks and mongols couldn't conquer

So much cope.

The original curry inhabitants of the Indus Valley civilisation were all forced to go south and got replaced by the sintasha culture who brought with them Hinduism and Vedic culture. This was over 5000 years ago. Since then a whole heap of different races and ethnicities have raped and pillaged curryland.

“ mongols didn’t invade curryland” - Jfl at this. Do you not know who the mighty Mughals were? They originated in the central Asian steppes and pretty much ruled india for well over a thousand years until proper white Europeans took over 300 years ago.

 

[Roastie Crusher]

So much cope.

The original curry inhabitants of the Indus Valley civilisation were all forced to go south and got replaced by the sintasha culture who brought with them Hinduism and Vedic culture. This was over 5000 years ago. Since then a whole heap of different races and ethnicities have raped and pillaged curryland.

“ mongols didn’t invade curryland” - Jfl at this. Do you not know who the mighty Mughals were? They originated in the central Asian steppes and pretty much ruled india for well over a thousand years until proper white Europeans took over 300 years ago.

where the fuck did i say the mongols didn't invade? This is why you will be replaced by Ai.

No, the Indian subcontinent has never been entirely ruled by a single foreign empire throughout its history. The subcontinent's vast size, diverse geography, and cultural complexity have made it challenging for any single empire—whether foreign or indigenous—to achieve complete and unified control over the entire region. Instead, various empires and dynasties have controlled parts of the subcontinent at different times, often coexisting with other regional powers or independent states.

Historical Context​

The Indian subcontinent, which includes modern-day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, and parts of Afghanistan and Myanmar, has a long history of political fragmentation and regional autonomy. Below are some key points regarding foreign empires and their rule over parts of the subcontinent:

1. Achaemenid Empire (c. 550–330 BCE):
   • The Achaemenid Empire, based in Persia, briefly controlled parts of the northwestern Indian subcontinent (modern-day Pakistan and parts of Afghanistan) during the reign of Darius I (c. 522–486 BCE). However, this control was limited to the Indus Valley region and did not extend to the entire subcontinent.
2. Seleucid Empire (c. 312–63 BCE):
   • After Alexander the Great's death, the Seleucid Empire, one of his successor states, initially controlled parts of the northwestern Indian subcontinent. However, this control was short-lived, as the Mauryan Empire under Chandragupta Maurya defeated the Seleucids in the early 3rd century BCE and took over these territories.
3. Kushans (1st–3rd centuries CE):
   • The Kushan Empire, a Central Asian dynasty, controlled significant parts of northern India and Pakistan, as well as parts of Central Asia. While they were a foreign power, their rule was not over the entire subcontinent, and they coexisted with other regional powers in southern and eastern India.
4. Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526):
   • The Delhi Sultanate, established by Turkic and Afghan invaders, controlled large parts of northern India and parts of the Deccan Plateau. However, their rule was never absolute, and southern India remained largely independent under various Hindu and regional kingdoms, such as the Vijayanagara Empire and the Bahmani Sultanate.
5. Mughal Empire (1526–1857):
   • The Mughal Empire, founded by Babur, a Central Asian ruler, is often cited as one of the most extensive foreign empires to rule parts of India. At its peak under Emperor Aurangzeb (r. 1658–1707), the Mughals controlled much of northern, central, and parts of southern India. However, even at its height, the Mughal Empire did not control the entire subcontinent. For example:
     • The southern regions, such as the kingdoms of Mysore and Travancore, remained independent.
     • The Maratha Empire in western and central India was a significant rival to Mughal power.
     • The northeastern regions, including modern-day Assam and Bengal, were often under the control of local powers like the Ahom Kingdom.
6. British Raj (1858–1947):
   • The British colonial rule, known as the British Raj, came closest to controlling the entire Indian subcontinent. After the Indian Rebellion of 1857, the British Crown took direct control of India from the East India Company. By the early 20th century, the British had established control over most of the subcontinent, including modern-day India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. However, even during British rule:
     • Princely states, such as Hyderabad, Mysore, and Kashmir, retained a degree of autonomy under British suzerainty.
     • The northeastern regions, like Manipur and Sikkim, were not fully integrated into British India until later.

