CONCEPT OF LOOKSMATCH SHOULD BE ABOLISHED. LOOKS SHOULDN'T BE THE ONLY ASPECT USED TO DETERMINE WHETHER 2 PEOPLE SHOULD BE DATING.

[IncelKing]

We (incels) are just normal human beings who happen to be unattractive/ugly due to factors out of our control, which we can compensate for with intelligence and hard work in order to achieve money/status. Just because we're bad-looking doesnt mean we deserve equally bad-looking females. In the area of dating, individuals should date someone who is of equal TOTAL VALUE derived from Looks, Money, Status; not just Looks.

For example an incel with income 1 standard-deviation above the average deserves a female of same appearance as a normie with median income or a chad with income 1 standard-deviation below average, assuming the variable of status is constant for each scenario and cannot be influenced by looks or money.

Using the same example for Status and assuming "Status" is a measurable concept, an incel with status 1 standard-deviation above the average deserves female of same appearance as normie with median status and chad with status 1 standard-deviation below average, assuming the variable of money is constant (they have same income.)

Society (in the field of dating) unfortunately operates just based on appearances alone without taking into consideration money and status. Society wants ugly males to date ugly females, no matter how much money or status the ugly male has as they just cant tolerate genetically weak males succeeding in life. But why should we follow these social rules set in place by society when it has no authority to create these rules nor the ability to enforce them. We are not obliged to follow these social rules and have the freedom to go against such rules, especially considering that not only do they not benefit us, but they are also illogical and based on false-reasoning

Honestly tired of low IQcels who tell incels to seek women significantly below their looksmatch (If thats even possible for some of us). By telling incels to "settle" for equally unattractive females, you're encouraging them to accept trash/leftovers just because society believes that's what we deserve as a result of deeming us to be at the bottom of the barrel (Which we are not), but using only looks as their criteria for perceiving us as inferior.

 

[Deleted member 17883]

We take what we can get. Like scavengers and vultures. Except we're way less cool if you ask me. (actually, we're as ugly as vultures too, compared to other birds).

 

[HumanTrash]

Thought this was another GoT-spoiler thread tbhtbh

 

[EyesAreSoCold]

We (incels) are just normal human beings who happen to be unattractive/ugly due to factors out of our control, which we can compensate for with intelligence and hard work in order to achieve money/status. Just because we're bad-looking doesnt mean we deserve equally bad-looking females. We deserve a female partner whose appearance corresponds to our TOTAL VALUE in Looks, Money, Status; not just Looks.

For example an incel with income 1 standard-deviation above the average deserves a female of same appearance as a normie with median income or a chad with income 1 standard-deviation below average, assuming the variable of status is constant for each scenario and cannot be influenced by looks or money.

Using the same example for Status and assuming "Status" is a measurable concept, an incel with status 1 standard-deviation above the average deserves female of same appearance as normie with median status and chad with status 1 standard-deviation below average, assuming the variable of money is constant (they have same income.)

Society (in the field of dating) unfortunately operates just based on appearances alone without taking into consideration money and status. Society wants ugly males to date ugly females, no matter how much money or status the ugly male has as they just cant tolerate genetically weak males succeeding in life. But why should we follow these social rules set in place by society when it has no authority to create these rules nor the ability to enforce them. We are not obliged to follow these social rules and have the freedom to go against such rules, especially considering that not only do they not benefit us, but they are also illogical and based on false-reasoning

Honestly tired of low IQcels who tell incels to seek women significantly below their looksmatch (If thats even possible for some of us). By telling incels to "settle" for equally unattractive females, you're encouraging them to accept trash/leftovers just because society believes that's what we deserve as a result of deeming us to be at the bottom of the barrel (Which we are not), but using only looks as their criteria for perceiving us as inferior.

The problem with this is that there isn't enough women in the world, if you go for someone higher some other guy would have to settle for less.

But otherwise I agree that it's not good to only compare looks between men and women to determine if they match because men provide so much more. And even worse is those guys who would willingly be with an uglier foid thus enabling hypergamy.

 

[IncelKing]

The problem with this is that there isn't enough women in the world, if you go for someone higher some other guy would have to settle for less.

But otherwise I agree that it's not good to only compare looks between men and women to determine if they match because men provide so much more.

When you're talking about going for someone "higher" you're again thinking in terms of only looks. Im saying, people should go for someone who is equal to them in Looks, Money, Status after taking into consideration all factors. I already gave the example in the post, but i guess i'll have to repeat myself. Person A (male or female) can go for person B who is better looking, as long as person A has more money and/or status than person B to the extent that person A and person B are equal in terms of their COMBINED Looks, Money and Status (LMS).

