Yes, you read that right, circumcision is objective worse than (male-on-female) rape. Does that sound insane, wrong and triggering to you? Well, that may be due to your internalized misandry. But don't worry. Today, I will carefully explain why circumcision (or male genital mutilation, which is a more appropriate term) is worse than rape.
Basically, circumcision of helpless baby boys is equivalent to sexual assault and permanent wounding with a deadly weapon.
Also, children naturally born with their parents, all kids therefore natural Stockholm Syndrome victims. Many victims of male genital mutilation are completely unable to comprehend or articulate the abuse and betrayal done to them.
So it is a double whammy, the victim can't get legal address, but many times they can't even understand that they have been abused.
Male victims get gaslighted by society and are told they are not victims, when they have been abused and tortured in the most vile manner. They were strapped down as a hopeless toddler, and had the most sensitive part of their body removed without anesthetic. The male victim was not only tortured, but was unnecessarily put at the risk of death.
If this was happening to females, such practice would have been considered an outrage. Women would be marching on the street and protesting. While knight men would attack and beat up doctors who performed female circumcision. Even helpless baby boys are considered disposable subhumans.
If you have a foreskin, feel it and think to yourself: "I only have this part of my body because my parents allowed it". Society did not granted boys the protection from genital mutilation that it grant girls.
People bragging about raping kids or women would most likely hunted down by a mob, if they didn't end up in jail first. Circumcision is a legitimate legal practice in the eyes of society, while rape is illegal.
1. Circumcision causes more harm than rape:
Rape can only be comparable circumcision if the rapist also mutilates the victim's sexual organs. Since rapists do not usually do such, the vast majority of rapes are not as harmful as the mutilation of the penis of a helpless infant.Basically, circumcision of helpless baby boys is equivalent to sexual assault and permanent wounding with a deadly weapon.
2. The power differential of the victims:
Baby boys are completely helpless, they cannot even speak for themselves. The average (female) victim of rape has a much better chance of fighting back against their attacker than a completely helpless newborn. The criminal justice system takes into account the vulnerability of the victim. The more powerless the victim is, the more of a graded the offense. The average rape victim is able to try and seek justice and get the perpetrator of the crime punished, helpless newborn can't.Also, children naturally born with their parents, all kids therefore natural Stockholm Syndrome victims. Many victims of male genital mutilation are completely unable to comprehend or articulate the abuse and betrayal done to them.
So it is a double whammy, the victim can't get legal address, but many times they can't even understand that they have been abused.
3. The existence of misandry:
Men live in an anti-male misandric society where men are shown less compassion than women. That mean on top of being unable to get justice, male victims are less likely to get support or help to deal with the trauma of genital mutilation.Male victims get gaslighted by society and are told they are not victims, when they have been abused and tortured in the most vile manner. They were strapped down as a hopeless toddler, and had the most sensitive part of their body removed without anesthetic. The male victim was not only tortured, but was unnecessarily put at the risk of death.
If this was happening to females, such practice would have been considered an outrage. Women would be marching on the street and protesting. While knight men would attack and beat up doctors who performed female circumcision. Even helpless baby boys are considered disposable subhumans.
If you have a foreskin, feel it and think to yourself: "I only have this part of my body because my parents allowed it". Society did not granted boys the protection from genital mutilation that it grant girls.
4. The institutional nature of circumcision, compared to illegal status of the rape act:
Quite simply, unlike baby dick mutilation, rape is not promoted or performed by any any state-run institutions. Rapists of women are considered subhumans scum of the Earth. On the other hand, baby dick cutting only gets a mere shrunk for many people. You even have people on mainstream social media praising circumcision, bragging about having it done to their kids or threatening to do it to any kid they have.People bragging about raping kids or women would most likely hunted down by a mob, if they didn't end up in jail first. Circumcision is a legitimate legal practice in the eyes of society, while rape is illegal.
