Serious Chadprivilege, Staceyprivilege in advocacy (and all other things).

[AnonAutist]

The blackpill/lookism is real. And we must struggle to make those above us aware of their unearned privilege.

Problem is that we will never have 'homegrown' hot people in our group who can effectively make the case for us in the media. Popular advocates of other causes are usually always above average in attractiveness and NTness. The absolute best incels can possibly muster are awkward failed normies - and they do shit on (social) media which is the most lookist of all lookism hierachies all throughout life.

How do we incels break out of this catch-22?

Hotness isn’t just a privilege, it is in some ways the ultimate privilege. It transcends other social hierarchies. Hot people are often the pioneers in breaking prejudiced ideas and advancing social causes.

From this very well written blogpost. I advise you to take 3 minutes to read it.


View: https://medium.com/@sfard/the-greatest-privilege-we-hardly-talk-about-beauty-7db3f70c1116

 

[grondilu]

" They are perceived to have better personality qualities like trustworthiness (Dewolf 2014). "

Hum, I wonder if that's somehow relates to how personality is so often brought up to explain lack of sexual success.

Also, if beauty is a privilege, it should be noticed that it implies a gender gap, because unlike women, men have not evolved to be good looking, at least not nearly as much as women did. Aesthetics is not nearly as much as an evolutionary pressure for men as it was for women.

This is my opinion, is a point that is often missed about lookism. We all know looks matters a lot, but the true blackpill is that it advantages women much more than men, because typically women are beautiful, while men are useful.

 

[Lame Dude]

Good-looks are correlated with wealth most of the time. It becomes an exponential advantage.

 

[AnonAutist]

" They are perceived to have better personality qualities like trustworthiness (Dewolf 2014). "

Hum, I wonder if that's somehow relates to how personality is so often brought up to explain lack of sexual success.

Also, if beauty is a privilege, it should be noticed that it implies a gender gap, because unlike women, men have not evolved to be good looking, at least not nearly as much as women did. Aesthetics is not nearly as much as an evolutionary pressure for men as it was for women.

No, symmetry (as a subset of 'beauty') still matters, deformity in the face is a proxy for other, deeper, genetic defects women instinctively avoid.

For men it's height and skeletal frame - as proxies for ability to win a fight that are important to a woman's primitive part of the brain (lizard brain). Others are IQ combined with NTness and leadership ability to ascend (more) complicated social hierarchies than just physical dueling.

Your place in the (social) hierarchy and the derived confidence (and the subsequent behaviour matching the confidence level) are what determine your SMV and mating success. Since we no longer fight and have to follow the law in developed societies, social games and lookism have won out over brutal strength and direct physical domination. Lookism is only gonna get more intense.

Good-looks are correlated with wealth most of the time. It becomes an exponential advantage.

Yes, beauty - certainly under conditions of assortative mating - tends to be heritable. So beautiful dynasties tend to hoard beauty and the material (wealth, resources) and immaterial (power) benefits derived from beauty.

 

[PPEcel]

This is why I think criminal sentencing guidelines ought to be as thorough as possible, because implicit biases surrounding attractiveness, race, and social class definitely play into sentencing decisions.

If possible, judges and juries shouldn't even see a photograph of the defendant.

 

[grondilu]

No, symmetry still matters, deformity in the face is a proxy for other, deeper, genetic defects.

Maybe, but maybe not. What constitutes a "deformity" is subjective anyway, at least if we ignore true anomalies with functional impairments, like a cleft lip or something.

I personally think there is a case for the idea that evolution pushed for high variance in facial features, especially for males. The rationale behind it is that facial features variance is useful to efficiently distinguish people, which is crucial for complex social cooperation. A slight asymmetry could have been favored by evolution as it makes a face more recognizable. Such high variance can easily be confused with "ugliness", which often just means "not normal" or "not pretty". Have you never thought that most beautiful people look alike ?

Also if it is correct to assess that beauty is more prevalent among females than among males, then it is hard to claim that beauty is related to genetic superiority, as male and females share the same genetic code (apart from the Y chromosome of course). Granted, there is the so-called unguarded X hypothesis that complicates the analysis but still, my point is that it's not as simple as it seems.

 

[AnonAutist]

This is why I think criminal sentencing guidelines ought to be as thorough as possible, because implicit biases surrounding attractiveness, race, and social class definitely play into sentencing decisions.

If possible, judges and juries shouldn't even see a photograph of the defendant.

Let me go full neoliberal and propose a society wide, continually updated, society wide, impartial hotness rating of every member of society - by which we can assign an adversity score on which sentencing, tax rates, scholarship size and other benefits are adjusted.




Let's facemash all of society - if incels cannot propose or promote radical 'illiberal' change or coerce society via violence, go for change via materialist, highly technocratic means. In the same vein as a hypothetical carbon tax, or the way we currently keep credit scores, record every citizen's hotness, rank it and assign penalties or benefits accordingly.

 

[PPEcel]

Let me go full neoliberal and propose a society wide, continually updated, society wide, impartial hotness rating of every member of society - by which we can assign an adversity score on which sentencing, tax rates, scholarship size and other benefits are adjusted.

Let's facemash all of society.

Sounds good.

 

[Deleted member 8970]

How about black privilege & the fact no black man can be a fucking incel? They're ALL volcels for sure. I've seen it constantly. Somebody needs to publish a well done post on this. The ugliest black dude can not only get laid but get laid with a fucking hottie. IF you think otherwise you're a retard

 

[AnonAutist]

How about black privilege & the fact no black man can be a fucking incel? They're ALL volcels for sure. I've seen it constantly. Somebody needs to publish a well done post on this. The ugliest black dude can not only get laid but get laid with a fucking hottie. IF you think otherwise you're a retard

Short, low T timid bitch ass niggers get no pussy.

 

[Deleted member 8970]

Short, low T timid bitch ass niggers get no pussy.

GIGACOPE. A black man has to be 2/10 to be incel while a white man merely has to be 5/10 or below. Fucking bullshit. Black men have WAY more sex with hot women than any other race ESPECIALLY white men. Look into it. Ugly/average blacks are fucking slayers & there are extremely few exceptions.

 

[dirtykombatcel]

No one cares and no one understands. Only we do.