China is a well policed state

[sexualeconomist]

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/jJ2sJooIjus?si=E3L-9rbnwuZVMwtp



The police is so ruthless and law so brutal that it doesn't required to be used nor do people even notice it

plus lots of cams and surveillance systems. Tracking u
No homeless no beggers no street ugly stray dogs and cows
No crowding no feces and needles no tents cities as cities should be


Didn't stop them from having a great time tho

 

[Horatio Alger]

Xinjiang Autonomous Region is the ideal police state

the rest of China is basically just like any Western country except with slightly less political freedom

 

[Scatius Deletus]

GLORY TO THE CCP!!!!

 

[DarkStar]

China is a “role model” for many countries, according to World Economic Forum (WEF) boss Klaus Schwab, in a recent interview with Chinese state media. “I think we should be very careful in imposing systems,” Schwab added, “but the Chinese model is certainly a very attractive model for quite a number of countries.”

Klaus Schwab Proclaims China a “Role Model” for Many Nations | K. Lloyd Billingsley

China is a “role model” for many countries, according to World Economic Forum (WEF) boss Klaus Schwab, in a recent interview with Chinese state media. “I think we should be very careful in imposing systems,” Schwab added, “but the Chinese model is certainly a very attractive model for quite a...

blog.independent.org

Average "multipolar world" enjoyer.

@wereq
@Regenerator
@Chudpreet
@Castaway
@WorthlessSlavicShit

 

[chudjak]

Fuck the police

 

[sexualeconomist]

Xinjiang Autonomous Region is the ideal police state

the rest of China is basically just like any Western country except with slightly less political freedom

No western cities are far more filthy dirty full of homeless criminals dogs
And other pests haven'tu heard of knife crime in London
Or car burning ritual of Paris

Western political freedom are not worth the ballot paper they are printed on its just a vanity you are just creating more fractions

 

[sexualeconomist]

Klaus Schwab Proclaims China a “Role Model” for Many Nations | K. Lloyd Billingsley

China is a “role model” for many countries, according to World Economic Forum (WEF) boss Klaus Schwab, in a recent interview with Chinese state media. “I think we should be very careful in imposing systems,” Schwab added, “but the Chinese model is certainly a very attractive model for quite a...

blog.independent.org

Average "multipolar world" enjoyer.

@wereq
@Regenerator
@Chudpreet
@Castaway
@WorthlessSlavicShit

Nothing wrong about what he said

 

[Horatio Alger]

No western cities are far more filthy dirty full of homeless criminals dogs
And other pests haven'tu heard of knife crime in London
Or car burning ritual of Paris

Western political freedom are not worth the ballot paper they are printed on its just a vanity you are just creating more fractions

Acts of terrorism also occur in China

that's why China established a digital police in Xinjiang against Uyghurs and even against Han Chinese in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. the rest of China is just moderately authoritarian

Too much political freedom exists in the West

 

[Anthrofurrcel]

Nothing wrong about what he said

 

[Fire]

No homeless no beggers no street ugly stray dogs and cows
No crowding no feces and needles no tents cities as cities should be

You don't need a surveillance state to solve these issues.

 

[DarkStar]

You don't need a surveillance state to solve these issues.

If you set-up the nation-state correctly to start with, you would hardly need surveillance

 

[Hail The Bloatlord]

GLORY TO THE CCP!!!!

 

[Regenerator]

Klaus Schwab Proclaims China a “Role Model” for Many Nations | K. Lloyd Billingsley

China is a “role model” for many countries, according to World Economic Forum (WEF) boss Klaus Schwab, in a recent interview with Chinese state media. “I think we should be very careful in imposing systems,” Schwab added, “but the Chinese model is certainly a very attractive model for quite a...

blog.independent.org

Average "multipolar world" enjoyer.

@wereq
@Regenerator
@Chudpreet
@Castaway
@WorthlessSlavicShit

BRICStards being retarded.

 

[DarkStar]

BRICStards being retarded.

I see China just as the way Trump is more or less

Not really ideal even, and ofc not "good" by any metric at all. Simply, it just makes sense to have no single "global power" leading the world. Which yes that's what they "claim" to want but it's obvious that as per human nature, they want global dominance.

I concede, it might be less degenerate than the West. However, it will still be hypergamous and dystopian.

@To koniec @Biowaste Removal I think we talked about this recently.

