The fact is that the Drug War and the Sex Cult have been scientifically refuted, but like all religiously psychotic people the believers in them seem to either be incapable of comprehending this or otherwise caring about it. It doesn't matter how much evidence you show them demonstrating as much. You can show them the highest impact factor science journals regarding the matter and it is like you didn't even show them anything. No matter what they rationalize their belief in the fiction materials of their establishment of religion, which they are fanatically committed to, which they spend untold millions of dollars of value organizing and promoting.
There is little that can be done regarding the matter apparently, even though what is manifesting in the USA is unambiguously unconstitutional, illegal, and constitutes the crime of treason. Even though there is absolutely no actual valid legitimacy to these movements, even though the constitution forbids them, even though all respect paid to them and laws passed based on the belief in their fiction materials is forbidden, it simply doesn't matter because the believers in these establishments of religion will just manifest cognitive anosognosia if push really comes to shove, and it's like arguing with an anosognosic stroke victim at that point, which is essentially entirely a waste of time, or at least I've had no luck with the religiously insane.
Objective: Poor insight is a cardinal symptom of schizophrenia that, while not universally and uniformly expressed in all patients, is among the most common of its manifestations. Available neurobiological and neurocognitive evidence linking the phenomenon ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Anosognosia in Schizophrenia: Hidden in Plain Sight
...
“I don’t need medicine—there is nothing wrong with me. I just came here for a check-up.”
Recognizing one's own bad behavior
www.psychologytoday.com
Anosognosia is defined as the impaired ability of patients with neurological disorders to recognize the presence or adequately appreciate the severity of their deficits [1]. Torrey (2012) cites three examples of anosognosic patients; a stroke victim with a paralyzed arm claimed he couldn’t lift it because he had a shirt on; a woman with paralysis in her left arm was asked to raise it, and instead raised her left leg. When this was pointed out to her she responded that some people call it an arm, others a leg, and jokingly inquired as to the difference; the Supreme Court Justice, William Douglas, was paralyzed on his left side. He claimed this was a myth, and was still inviting people to go hiking [2].
Anosognosia for hemiplegia has seen a century of almost continuous research, yet a definitive understanding of its mechanism remains elusive. Essentia…
www.sciencedirect.com
Essentially, anosognosic patients hold quasi-delusional beliefs about their paralysed limbs, in spite of all the contrary evidence, repeated questioning, and logical argument.
Just replace limbs with "genre of intension" and there is essentially no difference. In spite of all of the contrary evidence, which is the highest impact science literature regarding the matter and the position of the pertinent academic community regarding the matter,
www.springer.com
Could making child pornography legal lead to lower rates of child sex abuse? It could well do, according to a new study by Milton Diamond, from the University of Hawaii, and colleagues.
Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA), that rape and other sex crimes have not increased following the legalization and wide availability of pornography. And most significantly, the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen considerably since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible – a phenomenon also seen in Denmark and Japan. Their findings are published online today in Springer’s journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.
The findings support the theory that potential sexual offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex crimes against children
en.wikipedia.org
Impact factor (2017) 3.223
The journal was established in 1971 by Richard Green, who served as its editor-in-chief until 2001.[1] He was succeeded by Kenneth J. Zucker.[1] It is published by Springer Science+Business Media[2] and has become a leading journal in its field.[3] Associated with its editorial board and the International Academy of Sex Research are many of the world's leading figures in gender and sexuality research, including Richard Green, Kenneth Zucker, Milton Diamond, Michael Baily, and Carol Martin.
Archives of Sexual Behavior is abstracted and indexed in Biological Abstracts, Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, EMBASE, Family & Society Studies Worldwide, Health and Safety Science Abstracts, Index Medicus/MEDLINE, Psychological Abstracts, PsycINFO, Referativny Zhurnal, Risk Abstracts, Sage Family Studies Abstracts, Scopus, Sexual and Relations Therapy, Social Sciences Citation Index, Social Science Index,Sociological Abstracts, Studies on Women & Gender Abstracts, and Violence and Abuse Abstracts.[2] According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal's 2013 impact factor is 2.783.[4] Based on the 2011 impact factor (3.52), of 2,943 Social Science journals, Archives was ranked 102nd (96th percentile). Of 109 journals classified as Psychology (Clinical), Archives was ranked 11th (90th percentile). Of 89 journals classified as Social Science, Interdisciplinary, Archives was ranked 1st. [5]
Despite the repeated questioning about their stereotyped argumentation that is clearly logically fallacious, such as not caring that people can see a video of a child have his heart cut out but thinking that even a 17 year old can't take a picture of his dick without abusing himself.
