Tesla
Fallen Angel
★★
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2022
- Posts
- 620
It's a very known fact that the concept of humanity goes beyond biological limitations, but very little is thought about the implications for that.
Well, if humanity is a logical system, then the reason we're failing is because of some logical inconsistency in the concept. I defend 'body over mind', the complete reverse of what's being human, is the source of all other inconsistencies, including capitalism and men's issues.
You see, men are biologically stronger, and without humanity, that would mean they're the more 'evil-bodied' according to the predatory logic of nature and capitalism itself. In fact, that's the whole reason why women are always seen as victims in whatever system: because animals which are incapable of conceiving a mind over matter perspective assume that, if everything fails, men can still collectively subjugate women, and the mere possibility is enough to warrant their dehumanization.
That perspective dehumanizes men, but above all, it denies that humanity is even real because such logic places men as the responsible party for providing it as well; even when women are perceived as the 'more human', they won't stand up for the concept's axiom of mind over matter, instead vehemently claiming victimhood over their weaker bodies. To those women, human is the same as 'harmless'.
What I mean is: civilization can never be collectively human if people don't realize that being human/conscious/intelligent is going beyond nature precisely because we can understand it. As long as you believe that bodies *must* be over mind forever (not that they currently do, since that's a real problem), you'll be partially responsible for your own dehumanization.
Well, if humanity is a logical system, then the reason we're failing is because of some logical inconsistency in the concept. I defend 'body over mind', the complete reverse of what's being human, is the source of all other inconsistencies, including capitalism and men's issues.
You see, men are biologically stronger, and without humanity, that would mean they're the more 'evil-bodied' according to the predatory logic of nature and capitalism itself. In fact, that's the whole reason why women are always seen as victims in whatever system: because animals which are incapable of conceiving a mind over matter perspective assume that, if everything fails, men can still collectively subjugate women, and the mere possibility is enough to warrant their dehumanization.
That perspective dehumanizes men, but above all, it denies that humanity is even real because such logic places men as the responsible party for providing it as well; even when women are perceived as the 'more human', they won't stand up for the concept's axiom of mind over matter, instead vehemently claiming victimhood over their weaker bodies. To those women, human is the same as 'harmless'.
What I mean is: civilization can never be collectively human if people don't realize that being human/conscious/intelligent is going beyond nature precisely because we can understand it. As long as you believe that bodies *must* be over mind forever (not that they currently do, since that's a real problem), you'll be partially responsible for your own dehumanization.
Last edited: