Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Britain should've never given up Hong Kong

RSH

RSH

Enemy of the Mechanism
Joined
Jun 11, 2025
Posts
23
In 1841, The British Empire conquered a few small fishing villages and islands in South China during the opium war with the Qing Dynasty. from 1841-1997 those small fishing villages were transformed by the British into an a sprawling metropolis, economic powerhouse and the largest bastion of free trade the world had ever seen, residents had access to world-class public education, a healthcare system that gave them the highest life expectancy on Earth and some of the best and most affordable public transport. Many Chinese people fled from Mao Zedong's tyranny to British Hong Kong after the communist revolution in 1949 because Hong Kong was one of the only British colonies where it's Cantonese subjects were treated fairly and had access to high salaries and enough food. Hong Kong as a result of this has always been very culturally distinct from mainland China especially due to their British influence with many Hong Kongers being fluent in English even to this day, almost 30 years after we gave Hong Kong up and It's worth noting that Hong Kongers are Cantonese speakers which is a completely distinct language and culture with a separate history from Mandarin which is the primary language of mainland China. And for these reasons, the vast majority of Hong Kongers didn't want to join mainland China and were even scared of what would happen to their culture, language and economy if the communist Chinese took control which is why I believe that that the British handover of Hong Kong to the communist bastards in the mainland was a betrayal by the British government to the millions of Hong Kongers who valued the freedom and independence they were granted under the British, this was nothing short of undemocratic abandonment by Britain of it's own citizens (Hong Kongers were British citizens). Ever since the communists have taken over Hong Kong, things have gone from bad to worse for it's residents: the numerous freedoms of Hong Kong provided by the British (which is what made it the world's most free market and so rich) were rolled back and this significantly damaged the economy as well as the freedom of residents, Hong Kong's government-owned land was sold to private companies leading to property prices being jacked up like crazy, resulting in a housing crisis that is only worsening with time and the Cantonese culture and language is being progressively erased with time by the communists and any public dissent in Hong Kong results in imprisonment due to the national security law the communists forced onto Hong Kong. In 1997 the Brits agreed with the commies that Hong Kong and the mainland would function as 'one country, two systems' where Hong Kong could keep its free market capitalism and separate democratic government even though it's still part of China however China was the one that could chose the governmental candidates which allowed it to force Hong Kong to be run by communist sympathisers who act in the interest of the mainland which is how the communists have been able to indirectly control Hong Kong and mistreat its residents. If Britain maintained control of Hong Kong, it would be significantly more free, democratic, wealthy and prosperous and the Cantonese locals would be able to freely express their culture without risk of imprisonment.
 
I'm just here for the cheap opium.
 
Shut up basterd benchod!
 
I ain't reading any of that but more colonisation so sure
 
In 1841, The British Empire conquered a few small fishing villages and islands in South China during the opium war with the Qing Dynasty. from 1841-1997 those small fishing villages were transformed by the British into an a sprawling metropolis, economic powerhouse and the largest bastion of free trade the world had ever seen, residents had access to world-class public education, a healthcare system that gave them the highest life expectancy on Earth and some of the best and most affordable public transport. Many Chinese people fled from Mao Zedong's tyranny to British Hong Kong after the communist revolution in 1949 because Hong Kong was one of the only British colonies where it's Cantonese subjects were treated fairly and had access to high salaries and enough food. Hong Kong as a result of this has always been very culturally distinct from mainland China especially due to their British influence with many Hong Kongers being fluent in English even to this day, almost 30 years after we gave Hong Kong up and It's worth noting that Hong Kongers are Cantonese speakers which is a completely distinct language and culture with a separate history from Mandarin which is the primary language of mainland China. And for these reasons, the vast majority of Hong Kongers didn't want to join mainland China and were even scared of what would happen to their culture, language and economy if the communist Chinese took control which is why I believe that that the British handover of Hong Kong to the communist bastards in the mainland was a betrayal by the British government to the millions of Hong Kongers who valued the freedom and independence they were granted under the British, this was nothing short of undemocratic abandonment by Britain of it's own citizens (Hong Kongers were British citizens). Ever since the communists have taken over Hong Kong, things have gone from bad to worse for it's residents: the numerous freedoms of Hong Kong provided by the British (which is what made it the world's most free market and so rich) were rolled back and this significantly damaged the economy as well as the freedom of residents, Hong Kong's government-owned land was sold to private companies leading to property prices being jacked up like crazy, resulting in a housing crisis that is only worsening with time and the Cantonese culture and language is being progressively erased with time by the communists and any public dissent in Hong Kong results in imprisonment due to the national security law the communists forced onto Hong Kong. In 1997 the Brits agreed with the commies that Hong Kong and the mainland would function as 'one country, two systems' where Hong Kong could keep its free market capitalism and separate democratic government even though it's still part of China however China was the one that could chose the governmental candidates which allowed it to force Hong Kong to be run by communist sympathisers who act in the interest of the mainland which is how the communists have been able to indirectly control Hong Kong and mistreat its residents. If Britain maintained control of Hong Kong, it would be significantly more free, democratic, wealthy and prosperous and the Cantonese locals would be able to freely express their culture without risk of imprisonment.
The transfer of Hong Kong to China was logical. As you plan to stop the PLA invasion of Hong Kong, you will have to use a huge route to transfer troops to defend the city. You can't even use the threat of using nuclear weapons, because China has them too. And most importantly, how will you quarrel with a country where your own large corporations and rich people earn a lot of money through cheap, practically slave labor and human rights violations.
 
