Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment Calculate your SMV

IncelKing

IncelKing

Chaos is a laddER
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Posts
9,848
HEIGHT: (add one point per inch of height above 5'5)


5'5 and under = 0 points

5'6 = 1 point

5'7 = 2 points
...

5'10 = 5 points

...

6'3 = 10 points

Now minus 1 point per inch above 6'3

Eg.


6'4 = 9 points

6'5 = 8 points

...

7'1 and above = 0 points



FRAME (rate out of 10). FACE (rate out of 10)



SMV CALCULATION: (0.5 x Face) + (0.3 x Height) + (0.2 x Frame)



Comment your smv based on calculations
 
>rating frame /10
:feelstastyman:
 
Last edited:
Height rating system is too simplistic so it has a major flaw, being 7ft is only a negative if you don't have a frame to match it, there are men who have the frame though




You should create a system where you get a rating with height relative to frame, so let frame be divided by height, and if the result is in the range of 1 to 2 that's a positive rating, but if its less than 1 or more than 2 you have a negative rating, because less than one means that you are too skinny for the height and more than 2 means you are too short for the frame you have (like a barrel)
 
Last edited:
Skin tone. Being white gives you a bonus rising your SVM over that of Chaddams and Changs. Ethniks told me that, so it must be true.
 
Height rating system is too simplistic so it has a major flaw, being 7ft is only a negative if you don't have a frame to match it, there are men who have the frame though



lets be honest, even if a 7ft guy had the frame to match it, he would be way too big (both in height and width) for the average western foid who is like 5'5. Foids love height and but when height exceeds upper bound, it starts to become a disadvantage. So they would rather pick a 6'6 guy with a frame to match over a 7ft guy with a frame to match.

Just because foids like tall men doesn't mean that the taller the better. The level of attractiveness based on height follows a normal distribution, greatest attraction occurring at 6'3, with attraction decreasing for every inch of deviation from this height in either direction.
 
Last edited:
JFL at thinking 6'4'' or 6'5'' is a disadvantage. If you have the frame to make things look good you're a literal god. Also JFL at not taking race into account
 
lets be honest, even if a 7ft guy had the frame to match it, he would be way too big (both in height and width) for the average western foid who is like 5'5. Foids love height and but when height exceeds upper bound, it starts to become a disadvantage. So they would rather pick a 6'6 guy with a frame to match over a 7ft guy with a frame to match. Just because foids like tall men doesn't mean that the taller the better. The level of attractiveness based on height follows a normal distribution, with greatest attraction at 6'3, with attraction decreasing for every inch of deviation from this height.

Yeah they would rather a 6ft+ guy, but the average guy isn't that tall anyways, so in most cases as a 7ft guy you are going to be compared against men who are 5ft 7In and slightly above that, so 9/10 you will be rated higher than any man, still good odds, odds too good to make being 7ft give you a ZERO rating

Check back the post you just quoted I made an edit to explain my reasoning and how you could factor frame into the calculation to get a more realistic rating


JFL at not taking race into account

This, race is extremely significant to women when it comes to choosing a mate
 
Yeah they would rather a 6ft+ guy, but the average guy isn't that tall anyways, so in most cases as a 7ft guy you are going to be compared against men who are 5ft 7In and slightly above that, so 9/10 you will be rated higher than any man, still good odds, odds too good to make being 7ft give you a ZERO rating

Check back the post you just quoted I made an edit to explain my reasoning and how you could factor frame into the calculation to get a more realistic rating

TBH good point. I should make a rating based on height:frame ratio. Because it's all about proportions. Although no matter how good your proportions, being too big in either height or frame can be disadvantageous.
JFL at thinking 6'4'' or 6'5'' is a disadvantage.

Read my response to @BlkPillPres

Also JFL at not taking race into account

Your race is automatically factored into your face.
 
Last edited:
well what's the formula for frame/10 and face/10
 
Now minus 1 point per inch above 6'3
1477577585806
 
Height: 6'0; Frame: 3/10; Face: 1/10

SMV: 3.2/10

Asian penalty: 3.2*(0.5) = 1.6.