 

[To koniec]

I see China just as the way Trump is more or less

Not really ideal even, and ofc not "good" by any metric at all. Simply, it just makes sense to have no single "global power" leading the world. Which yes that's what they "claim" to want but it's obvious that as per human nature, they want global dominance.

I concede, it might be less degenerate than the West. However, it will still be hypergamous and dystopian.

@To koniec @Biowaste Removal I think we talked about this recently.

Yeah China is not worst of worst really, but still i'm not biggest fan of them

 

[Regenerator]

I see China just as the way Trump is more or less

Not really ideal even, and ofc not "good" by any metric at all. Simply, it just makes sense to have no single "global power" leading the world. Which yes that's what they "claim" to want but it's obvious that as per human nature, they want global dominance.

I concede, it might be less degenerate than the West. However, it will still be hypergamous and dystopian.

@To koniec @Biowaste Removal I think we talked about this recently.

 

[DarkStar]

Yeah China is not worst of worst really, but still i'm not biggest fan of them

Like I said, look what Mr. Schwab, head of the literal WEF said.

Now imagine that implemented alongside the gynocentrism in the rest of the world.

In that case, we might as well kiss this community adios.

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

I see China just as the way Trump is more or less

Not really ideal even, and ofc not "good" by any metric at all. Simply, it just makes sense to have no single "global power" leading the world. Which yes that's what they "claim" to want but it's obvious that as per human nature, they want global dominance.

Exactly. It's just better to have multiple options more or less balancing each other out, rather than a single unstoppable power (which the US and its allies were until just recently to a level that I think most people don't really grasp, I've thought about making a thread about this recently.)

 

[Emba]

Fuck the police

Ok

 

[Cryotron]

rest of China is basically just like any Western country except with slightly less political freedom

 

[andinocel]

No homeless no beggers

That's enough to make it nice. I fucking hate beggars - most I've come across are aggressive and entitled.

 

[Horatio Alger]

I might make a post explaining how the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region marries the best of both worlds: maintaining a Totalitarian Police State and a robust private sector that contributed to sustained economic growth alongside innovation in bio and digital surveillance

The rest of China outside said province is just the West but with redundant censorship

 

[Cryotron]

I might make a post explaining how the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region marries the best of both worlds: maintaining a Totalitarian Police State and a robust private sector that contributed to robust economic growth alongside innovation in bio and digital surveillance

they monitor and surveil these animals for a reason, but i don't believe that China is just slightly less free than the West.

 

[Horatio Alger]

they monitor and surveil these animals for a reason, but i don't believe that China is just slightly less free than the West.

It's basically the West,

The only authoritarian countries on the planet is North Korea and MAYBE Afghanistan

 

[Horatio Alger]

It's basically the West,

The only authoritarian countries on the planet is North Korea and MAYBE Afghanistan

Actually,not even the Taliban, they are pretty soft handed towards the populace

So North Korea is the only authoritarian country in the planet

 

[DarkStar]

Exactly. It's just better to have multiple options more or less balancing each other out, rather than a single unstoppable power

Basically everyone outweighs one another.

(which the US and its allies were until just recently to a level that I think most people don't really grasp,

Nah, we do. It's very obvious

The Cold War had the USSR as a counterweight, and beforehand it was more split since the UK was much stronger as was France who acted separately. though ofc, we both agree the USSR was just as bad if not worse than the US. In fact, I could explain how both were controlled by the same people more or less.

After WWI, most countries effectively became a form of "controlled" opposition due to various factors. And the last real opposition to globohomo ended in 45'

In fact, I think it would have been good for an "Anglo+French & American" split of sorts so that the UK & France won't be as intertwined to the US. Because let's face it, they're basically puppet states that just have a bit more leverage than smaller ones such as let's say Portugal.

I've thought about making a thread about this recently.)

Eh, geopolitics whilst important is something I find not as interesting.

I focus more on stuff such as immigration & economics which are more important imo & relevant. I constantly get irked by both FOX & CNN obsession over Gaza+Ukraine whilst the border is wide open, we have over 10 million illegals here, tons of economic issues, and not even healthcare. To me, constant obsession over geopolitics just reeks of the classic Upper-class Neoliberals who are using it as distraction, or have their balls tied to overseas banking/investments.

I also dislike how many online, even here, claim that this "benefits" the average population of these countries & use it to justify stuff against the population as a whole; including a certain someone who will be back. In reality, it doesn't benefit us since we pay for it ultimately, and only the richfags benefit.