In 1841, The British Empire conquered a few small fishing villages and islands in South China during the opium war with the Qing Dynasty. from 1841-1997 those small fishing villages were transformed by the British into an a sprawling metropolis, economic powerhouse and the largest bastion of free trade the world had ever seen, residents had access to world-class public education, a healthcare system that gave them the highest life expectancy on Earth and some of the best and most affordable public transport. Many Chinese people fled from Mao Zedong's tyranny to British Hong Kong after the communist revolution in 1949 because Hong Kong was one of the only British colonies where it's Cantonese subjects were treated fairly and had access to high salaries and enough food. Hong Kong as a result of this has always been very culturally distinct from mainland China especially due to their British influence with many Hong Kongers being fluent in English even to this day, almost 30 years after we gave Hong Kong up and It's worth noting that Hong Kongers are Cantonese speakers which is a completely distinct language and culture with a separate history from Mandarin which is the primary language of mainland China. And for these reasons, the vast majority of Hong Kongers didn't want to join mainland China and were even scared of what would happen to their culture, language and economy if the communist Chinese took control which is why I believe that that the British handover of Hong Kong to the communist bastards in the mainland was a betrayal by the British government to the millions of Hong Kongers who valued the freedom and independence they were granted under the British, this was nothing short of undemocratic abandonment by Britain of it's own citizens (Hong Kongers were British citizens). Ever since the communists have taken over Hong Kong, things have gone from bad to worse for it's residents: the numerous freedoms of Hong Kong provided by the British (which is what made it the world's most free market and so rich) were rolled back and this significantly damaged the economy as well as the freedom of residents, Hong Kong's government-owned land was sold to private companies leading to property prices being jacked up like crazy, resulting in a housing crisis that is only worsening with time and the Cantonese culture and language is being progressively erased with time by the communists and any public dissent in Hong Kong results in imprisonment due to the national security law the communists forced onto Hong Kong. In 1997 the Brits agreed with the commies that Hong Kong and the mainland would function as 'one country, two systems' where Hong Kong could keep its free market capitalism and separate democratic government even though it's still part of China however China was the one that could chose the governmental candidates which allowed it to force Hong Kong to be run by communist sympathisers who act in the interest of the mainland which is how the communists have been able to indirectly control Hong Kong and mistreat its residents. If Britain maintained control of Hong Kong, it would be significantly more free, democratic, wealthy and prosperous and the Cantonese locals would be able to freely express their culture without risk of imprisonment.
Among other things, many in the 1990s believed in the end of history Francis Fakuyama's , that after the end of the cold war and the fall of the USSR, there would be no more reasons for wars around the world, and in general, that market capitalism and liberal democracy would spread to every corner of the planet. At the time of the 1990s, China and the United States were still de facto allies since the 1970s.
 
You want more rich chinks in your country buying up all the property?
 
Australia, Canada & New Zealand didn't deserve independence too.
 
chinese and east and southeast asian countries in general alleviate inceldom better than the western world does so think that china reclaiming hong kong was a net benefit for inceldom

china should look to fully incorporate hong kong and macau, and to take back taiwan
 
UK is the most cucked nation. I'd rather live in China than there. More civil liberties.
 

Similar threads

Subhuman Niceguy
Replies
11
Views
514
LeFrenchCel
LeFrenchCel
DarkStar
Replies
40
Views
1K
TheGrayWolf
TheGrayWolf
161
Replies
6
Views
339
Buried Alive 2.0
Buried Alive 2.0

Users who are viewing this thread

  • MarsDDDDD
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top