Conclusion​

While foreign powers like the Mughals and the British controlled significant portions of the Indian subcontinent at various times, no single foreign empire has ever ruled the entire subcontinent in its entirety. The region's diversity and the presence of multiple regional powers have historically prevented the establishment of a unified, foreign-controlled empire over all of India.

 

[iicc66]

How are currys not dying to a plague or something like thatView attachment 1358182 their immune system must be insane.

Saw reddit posts of normal people travelling to india and getting sick asf instantly, their immune systems are probably tough asf from all the cow shit they eat since a very young age, or whatever they eat idk

 

[tandoorichickencel]

where the fuck did i say the mongols didn't invade? This is why you will be replaced by Ai.

No, the Indian subcontinent has never been entirely ruled by a single foreign empire throughout its history. The subcontinent's vast size, diverse geography, and cultural complexity have made it challenging for any single empire—whether foreign or indigenous—to achieve complete and unified control over the entire region. Instead, various empires and dynasties have controlled parts of the subcontinent at different times, often coexisting with other regional powers or independent states.

Historical Context​

The Indian subcontinent, which includes modern-day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, and parts of Afghanistan and Myanmar, has a long history of political fragmentation and regional autonomy. Below are some key points regarding foreign empires and their rule over parts of the subcontinent:

1. Achaemenid Empire (c. 550–330 BCE):
   • The Achaemenid Empire, based in Persia, briefly controlled parts of the northwestern Indian subcontinent (modern-day Pakistan and parts of Afghanistan) during the reign of Darius I (c. 522–486 BCE). However, this control was limited to the Indus Valley region and did not extend to the entire subcontinent.
2. Seleucid Empire (c. 312–63 BCE):
   • After Alexander the Great's death, the Seleucid Empire, one of his successor states, initially controlled parts of the northwestern Indian subcontinent. However, this control was short-lived, as the Mauryan Empire under Chandragupta Maurya defeated the Seleucids in the early 3rd century BCE and took over these territories.
3. Kushans (1st–3rd centuries CE):
   • The Kushan Empire, a Central Asian dynasty, controlled significant parts of northern India and Pakistan, as well as parts of Central Asia. While they were a foreign power, their rule was not over the entire subcontinent, and they coexisted with other regional powers in southern and eastern India.
4. Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526):
   • The Delhi Sultanate, established by Turkic and Afghan invaders, controlled large parts of northern India and parts of the Deccan Plateau. However, their rule was never absolute, and southern India remained largely independent under various Hindu and regional kingdoms, such as the Vijayanagara Empire and the Bahmani Sultanate.
5. Mughal Empire (1526–1857):
   • The Mughal Empire, founded by Babur, a Central Asian ruler, is often cited as one of the most extensive foreign empires to rule parts of India. At its peak under Emperor Aurangzeb (r. 1658–1707), the Mughals controlled much of northern, central, and parts of southern India. However, even at its height, the Mughal Empire did not control the entire subcontinent. For example:
     • The southern regions, such as the kingdoms of Mysore and Travancore, remained independent.
     • The Maratha Empire in western and central India was a significant rival to Mughal power.
     • The northeastern regions, including modern-day Assam and Bengal, were often under the control of local powers like the Ahom Kingdom.
6. British Raj (1858–1947):
   • The British colonial rule, known as the British Raj, came closest to controlling the entire Indian subcontinent. After the Indian Rebellion of 1857, the British Crown took direct control of India from the East India Company. By the early 20th century, the British had established control over most of the subcontinent, including modern-day India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. However, even during British rule:
     • Princely states, such as Hyderabad, Mysore, and Kashmir, retained a degree of autonomy under British suzerainty.
     • The northeastern regions, like Manipur and Sikkim, were not fully integrated into British India until later.

