Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

LifeFuel Bring back Noble Traditional 19th+20th century White Russian Culture! THE WORLD NEEDS WHITE ARISTOCRACY TO INSPIRE THEM OUT OF THEIR SUBHUMANITY

Why? :feelsree::feelsree::feelsree: Whites deserve to be restored to their rightful place as the rulers of the world!
Why? Who gives a shit about the white race and other shit like that? The true masters of the world don't give a fuck! Or is that "not fair" according to your sentimental ass?
 
Subhumans didn't crawl from the bowels of slum they remained there playing with technology they were given to advance their way of life to be more destructive and dangerous. They can't evolve past losing hair and appearing more human, it's like uncanny valley. Only way to change this is gene editing or eugenics, by first globalizing the government so no pods of Jews called nations interrupt this progress. And no, we can't allow foids to birth kids ever again, they will still choose some low IQ fuck as long as he tingles her hypergamy twat to spread "superior" genes. It's time we let machine do this to cultivate ACTUAL superior genes that reflect the human condition and our mind. Something that a lot of women can't understand or are too sadistic to.
 
Last edited:
Wont happen brocel. Each yeat things get worse and worse and foids get more degenerate while the world burns slowly. So i advice to sit back relax and accept it wont happen and that its over
 
When the world is mine, it'll still be a white person in charge.
 
Or is that "not fair" according to your sentimental ass?
Its not fair that a weak fearful parasitic satanic degenerate gets to rule humanity and desecrate it.
 
Its not fair that a weak fearful parasitic satanic degenerate gets to rule humanity and desecrate it.
And what is it that makes them weak? How are they weak when they rule the world?
 
Why? Who gives a shit about the white race and other shit like that? The true masters of the world don't give a fuck! Or is that "not fair" according to your sentimental ass?
He is still strung up about "beautiful" white women, that phase will pass eventually.
 
Lack of physical strength.

Deception.
Why should anyone accept physical strength as something important? If nature/evolution honors deception more (i.e. makes it more pragmatic) is that not what we should honor, as it increases our power as well? The world simply works that way and who are you to say it's wrong?
 
19-20 century be like:
H 00536582 2087564113
 
Why should anyone accept physical strength as something important?
Because its essential for most of our daily life activities. Sedentary living behind a computer screen and desk doesn't keep civilization running. What keeps things running is being able to fight, build things, fix things, move things, and defend things.
 
Because its essential for most of our daily life activities. Sedentary living behind a computer screen and desk doesn't keep civilization running. What keeps things running is being able to fight, build things, fix things, move things, and defend things.
Are those things for master or for slave to do? Isn't what makes master a master is that he can do whatever the fuck he wants (just enjoy his life)? All he really can't escape doing is keeping the slaves in check, mostly through deception but sometimes through military strength (through slave army) in the modern world.

The values of honor, strength, work, protection, etc. are slave values. Master values only power and does not care how this power comes about.
 
Are those things for master or for slave to do? Isn't what makes master a master is that he can do whatever the fuck he wants (just enjoy his life)? All he really can't escape doing is keeping the slaves in check, mostly through deception but sometimes through military strength (through slave army) in the modern world.

The values of honor, strength, work, protection, etc. are slave values. Master values only power and does not care how this power comes about.
Jews swear by slave morality, not master morality. Master morality is about true superiority, especially in the physical aspect. A master and ruler has to be superior to the people he rules over otherwise there's no value in the dominance hierarchy.
 
Jews swear by slave morality, not master morality. Master morality is about true superiority, especially in the physical aspect. A master and ruler has to be superior to the people he rules over otherwise there's no value in the dominance hierarchy.
Lol you literally think that you are overman because you lift weights but Bill Gates is a slave because he's a "computer nerd" :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
While Bill Gates is the one who implements eugenics programs over Africa and roots out those he deems "unfit" for his beautiful planet Earth :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

Over which man are you retards "overmen" exactly when you can't command a kitchen staff?

