Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Buddha was 6'7" (200cm tall).

Stop it lol. Nobody know for sure what his height was. Case closed.
You have little evidence to prove that he was NOT 200cm.

And something else: Not answering doesn't mean you're correct.
 
You have little evidence to prove that he was NOT 200cm.

And something else: Not answering doesn't mean you're correct.

That's what I'm saying nobody can say for sure what height he was.

stop bringing this up.
 
Buddha was a chad
full
 
That's what I'm saying nobody can say for sure what height he was.

stop bringing this up.
Take this logically: Why wouldn normal people listen to a rich prince? Do you think people would listen to a manlet? People respect tall leaders more. By that logic we don't know if he was really a rich prince. Might as well doubt his existence at this point (although certainly we don't know if he really existed).
 
Take this logically: Why wouldn normal people listen to a rich prince? Do you think people would listen to a manlet? People respect tall leaders more. By that logic we don't know if he was really a rich prince. Might as well doubt his existence at this point (although certainly we don't know if he really existed).

Gandhi was a manlet and lots of people listened and followed him.

Buddha was a prince because that is in the records. His height is not mentioned anywhere in the records.
 
I like buddhism bcos of reincarnation, meaning likely we were chads in our previous rebirths and is possible to become chad in future rebirths.

However the point of buddhism isn't even to be chad or to go to heaven and enjoy there because once your 'good' karma has used up, you'll rebirth as a lower being eg. Animals, insects or a poor human, the point is to exit this cycle(samsara) and reach nirvana. It's a lot easier said than done though, not something that happens overnight, if you have the opportunity to learn buddhism, try your best and learn.
Wheel life 01 734x1030
 
Gandhi was a manlet and lots of people listened and followed him.

Buddha was a prince because that is in the records. His height is not mentioned anywhere in the records.
But Gandhi was handsome (for an Indian):
Mohandas-Karamchand-Gandhi.jpg

Napoleon was 5'7'' and had the whole backing of France, enough to crown himself as Emperor.
Man, back then people were malnourished and short. Napoleon, being 1,69m, wasn't short.
 
Halo effect so strong that it formed a religion
 
I like buddhism bcos of reincarnation, meaning likely we were chads in our previous rebirths and is possible to become chad in future rebirths.

However the point of buddhism isn't even to be chad or to go to heaven and enjoy there because once your 'good' karma has used up, you'll rebirth as a lower being eg. Animals, insects or a poor human, the point is to exit this cycle(samsara) and reach nirvana. It's a lot easier said than done though, not something that happens overnight, if you have the opportunity to learn buddhism, try your best and learn.
View attachment 176260

I did read a decent amount of information regarding that topic. In the end, it is most likely nothing but a cope. Also lol at the female genitalia at the top right and top left of the picture.
 
Take this logically: Why wouldn normal people listen to a rich prince? Do you think people would listen to a manlet? People respect tall leaders more. By that logic we don't know if he was really a rich prince. Might as well doubt his existence at this point (although certainly we don't know if he really existed).
Buddhism has blackpills, I learnt that decent looks are needed to spread the teachings so that common people will be interested n listen to the teachings. There are even things u can do if you want to look better in future rebirth. But that is not the goal of buddhism. There are a lot of blackpills in buddhist teachings.

Source: used to attend Buddhist lessons
 
He wasn't short compared to factory workers and the poor. But he was still short compared to middle classes and above who were taller.

But Gandhi was handsome (for an Indian):
Mohandas-Karamchand-Gandhi.jpg

Nah that's just bullshit now. Gandhi was an average looking fellow. Plus he was very dark. He still had White British followers.
 

Similar threads

Q
Replies
26
Views
416
Ventingblackpiller
Ventingblackpiller
CopingForBrutality
Replies
10
Views
465
CopingForBrutality
CopingForBrutality
Zhou Chang-Xing
Replies
5
Views
208
Norville Wood
Norville Wood
SlayerSlayer
Replies
33
Views
2K
IronsideCel
IronsideCel
Confessor
Replies
7
Views
292
To koniec
To koniec

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top