ResidentHell
Veteran
★
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2022
- Posts
- 1,091
Slave morality favors the poor and condemns the rich, with doctrines along the lines of "the meek shall inherit the earth", "the wealthy shall die and not enter heaven", "give to the poor and the sick", "do not envy the rich for they will suffer and shall be punished"
The issue with slave morality is that it caters to all demographics who are considered "oppressed". This includes women, ethnic minorities and LGBTQUIA. In the long run, it causes damage to the infrastructure of advanced societies like in East Asia and the West, because it allows intellectually inferior people and radical people with ulterior agendas to infiltrate other societies and cause social instability from the inside out
The enforcement of welfare state, relaxed stances on immigration, affirmative action, are all examples of how "slave morality" can have corrosive effects on the infrastructure of advanced societies. But when "slave morality" is exercised without restriction, it can easily lead to ochlocracy, cause like I said, people with ulterior agendas or ulterior interests can infiltrate a society and rise to power from the inside. "Slave morality" would ultimately be in their favor, as they would initially be seen as a marginalized or oppressed group for whatever reason (e.g. they are female, or homosexual, transgender, or ethnic migrant)
You have already seen recent examples of neo-ochlocratic activities, like:
All of this can be credited to the effects of "slave morality", and it will only be intensified in the future. Christianity is very aligned with "slave morality". Most of the "virtues" taught in Christian dogma can be dumbed down to slave morality. Eventually slave morality becomes the undoing of societies because it motivates people to allow privileges to other people who might have agendas or interests that would prove to be detrimental to the infrastructure of advanced societies over the long term. If a weak person is granted power, can the weak person be trusted not to resort to corruption or tyranny once they are in a position of power or influence?
It's like with normies, they come from all walks of life, weak and strong, rich and poor, high IQ and low IQ. The homeless man who begs for money on the street, he could be the kind of person who if given enough power, would turn around and start to abuse or condescend on people who he perceives as socially or financially inferior to him. It doesn't matter who is rich or poor, some people may have innate desires to be cruel or insensitive to others, regardless of how rich or poor they are. If the poor are given the conditions and abilities to exercise their desires, the poor man could ultimately become the tyrant, just like the man who already has power
The issue with slave morality is that it caters to all demographics who are considered "oppressed". This includes women, ethnic minorities and LGBTQUIA. In the long run, it causes damage to the infrastructure of advanced societies like in East Asia and the West, because it allows intellectually inferior people and radical people with ulterior agendas to infiltrate other societies and cause social instability from the inside out
The enforcement of welfare state, relaxed stances on immigration, affirmative action, are all examples of how "slave morality" can have corrosive effects on the infrastructure of advanced societies. But when "slave morality" is exercised without restriction, it can easily lead to ochlocracy, cause like I said, people with ulterior agendas or ulterior interests can infiltrate a society and rise to power from the inside. "Slave morality" would ultimately be in their favor, as they would initially be seen as a marginalized or oppressed group for whatever reason (e.g. they are female, or homosexual, transgender, or ethnic migrant)
You have already seen recent examples of neo-ochlocratic activities, like:
Black Lives Matter movement, a neo-Marxist movement which resulted in the destruction of several shops and businesses, including family-run businesses, as well as the misappropriation of millions of $$$ of BLM funds to the personal pockets of BLM leaders and other LGBT organizations
The #MeToo and AWDTSG movements, which mostly targets men, including some who are falsely accused of sexual harassment or false accusations of having sexual relations with other women
"Cancel culture" in mainstream media and companies. Anyone who's alleged to have expressed views that are interpreted as anti-Semitic, transphobic, homophobic, racist or misogynistic, they will nuke their social media accounts, financial accounts or / and fire them from their job
Pride / LGBT movement, which goes as far as to grooming kids & toddlers into becoming faggots or troons via kindergarten / elementary school curriculum, kids TV shows, video games
All of this can be credited to the effects of "slave morality", and it will only be intensified in the future. Christianity is very aligned with "slave morality". Most of the "virtues" taught in Christian dogma can be dumbed down to slave morality. Eventually slave morality becomes the undoing of societies because it motivates people to allow privileges to other people who might have agendas or interests that would prove to be detrimental to the infrastructure of advanced societies over the long term. If a weak person is granted power, can the weak person be trusted not to resort to corruption or tyranny once they are in a position of power or influence?
It's like with normies, they come from all walks of life, weak and strong, rich and poor, high IQ and low IQ. The homeless man who begs for money on the street, he could be the kind of person who if given enough power, would turn around and start to abuse or condescend on people who he perceives as socially or financially inferior to him. It doesn't matter who is rich or poor, some people may have innate desires to be cruel or insensitive to others, regardless of how rich or poor they are. If the poor are given the conditions and abilities to exercise their desires, the poor man could ultimately become the tyrant, just like the man who already has power
Last edited: