It was literally never a 'simple subtraction' you ugly whore. Please just get breast cancer and die already.
Boomerette Showcases Why They're the Most Retarded Generation [Twitter] [Mathpill]
It was literally never a 'simple subtraction' you ugly whore. Please just get breast cancer and die already.
185? Mogs me to hell and back
>What has changed?
YOU CHANGED, YOU CHANGED THE ENTIRE COUNTRY BY VOTING IN SHITSKINS WHILST SIMULTANEOUSLY MANAGING TO BE THE MOST GREEDY CUNTS EVER THAT PURCHASED UP ALL THE PROPERTY SO THAT YOU CAN SIPHON MONEY AWAY FROM WAGESLAVES JUST LIKE YOUR JEWISH OVERLORDS TAUGHT YOU TO
YOU CHANGED, YOU CHANGED THE ENTIRE COUNTRY BY VOTING IN SHITSKINS WHILST SIMULTANEOUSLY MANAGING TO BE THE MOST GREEDY CUNTS EVER THAT PURCHASED UP ALL THE PROPERTY SO THAT YOU CAN SIPHON MONEY AWAY FROM WAGESLAVES JUST LIKE YOUR JEWISH OVERLORDS TAUGHT YOU TO
Kill them.
lol this is just engagement bait. By the evan guy i mean no way he has a phd at 20.
Nature, despite the cunt she is, will be doing that for us soon enough.
Ask an AI to come up with a picture step by step diagram to solve this. That would look funny.
I cant wait.
Wait, am I just too tired and sick or just dumb?
D
Neither, you just need to create the initial equations and then it's easy.
m + p = 200
m - p = 170
m - m + p + p = 200 - 170
2p = 30
p = 15
2p = 30
p = 15
Grok:
Gemini:
And ChatGPT wouldn't even give me anything that wasn't text for some reason.
the second arrow doesn't go all the way to the top, if it did the answer would have been 30, but it doesn't
boomers can barely walk at this point though, like c'mon
all boomers did this whether they voted for it or not
they raised their daughters to be infertile whores -> government brings in 300,000 poojeets overnight because of work visas
applies whether you live in washington or a remote croatian village
Mathmogger.
i mean literally it's just the arrow's height, you don't need any fucking equations
this is a water level puzzle in disguise, which foids are notoriously unable to solve
this is a water level puzzle in disguise, which foids are notoriously unable to solve
Dumb bitch probably thinks the answer is 30
I've been dying of laughter for the past 10 minutes just because you sent this lmfao, I never knew about this until now.
Ok, I am just dumb then.
D
Not necessarily. You just need to learn to break down problems into basic equations and go from there. Just assign variables and form equations based on the numbers given.
I think I could get back into it, since I've done this at school and was successful at it.
It's just been so long and I have not had anything to do with it for ages.
I think one would have to oractice thisz every now and then.
You're not dumb at all. Like Dead End said, you just have to know how to break the problem down. Anything that has two unknown variables will always require a system of equations to solve desu.
I mean, I understood it one @Dead End explained it.
Mogs me, I have been trying to teach myself Math recently and that's the only reason I was able to get this.
Teaching yourself something is the best solution, imo. The things that I know well and can do well I have taught myself.
x + y = 200
x - y = 170
2x = 370
x = 185
y = 15
Edit: I see the solution has already been posted.
x - y = 170
2x = 370
x = 185
y = 15
Edit: I see the solution has already been posted.
I actually forgot you can treat systems of equations like that lmfao
185 tall man over
I absolutely loved solving algebraic-equation problems in high school. Probably why I was so drawn to programming when I discovered it in my later years.
Don't take the Parrotpill
I sometimes like treating them as puzzles. But, admittedly, that's usually just because I'm severely retarded and have to unironically spend the most egregious amounts of time on the most simple problems.
Just today, in my textbook, I had to solve the following problem—"the length of a rectangular lawn is 3 feet longer than its width. The area of the lawn is 70ft^2. How long is the length in feet?"
I'm proud of myself because I'm certain that the problem is going to be super easy. It's obvious that the two variables are literally just [w] and [w + 3] for the length. Multiply those together and you get [(w)(w + 3) = 70ft^2]. I can immediately find the product and then get to [w^2 + 3w = 70ft^2].
I THEN PROCEEDED TO GET STUCK ON THIS STEP FOR AN ENTIRE. FUCKING. HOUR.
I tried literally everything in my head, desperately searching for a single CLUE as to what the next step even looked like—but it WOULD ALWAYS LEAD TO SOMETHING REDUNDANT LIKE [ w = (70ft^2) / (w) - 3 ]. And if it wasn't redundant, it was nonsense.
I unironically, and perhaps stemming from boredom, led myself to the answer of [ w = |8ftw^2| + (w)√(6)(ft)^2 - √(3w) ]. At that point, I couldn't help but to just dryly chuckle at my retardation. I even ended up making a stupid little meme out of it.
I EVENTUALLY actually ended up solving it after restraining myself from glancing at my textbook for the solution. I revisited a thought I had earlier about how the rectangle actually looks and how convenient it would be if I simply had two separate squares—one being a perfect square with [w^2], and the other being whatever remained of the extra length [ w + 3] brought. That was the moment I realized that exact thought sounded really similar to the method I wrote about in my notebook where you literally 'complete the square' by adding stuff to both sides of the equation.
I did have to actually go back to my notebook to remember how to actually apply the method to begin with, but I eventually got [ w^2 + 3w + 2.25 = 72.25ft^2 ], and then simplified it down until I finally arrived at [ w = 7ft ].
Putting aside the chagrin I felt—I was pretty proud of myself for finally figuring it out. Well, until I glanced at the textbook and they solved it through simply using the quadratic formula, that was...
Yeah!
x² + 3x - 70 = 0
x² + 10x - 7x - 70 = 0
x = 7 or -10.
But I'm glad you took your own unique approach to solving it. I remember scribbling on the back pages of my notebooks to come up with unique ways to optimize the calculation of a multiplication. I didn't even realize I was tapping into number theory.
D
Do you still program? Which languages do you know/use?
Before getting a job, I used to program in almost all the popular langs except Java. Typescript, right now, is my bread and butter. You a fellow programmercel as well?
D
Just a hobbyist, I enjoy programming and learning about it a lot though. I've been programming since middle school, mostly just in Python doing automation scripts and also just learning for the sake of it. Have made some projects in Unity (C#) and Godot (Gdscript, similar to Python) as well.
Want to get into low-level programming as well at some point. I'm thinking of pursuing cpp more in-depth.
I'd suggest starting with C and sticking with it for at least a few months (making small programs) before getting into CPP.
D
Ok, thanks for the advice. Any small projects in particular you'd recommend for learning C?
You could try implementing your own hash map in C since C doesn't actually have that data structure.
I could solve it! Win for retardcels. 
D
Ok. Thanks for the recommendations
I will begin learning C when I get internet back (my parents shut off the internet until I begin exercising daily or go on medications, my phone's mobile hotspot doesn't work currently either).
M
I could solve it! Win for retardcels.
youre not retarded thenSimilar threads
SubhumanOldcel
Users who are viewing this thread