Despite the logical argumentation to the contrary and so on, they eternally cling to their delusional belief in the fiction materials of their establishments of religion. It isn't even quasi-delusional, they are full blown psychotic decompensatory and cognitively anosognosic.
“However, what he didn’t turn his mind to at the time is that merely having possession and viewing images such as this does victimize and hurt the individual portrayed in the image. He appreciates that now.” Senior gets jail time, probation for having single image of child pornography We at...
human-stupidity.com
“merely having possession and viewing images such as this does victimize and hurt the individual portrayed in the image.” This is some mystical religious thinking. Like in Voodoo. And note, this was said by a respectable lawyer to appease a judge. And this logic is used over and over, for example by Australian Government web sites.
When police searched Michael Jachim's bedroom in March, they found a safe. Inside it was a cache of DVDs labeled "Twisted Sisters." They were not music videos. On Tuesday, a DuPage County judge is scheduled to rule whether Jachim will go to prison for child pornography. Prosecutors said his DVD...
www.dailyherald.com
"... every time somebody looks at that image it's like the crime is taking place all over again…"
CLEVELAND — The former pastor of St. Andrew’s Presbyterian Church in Olmsted Falls will spend the next six years behind bars for downloading child pornography.Reverend Dr. Mark Griggs, 50, of…
fox8.com
"we hear that in court that they feel like they are victimized every single time someone downloads their videos or looks at their videos they feel like they are being raped all over again,” said Canonico
Child pornography is an inexcusable crime and an arrogant exploitation of our future generation. While it takes just common sense to refrain from committing such crimes, we discuss about five gruesome facts on child pornography for those that can't realize the disastrous outcomes of the crime.
www.counselheal.com
The children might feel like being raped time and again when someone watches it.
It's really amazing to see how despite an ocean of evidence refuting them, despite the fact that they don't actually have anything in support of them --- with nearly everything they put forth being severely eviscerated when held up to even the slightest scrutiny ---- despite the fact that they are unambiguously wrong as one would imagine any thinking human could simply reason to realizing, but which the near totality of the scientific literature makes abundantly clear to any who would for whatever reason imagine otherwise.
Despite all of this, they continue clinging to the fiction materials of their establishment of religion and acting as if they are referencing actual reality through them rather than the delusional imaginations of schizophrenics.
They are mentally ill, unambiguously. Indeed, they are convergently psychotic and concomitantly cognitively anosognosic, and they reference likewise themed collections of fiction materials as if they were referencing actual reality through them rather than the delusional imaginations of convergences of psychotic decompensating schizophrenics and manics.
They are the adherents to scientifically refuted 20th century establishments of religion that they are incapable of ending their belief in. It's really scary, bizarre, and somewhat interesting but primarily alarming because of the fact that they are in power and literally reigning terror against the disbelievers in the scientifically refuted fantasy worlds described in their genres of scientifically refuted religious fiction materials.
I keep hoping that they will eventually just all wake up, as is predicted to happen eventually, but who knows how long it will be. I feel pretty much like my life is already over and wasted though. I had the misfortune of having lived the majority of my life in the dark ages period of the early 21st century, when the believers in the fiction materials of the subsequently refuted 20th century establishments of religion had come to completely dominate the United States of America and world, and in which life had no value because of the government's willingness to simply enslave everyone, when people lived in terror, simply because psychotic religious terrorists couldn't end their belief in their scientifically refuted fiction materials.
I don't even know how to feel any longer honestly. I am not so much scared any longer regarding the issue, as I am just entirely hopeless regarding it and the future of humanity as a whole. I used to be upset when I would post endless evidence demonstrating my correctness while people acted as if they had opinions on the matter despite refusing to read anything I said. I used to be upset when I saw fraud after fraud after fraud from these people. I used to be upset when I noticed the government wasn't following the law, but it has just been such a perennial trait of the government throughout all of my exposures to it that I simply have come to expect a complete lack of adherence to the law or constitution from every single member of it.
I don't know what one can do when powerful movements believe in alternate worlds described in themed collections of fiction materials and manifest cognitive anosognosia to all argumentation against their faiths. I honestly, sincerely did not think that I could even be subjected to such people in the United States of America, but that was back when I thought that we actually had a constitution and system of law that was followed.