Conclusion​

While foreign powers like the Mughals and the British controlled significant portions of the Indian subcontinent at various times, no single foreign empire has ever ruled the entire subcontinent in its entirety. The region's diversity and the presence of multiple regional powers have historically prevented the establishment of a unified, foreign-controlled empire over all of India.

Ok ChatGPT cel

 

[Adolf Kitler]

where the fuck did i say the mongols didn't invade? This is why you will be replaced by Ai.

No, the Indian subcontinent has never been entirely ruled by a single foreign empire throughout its history. The subcontinent's vast size, diverse geography, and cultural complexity have made it challenging for any single empire—whether foreign or indigenous—to achieve complete and unified control over the entire region. Instead, various empires and dynasties have controlled parts of the subcontinent at different times, often coexisting with other regional powers or independent states.

Historical Context​

The Indian subcontinent, which includes modern-day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, and parts of Afghanistan and Myanmar, has a long history of political fragmentation and regional autonomy. Below are some key points regarding foreign empires and their rule over parts of the subcontinent:

1. Achaemenid Empire (c. 550–330 BCE):
   • The Achaemenid Empire, based in Persia, briefly controlled parts of the northwestern Indian subcontinent (modern-day Pakistan and parts of Afghanistan) during the reign of Darius I (c. 522–486 BCE). However, this control was limited to the Indus Valley region and did not extend to the entire subcontinent.
2. Seleucid Empire (c. 312–63 BCE):
   • After Alexander the Great's death, the Seleucid Empire, one of his successor states, initially controlled parts of the northwestern Indian subcontinent. However, this control was short-lived, as the Mauryan Empire under Chandragupta Maurya defeated the Seleucids in the early 3rd century BCE and took over these territories.
3. Kushans (1st–3rd centuries CE):
   • The Kushan Empire, a Central Asian dynasty, controlled significant parts of northern India and Pakistan, as well as parts of Central Asia. While they were a foreign power, their rule was not over the entire subcontinent, and they coexisted with other regional powers in southern and eastern India.
4. Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526):
   • The Delhi Sultanate, established by Turkic and Afghan invaders, controlled large parts of northern India and parts of the Deccan Plateau. However, their rule was never absolute, and southern India remained largely independent under various Hindu and regional kingdoms, such as the Vijayanagara Empire and the Bahmani Sultanate.
5. Mughal Empire (1526–1857):
   • The Mughal Empire, founded by Babur, a Central Asian ruler, is often cited as one of the most extensive foreign empires to rule parts of India. At its peak under Emperor Aurangzeb (r. 1658–1707), the Mughals controlled much of northern, central, and parts of southern India. However, even at its height, the Mughal Empire did not control the entire subcontinent. For example:
     • The southern regions, such as the kingdoms of Mysore and Travancore, remained independent.
     • The Maratha Empire in western and central India was a significant rival to Mughal power.
     • The northeastern regions, including modern-day Assam and Bengal, were often under the control of local powers like the Ahom Kingdom.
6. British Raj (1858–1947):
   • The British colonial rule, known as the British Raj, came closest to controlling the entire Indian subcontinent. After the Indian Rebellion of 1857, the British Crown took direct control of India from the East India Company. By the early 20th century, the British had established control over most of the subcontinent, including modern-day India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. However, even during British rule:
     • Princely states, such as Hyderabad, Mysore, and Kashmir, retained a degree of autonomy under British suzerainty.
     • The northeastern regions, like Manipur and Sikkim, were not fully integrated into British India until later.

Conclusion​

While foreign powers like the Mughals and the British controlled significant portions of the Indian subcontinent at various times, no single foreign empire has ever ruled the entire subcontinent in its entirety. The region's diversity and the presence of multiple regional powers have historically prevented the establishment of a unified, foreign-controlled empire over all of India.

 

[Roastie Crusher]

View attachment 1358213

 

[Adolf Kitler]

View attachment 1358222

I saw the king von version of this

 

[Hatred]

poojeets

Self-hate

 

[Karakol96]

How are currys not dying to a plague or something like thatView attachment 1358182 their immune system must be insane.

Because they havent been injected with it