If we're using LMS to determine whether 2 people should date or not, then if Person A dates his LMS match- person B, how does it prevent some other guy from settling for his LMS match. Sure, the other guy who is better looking than person A lost his looksmatch but he can get his LMS match in numerous other ways. Point is, everyone can find someone of equal LMS value in this system, and very few to none will miss out. Here are the various combinations of Looks, Money and Status which can result in 2 people being of the same LMS value.

• Person A and B are equal in looks, equal in money and equal in status (individually)
• Person A has more money. Person B has more status. They're equal in looks
• Person A has more money. Person B has more looks. They're equal in status.
• Person A has more looks. Person B has more status. They're equal in money.
• Person A has more looks. Person B has more money. They're equal in status.
• Person A has more status. Person B has more money. They're equal in looks
• Person A has more status. Person B has more looks. They're equal in money.
• Person A has more money and status. Person B has more looks
• Person A has more money and looks. Person B has more status
• Person A has more status and looks. Person B has more money

^^ The above is same for Person B ^^

Each person compensates for having less value than the other person in an aspect or 2, by having EQUALLY more value in the other 2 aspects or aspect, resulting in overall equal LMS value.

So even if someone's looksmatch is taken, there are many other ways to obtain someone of same LMS value. The whole point of this post is that people should find a partner of same LMS value rather than looking for a looksmatch. Please learn to read my post carefully next time so you understand it.

 

[Napoleon de Nascar]

My real looksmatch is cute loli becky, as I am gentleman of culture with refined taste

 

[EyesAreSoCold]

When you're talking about going for someone "higher" you're again thinking in terms of only looks. Im saying, people should go for someone who is equal to them in Looks, Money, Status after taking into consideration all factors. I already gave the example in the post, but i guess i'll have to repeat myself. Person A (male or female) can go for person B who is better looking, as long as person A has more money and/or status than person B to the extent that person A and person B are equal in terms of their COMBINED Looks, Money and Status (LMS).

If we're using LMS to determine whether 2 people should date or not, then if Person A dates his LMS match- person B, how does it prevent some other guy from settling for his LMS match. Sure, the other guy who is better looking than person A lost his looksmatch but he can get his LMS match in numerous other ways. Point is, everyone can find someone of equal LMS value in this system, and very few to none will miss out. Here are the various combinations of Looks, Money and Status which can result in 2 people being of the same LMS value.

• Person A and B are equal in looks, equal in money and equal in status (individually)
• Person A has more money. Person B has more status. They're equal in looks
• Person A has more money. Person B has more looks. They're equal in status.
• Person A has more looks. Person B has more status. They're equal in money.
• Person A has more looks. Person B has more money. They're equal in status.
• Person A has more status. Person B has more money. They're equal in looks
• Person A has more status. Person B has more looks. They're equal in money.
• Person A has more money and status. Person B has more looks
• Person A has more money and looks. Person B has more status
• Person A has more status and looks. Person B has more money

^^ The above is same for Person B ^^

Each person compensates for having less value than the other person in an aspect or 2, by having EQUALLY more value in the other 2 aspects or aspect, resulting in same LMS value.

So even if someone's looksmatch is taken, there are many other ways to obtain someone of same LMS value. The whole point of this post is that people should find a partner of same LMS value rather than looking for a looksmatch. Please learn to read my post carefully next time so you understand it.

Money or status doesn't really matter to men, women are entirely dependent on their looks, there is no way a man is going to prefer an uglier foid because she has more money or status. But if you're talking about how men could compete with each other for women then sure money and status should matter and it already does. But looks is still the most important thing for both genders and that is why matching in looks is the simplest because money and status doesn't really matter much, or for women it's still a lot tbh they can't live without money from males so then you're right.

 

[FinnCel]

High IQ

This will promote working hard and improving yourself in every conceivable way

 

[IncelKing]

Money or status doesn't really matter to men, women are entirely dependent on their looks, there is no way a man is going to prefer an uglier foid because she has more money or status. But if you're talking about how men could compete with each other for women then sure money and status should matter and it already does. But looks is still the most important thing for both genders and that is why matching in looks is the simplest because money and status doesn't really matter much, or for women it's still a lot tbh they can't live without money from males so then you're right.

I know this is realistically not the case in today's world. But if it WAS the case, things would be bettER. This is just my proposal of how the world SHOULD be. Not the way it actually is.