Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpilled tweet by economics professor

7C8A701B 56DE 496A B517 6052F72B919C
 
Based AF

we need more people to get blackpilled so pro incel policies start getting popular.

One day we shall see pro incel governments rise up and take power.
 
I mean, economics is the study of supply and demand and right now there is a surplus supply of betas looking to have sex and a low demand for betas due to the market for Chad cock so as a result the sexual activity of betas is decreasing thus creating incels.

I see no issue with an economist mentioning this topic.
 
1533434629698

1533434676085

Here we go with the "force women to be sex slaves" strawmen and incel-hate.

also "I can't imagine feeling so entitled" this is a fucking liberal woman, femoids and gentlemen.
 
Why are socialists, communists, and basically all other leftists so vehemently pro-wealth distribution, but get so utterly ASSBLASTED at the mere mention of sex redistribution?
Seems pretty hypocritical to me, since they're supposed to stand for equality for all.
 
Of course stacey is against it
not to mention that the shecky guy, the one who posted the morgan freeman pic, has a total soyboy face as his profile pic. Even got "geek" as his twitter description.
Why are socialists, communists, and basically all other leftists so vehemently pro-wealth distribution, but get so utterly ASSBLASTED at the mere mention of sex redistribution?
Seems pretty hypocritical to me, since they're supposed to stand for equality for all.
because it subtly suggests that women are contributing to pain of their fellow humans, which is the ultimate sin for leftists. Men and solely men is the source of all evil. There is multiple reasons for their hate on men. But that is a whole thread
 
I srs he hope he gets put in jail for committing a hatecrime. not cool to tweet reality.
 
Why are socialists, communists, and basically all other leftists so vehemently pro-wealth distribution, but get so utterly ASSBLASTED at the mere mention of sex redistribution?
Seems pretty hypocritical to me, since they're supposed to stand for equality for all.

It goes the other way too. I've never understood why most anti-degeneracy people are so against wealth redistribution. I have basically been a liberal all my life but I am against fornication and think it should be punished.
 
Foids are wired to want only chad. What this "redistribution" will help? It will not make them want us. So you will have in your house a hateful and frustrated foid because she cannot get chad. Why do you need this? She will be on her back while you fuck her and hate every bit of you because you are not chad.
Those who want to "redistribute" sex are like people who are trying to get a lionesse to fuck a haina instead of a lion.
 
Hanson fails to provide any examples of redistribution that aren't rape. He shouldn't have said that, tbh.

It would be nice if the female brain was capable of empathy, and would be open to having sex with a suffering incel, but we know that's never happening.
 
It goes the other way too. I've never understood why most anti-degeneracy people are so against wealth redistribution. I have basically been a liberal all my life but I am against fornication and think it should be punished.

Because wealth redistribution only works in small low-population, homogenous societies. Like Norway or Iceland.
 
Foids are wired to want only chad. What this "redistribution" will help? It will not make them want us. So you will have in your house a hateful and frustrated foid because she cannot get chad. Why do you need this? She will be on her back while you fuck her and hate every bit of you because you are not chad.
Those who want to "redistribute" sex are like people who are trying to get a lionesse to fuck a haina instead of a lion.

Women only crave what they have a chance of getting. If you make it impossible for a woman to get Chad, she will stop craving Chad. When girls are young they all want Justin Bieber, but then they realize they will never get Justin Bieber and they are happy with the most attractive guy in their school.
 
Hanson fails to provide any examples of redistribution that aren't rape.

Saying redistribution of sex is rape is like saying redistribution of wealth is theft.

The system of monogamy and culturally-enforced slut shaming was the best system for redistribution of sex. Unfortunately feminism destroyed that.
 
Because wealth redistribution only works in small low-population, homogenous societies. Like Norway or Iceland.

There are large scale systems that would work. You could have a large system of many small communes where individuals are paid based on how much their commune produces. This way they have selfish incentive to work but they live in an egalitarian environment. Why does homogeneity matter?
 
Women only crave what they have a chance of getting. If you make it impossible for a woman to get Chad, she will stop craving Chad. When girls are young they all want Justin Bieber, but then they realize they will never get Justin Bieber and they are happy with the most attractive guy in their school.
You will always have somebody who is more attractive than an incel. It's not a one Bieber for the whole nation. Chads are millions.
Anyway, this is all theoretical like communism, this ship is sailed long ago and any "redistribution" attempts will have a devastating aspects on the society, maybe even a civil war. There is no hope for us, we will never be loved. Just accept it and pursue other interests like moneymaxing.
Saying redistribution of sex is rape is like saying redistribution of wealth is theft.
It's not theft, it's more like robbery at a gunpoint.
The system of monogamy and culturally-enforced slut shaming was the best system for redistribution of sex. Unfortunately feminism destroyed that.
It's distributing sex, not love. We can get sex by escortceling or sextourismceling. What we miss is love and affection, and we will never get it.
 
Last edited:
There are large scale systems that would work. You could have a large system of many small communes where individuals are paid based on how much their commune produces. This way they have selfish incentive to work but they live in an egalitarian environment. Why does homogeneity matter?

Again, you can't start with theoretical blank-slate scenarios.

Homogeneity matters because of tribalism - racial, religious, and cultural. Norwegians are fine with sky-high tax rates because it mostly helps those they share an affinity with. Same reason why so many Americans (even if they are poor), regardless of race, hate taxes and hate socialized health care.
It's distributing sex, not love. We can get sex by escortceling or sextourismceling. What we miss is love and affection, and we will never get it.