1.6/10. Not too bad. 16%. I'm worth less than one-sixth of a white Chad.

Good to know.
 
HEIGHT: (add one point per inch of height above 5'5)


5'5 and under = 0 points

5'6 = 1 point

5'7 = 2 points
...

5'10 = 5 points

...

6'3 = 10 points

Now minus 1 point per inch above 6'3

Eg.


6'4 = 9 points

6'5 = 8 points

...

7'1 and above = 0 points



FRAME (rate out of 10). FACE (rate out of 10)



SMV CALCULATION: (0.5 x Face) + (0.3 x Height) + (0.2 x Frame)



Comment your smv based on calculations
Height: 7
Frame: 8
Face: 5
2.5+2.1+1.6=
6.2 SMV
Seems like a faulty metric since it ignores things like inhibition, fitness, grooming and personality
 
Height = 10.
Frame = 6.
Face = 4.

I got 6.2 SMV.
 
JFL at thinking 6'4'' or 6'5'' is a disadvantage. If you have the frame to make things look good you're a literal god. Also JFL at not taking race into account
race is tied into face since it determines phenotype. We cant just say -3 for curries since they might be light skin. Theres different kinds of them.
 
how the hell am i suppose to calculate face?
 
does frame really matter all that much?
 
how the hell am i suppose to calculate face?

Post a couple headshots on one of those "rate me" sites.

Or you could use a site like this
 
Last edited:
FIGHTING SUCCESS!!

What % of men can you beat up. Divide that by 10 and there’s your SMV
 
FIGHTING SUCCESS!!

What % of men can you beat up. Divide that by 10 and there’s your SMV
Don't forget fame and status. James Holmes has a wall full of 7+/10 foids you wrote him letters in prison.

Fighting success is a combination of fitness and inverse inhibition.
 
Pretty useless because most people can't rate.
 
2,9
But fuck that retarded system, use metric, superior and more cultured
 
2,9
But fuck that retarded system, use metric, superior and more cultured
Superior, yeah right. Compare the number of ways to divide 5280 into whole units compared to 1000.

Factors of 5280:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 20, 22, 24, 30, 32, 33, 40, 44, 48, 55, 60, 66, 80, 88, 96, 110, 120, 132, 160, 165, 176, 220, 240, 264, 330, 352, 440, 480, 528, 660, 880, 1056, 1320, 1760, 2640, 5280

Factors of 1000:
1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 10, 20, 25, 40, 50, 100, 125, 200, 250, 500, 1000

Imperial mogs metric
 
The Chad metric vs the Virgin imperial
Because everything is superior when it is uniform and based on 10 right? A measurement system shouldn't be about practicality but conformity and uniformity in your mind.
 
high tier normie? if you can't ascend what hope is there for the rest of us?
Tbh face is the most important factor. If you're below a 6-7 PSL you can't get shit in the West.
 
How the fuck do I rate frame?
 
shit, this is my SMV 10^-30
 
Potential bragging thread over here.
 
I'm bad at mafffs
 
Post a couple headshots on one of those "rate me" sites.

Or you could use a site like this
those facial analyzing sites are bs I always get high scores
 
lets be honest, even if a 7ft guy had the frame to match it, he would be way too big (both in height and width) for the average western foid who is like 5'5. Foids love height and but when height exceeds upper bound, it starts to become a disadvantage. So they would rather pick a 6'6 guy with a frame to match over a 7ft guy with a frame to match.

Just because foids like tall men doesn't mean that the taller the better. The level of attractiveness based on height follows a normal distribution, greatest attraction occurring at 6'3, with attraction decreasing for every inch of deviation from this height in either direction.
brainlet, women would love to date 7 ft men, but theyre more uncommon
 
I'm still a 4/10.
Realistically speaking, because of how women rate male attractiveness i'm more like a 2 or less
 
:feelstastyman: rating of this is a straight 10.
 
Height = 2
Frame = 7
Face = 5

(0.5 × 5) + (0.3 × 2) + (0.2 × 7) = 4.5
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top