I can also guarantee the thread will be full of BRICS dick-suckers who can't understand nuance in just wanting what we talked about, which still means the US & allies have power, and them shilling for it to the point they are contradicting their initial argument.

 

[starcrapoo]

Meanwhile in America, I have to worry about dying every single day. No fuckin joke either.

Niggers and spics drive very aggressively. They're just plain stupid and dangerous.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDjvMGUBHto

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

Nah, we do. It's very obvious

Yeah, but currently it's nowhere near where it was in the period I mentioned. It's basically the difference between being the biggest cog in a machine, which the US + its allies currently are, versus being the entire machine itself, which the West was during the Unipolar Moment. There legit was basically no chance of anyone competing with the US, and to a lesser extent with its allies, in any sphere from economic to cultural, and there was no serious concentration of wealth or high-tech manufacturing anywhere in the rest of the world. Now, large swaths of Eurasia are more or less modern, global inequality, when adjusted for population, has flipped from the highest to the lowest in centuries, and even psychologically/culturally people seem to be recovering from the gigamog of that era (local songs/singers are becoming more popular in Europe and Japan while the popularity of US films is slowly falling in other countries/regions.)

The Cold War had the USSR as a counterweight, and beforehand it was more split since the UK was much stronger as was France who acted separately. though ofc, we both agree the USSR was just as bad if not worse than the US. In fact, I could explain how both were controlled by the same people more or less.

Yup. Then there was absolutely nothing for a while after the USSR collapsed, and only recently has the balance of power started to return.

In fact, I think it would have been good for an "Anglo+French & American" split of sorts so that the UK & France won't be as intertwined to the US. Because let's face it, they're basically puppet states that just have a bit more leverage than smaller ones such as let's say Portugal.

Dunno, even if that happened it's not like they are anywhere near as strong as they once were.

Eh, geopolitics whilst important is something I find not as interesting.

I focus more on stuff such as immigration & economics which are more important imo & relevant.

I mean, geopolitics is pretty relevant in the areas where the main events are currently going on.

 

[RechargedSamsung]

I got banned of rednote after making a winneh the pooh Chinese meme

 

[DarkStar]

Yeah, but currently it's nowhere near where it was in the period I mentioned. It's basically the difference between being the biggest cog in a machine, which the US + its allies currently are, versus being the entire machine itself, which the West was during the Unipolar Moment. There legit was basically no chance of anyone competing with the US, and to a lesser extent with its allies, in any sphere from economic to cultural, and there was no serious concentration of wealth or high-tech manufacturing anywhere in the rest of the world. Now, large swaths of Eurasia are more or less modern, global inequality, when adjusted for population, has flipped from the highest to the lowest in centuries, and even psychologically/culturally people seem to be recovering from the gigamog of that era (local songs/singers are becoming more popular in Europe and Japan while the popularity of US films is slowly falling in other countries/regions.)

Good at least, I hate how Americanized the world is

Yup. Then there was absolutely nothing for a while after the USSR collapsed, and only recently has the balance of power started to return.

Makes sense.

Dunno, even if that happened it's not like they are anywhere near as strong as they once were.

But you see the point. Yes, the Anglo+French alliance weren't that powerful after the war, but they did still have more power & leverage back then.

The Sino-Soviet split was good imo, and that would have also been good as well since Britain+France would have dominated Europe & parts of Africa still.

I mean, geopolitics is pretty relevant in the areas where the main events are currently going on.

Well yeah I do agree. The point I was making, was I just hate how in the US geopolitics seem to take a priority over stuff such as immigration & economics & don't even address how it trickles into that. They also seem legit more concerned with Ukraine than with our own border & our own struggling economy, that's the point. It does tie in, but at the same time, you also can't neglect other factors or even just the issue itself.

I need to lear more I admit, it's just demographics & economic models interest me more.

But yes, if we had no Iraq war we would have no or at least a more mitigated refugee issue.

My overall point to people here is yes, it is good to have multiple powers in the world who sort of "delegate" their own sphere, which the US could do to the Americas & still be prosperous, but people seem to rid a "slippery slope" into wanting global CCP dominance which is counterintuitive for many reasons. Since you come from a small country under occupation for most of its history, you seem to get this all well.

 

[DutchCel01]

Chinese are cucks ngl

 

[SrutalBeggs]

I am against whatever that nigger (((Schwab))) says