I certainly didn't imagine that I would be trying to convince religiously psychotic believers in scientifically refuted religious fiction materials that they couldn't actually enforce their religious blasphemy legislation by ruining the lives of those who disrespected their sacred things. I didn't think that I would ever need to actually deal with this situation, in which religiously insane people referenced scientifically refuted fantasy worlds through themed collections of religious scriptures and attacked me with the support of the government of the United States of America for the crime of disbelieving in the scientifically falsified fantasy world described in their 20th century genres of scientifically refuted religious scriptures.
I thought that I was safe from such things in the USA, but that was back when I thought that the religious only had god themed delusions,
Are you a religious person? Well, if you answer in the affirmative, a neuroscientist says you are mentally unstable! A professor at Stanford University,
www.faceofmalawi.com
A professor at Stanford University, Robert Sapolsky, has said that religion is a mental illness, and that the behaviours exhibited by ‘prophets’ in religious texts are diagnosable acts.
The self-described atheist, who is also a neuroendocrinologist, argues that religion is comparable to a shared schizophrenia.
en.wikipedia.org
Social manias are mass movements which periodically sweep through societies. They are characterized by an outpouring of enthusiasm, mass involvement and millenarian goals. Social manias are contagious social epidemics, and as such they should be differentiated from mania in individuals.
Social manias come in different sizes and strengths. Some social manias fail to 'catch fire', while others persist for hundreds of years (although sometimes in severely attenuated form). Common to all is a vision of salvation, a new way of life, which if realized would radically change everyday life, ushering in a new world of freedom and justice.
The Taiping Rebellion is an excellent illustration, as it was both widespread and destructive and has no modern adherents to whom its use as an example would be a distraction. The Ghost dance which was briefly embraced by Native Americans of the Great Plains in 1890 is another excellent example which may be viewed in some historical perspective, as may The Crusades. Almost any form of religion could be argued to be a long-standing social mania, many of which have persisted through thousands of years.
livingwithschizophreniauk.org/religious-spiritual-delusions-schizophrenia/
For many people religion is one way that we understand the world and give meaning to our lives and certainly religion and spirituality play an important part in many people’s experiences of schizophrenia. For some sufferers religious delusions or intense religiously-based irrational thinking may be a component of their symptoms, for instance they may believe that they have been sent by God to become a great prophet.
I didn't realize that I dodged being burned at the stake by the convergent psychotics having god themed delusional ideation only to be burned at the stake by those having sex abuse and poisoning themed delusions. Burned at the stake through the same exact process mind you, of heresy accusations, of blasphemy accusations, and so on. There is fundamentally no difference between the god themed religions and the poisoning and sex abuse themed religions. There are just superficial distinctions between them really --- the underlying essence, the underlying meat of things is almost exactly identical, in that convergences of crazy fucks are referencing the fiction materials produced by the even more mentally ill as if they were referencing actual reality, the disbelievers in their fiction materials are heretics, those who disrespect their sacred things guilty of blasphemy and so on.
There has been essentially zero significant progress made toward the freedom that I thought had been established, which is greatly disappointing and induces a sense of hopelessness. I didn't realize that we had just hardly gotten to the point of not being put to death by the religious believers in god themed intension only to now what? Have to go through the same process with all of the other convergences of mentally ill believers in fiction materials?
Since the early 1980s, with the breakdown of the Communist empire, sex abusers have become the most common persecutors for paranoids.
andrewtaustin.com/catatonic-schizophrenia/
themes-of-schizophrenic-delusions
The most commonly cited example is that of the person who comes to believe that his family is poisoning him.
This isn't an issue we should even be dealing with though. Because theism is but one type of an establishment of religion, with all of the other themed being equally religious even if not equally theistic. Theism and religion are not the same thing, rather theism is a sort of religion. The first amendment of our constitution doesn't prohibit a theistic establishment of religion from being respected, but rather it prohibits any establishment of religion of any form from being respected.
en.wikipedia.org
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]
That alone renders the entirety of the Drug War and Sex Cult legislation invalid, but it isn't like I seriously except for my constitutional rights to be upheld, and the citizenry of our nation certainly doesn't give the slightest damn that the governmental representatives they elected are cheaters who don't follow the constitution or the law as it suits them because nobody is going to do shit about it anyway.