The thing is, the people in charge actually just display "slave morality" because it's good for PR. In fact, they are your ideal and all that you don't like about them is their PR campaign i.e. aesthetics. And why would they give a fuck about their physical strength in the modern world when they can have whole armed armies protecting them. They are pragmatists (unlike you), that's why they are where they are.
 
Lol you literally think that you are overman because you lift weights but Bill Gates is a slave because he's a "computer nerd" :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
He's physically a subhuman. Mentally obviously not.
While Bill Gates is the one who implements eugenics programs over Africa and roots out those he deems "unfit" for his beautiful planet Earth :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
He's also in favor of the neoliberal order and the COVID vaccine which has killed or crippled lots of Whites. He also wants Whites to give up meat which would only destroy them further physiologically. He's in favor of giving third world countries welfare money so that they don't revolt against the Anglo-Jewish neoliberal order. He's no eugenicist in the truest sense. A eugenicist would be in favor of genocide, euthanasia and selective breeding.
 
And why would they give a fuck about their physical strength in the modern world when they can have whole armed armies protecting them.
They should because violence is the sole authority from which all other authority is derived. How do you think military coups take place?
 
He's also in favor of the neoliberal order and the COVID vaccine which has killed or crippled lots of Whites. He also wants Whites to give up meat which would only destroy them further physiologically. He's in favor of giving third world countries welfare money so that they don't revolt against the Anglo-Jewish neoliberal order. He's no eugenicist in the truest sense. A eugenicist would be in favor of genocide, euthanasia and selective breeding.
He is in favor of all of the goals of eugenics except that:
  1. He puts up a completely different image, as it is more effective not to be open about it.
  2. His methods may not be "true" methods according to you (not matching your "br00tal white man master" aesthetic taste).
  3. He does not support the "true" masters, which is obviously the (whole, if you are male and not disabled ofc) white race.
For Bill Gates the true masters are people of his class (money), not of his race (genetics). What he does to white people is nothing compared to what he does to every fucking other "subhuman" (lower class).
They should because violence is the sole authority from which all other authority is derived. How do you think military coups take place?
And having armies is not enough violence for you?
 
He is in favor of all of the goals of eugenics except that:
  1. He puts up a completely different image, as it is more effective not to be open about it.
  2. His methods may not be "true" methods according to you (not matching your "br00tal white man master" aesthetic taste).
  3. He does not support the "true" masters, which is obviously the (whole, if you are male and not disabled ofc) white race.
For Bill Gates the true masters are people of his class (money), not of his race (genetics). What he does to white people is nothing compared to what he does to every fucking other "subhuman" (lower class).
I don't disagree but he's just too sheepish and unmasculine of a man for me to consider a leader. He's a leader for the sheepish neoliberal coastal elites who think their neoliberal civilization will last forever. A true leader would embrace the physical side of the human and mammalian experience, not reject it in favor of an unhealthy sedentary diabetic living behind a computer screen. I don't disrespect him because he's a computer nerd. I disrespect him because he envisions a style of living where people have given up their internal vigor which is just unhealthy to me.
And having armies is not enough violence for you?
No, directing those armies to conquer lands and entire populations is violence.
 
I don't disagree but he's just too sheepish and unmasculine of a man for me to consider a leader. He's a leader for the sheepish neoliberal coastal elites who think their neoliberal civilization will last forever. A true leader would embrace the physical side of the human and mammalian experience, not reject it in favor of an unhealthy sedentary diabetic living behind a computer screen. I don't disrespect him because he's a computer nerd. I disrespect him because he envisions a style of living where people have given up their internal vigor which is just unhealthy to me.
I agree with your sentiment, but I think the problem is that you think animality is a consequence of the loss of mastery. It's actually the other way around, it's a consequence of the loss of slavery. I know this is kind of convoluted and unintuitive but I don't have time (and willingness) to explain it right now. If you are still interested I can write a really good post on this tho if given time.
No, directing those armies to conquer lands and entire populations is violence.
As if that's not what Western (Anglo-Jewish) imperialism is all about. How is what you want different from what we already have except in advertising campaign?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top