Cope. I think most westerners forget how gender relations used to be a while ago.

My grandfather would have been an incel had he been born in this era. He was the epitome of a white knight beta and yet he was adored by my grandmother. The difference is that women were socially shamed and ostracized from the community for degenerate behaviors.

And without a welfare state, being socially ostracized from your community is equal to death pretty much.

sextourismceling
That's not redistribution of sex.

escortceling
Outlawed and severly punished in most countries. And even in the countries where it is legal, only Czech has affordable escorts.[/quote]
 
Last edited:
It goes the other way too. I've never understood why most anti-degeneracy people are so against wealth redistribution. I have basically been a liberal all my life but I am against fornication and think it should be punished.
This is why we need to create our own political party.
At the rate we're growing, I guarantee incels will be an official campaign issue within the next 10-20 years.
INCELISTAN ZINDABAD
 
Again, you can't start with theoretical blank-slate scenarios.

Not a "theoretical blank-slate scenario" - I was describing the kibbutz system in Israel, which has been very successful.

Homogeneity matters because of tribalism - racial, religious, and cultural. Norwegians are fine with sky-high tax rates because it mostly helps those they share an affinity with. Same reason why so many Americans (even if they are poor), regardless of race, hate taxes and hate socialized health care.

Genetic similarity is not the only reason for compassion. People feel compassion for dogs even though people are genetically dissimilar to dogs. Why? Because historically helping dogs has contributed to human survival, so it was genetically advantageous for people to evolve to be compassionate towards dogs.

What if helping people who are genetically dissimilar to us can contribute to the survival of those who are genetically similar to us? What if a tribe of people had genes that are extremely advantageous for survival, which your tribe does not have, and your tribe has useful genes which the other tribe does not have? - would it not be beneficial for both tribes to work for the survival of each other, so that they can interbreed and acquire each others' genes?
 
Based professor.
 
It goes the other way too. I've never understood why most anti-degeneracy people are so against wealth redistribution. I have basically been a liberal all my life but I am against fornication and think it should be punished.

In my opinion if you're against taking money from rich liberals and jews then you can't be anti-degeneracy. We could burn the money for all I care, just as long as they don't have it. And a lot of "liberals" are just virtue signaling hypcrites and some the biggest capitalists in the world. Take a fat liberal fuck like Michael Moore for instance. The guy has enough money to never worry about money ever again even if he never receives a single penny more. Yet the greedy fat fuck can't help himself. He still wants you to buy his shitty fucking movies so he can keep living in a fucking mansion.
 
Finally an economist has said what I’ve been thinking for 20 years...
Why are socialists, communists, and basically all other leftists so vehemently pro-wealth distribution, but get so utterly ASSBLASTED at the mere mention of sex redistribution?
Seems pretty hypocritical to me, since they're supposed to stand for equality for all.

JFL @ the triggered foids going all Rape™ teehee
 
Last edited:
1533459295886


I'd rather be forced into sex a million times than be an incel. Retarded ass normie
 
I've been following that guy's non-economic blogging for years. He likely wrecked his reputation with the mainstream media with that tweet. He was usually considered a wonky, super-intellectual libertarian. After he basically came out as being on the side of incels, some soy at Slate.com labeled him as "America's creepiest economist." He's been on the defense since. He stuck out his neck and possibly sullied his reputation...for us...
 
Saying redistribution of sex is rape is like saying redistribution of wealth is theft.

The system of monogamy and culturally-enforced slut shaming was the best system for redistribution of sex. Unfortunately feminism destroyed that.
Taking wealth from someone who is wealthy and giving it to someone who isn't is pure theft.
View attachment 33447

I'd rather be forced into sex a million times than be an incel. Retarded ass normie
You would be forced to have sex with people you felt no attraction to? This bitch sounds like an entitled dumbass but I dont believe women should be forced to have sex with incel guys, that's why prostitution should be legal and our society shouldn't support slurs who dont get married and support soyboys the way it does.
 
Last edited:
Someone else who came out as having suffered as an incel is physicist Scott Aaronson. Here is what Aaronson wrote on his blog. Guy works at MIT:

Here’s the thing: I spent my formative years—basically, from the age of 12 until my mid-20s—feeling not “entitled,” not “privileged,” but terrified. I was terrified that one of my female classmates would somehow find out that I sexually desired her, and that the instant she did, I would be scorned, laughed at, called a creep and a weirdo, maybe even expelled from school or sent to prison. You can call that my personal psychological problem if you want, but it was strongly reinforced by everything I picked up from my environment: to take one example, the sexual-assault prevention workshops we had to attend regularly as undergrads, with their endless lists of all the forms of human interaction that “might be” sexual harassment or assault, and their refusal, ever, to specify anything that definitely wouldn’t be sexual harassment or assault. I left each of those workshops with enough fresh paranoia and self-hatred to last me through another year. […]

Of course, I was smart enough to realize that maybe this was silly, maybe I was overanalyzing things. So I scoured the feminist literature for any statement to the effect that my fears were as silly as I hoped they were. But I didn’t find any. On the contrary: I found reams of text about how even the most ordinary male/female interactions are filled with “microaggressions,” and how even the most “enlightened” males—especially the most “enlightened” males, in fact—are filled with hidden entitlement and privilege and a propensity to sexual violence that could burst forth at any moment.

Because of my fears—my fears of being “outed” as a nerdy heterosexual male, and therefore as a potential creep or sex criminal—I had constant suicidal thoughts. As Bertrand Russell wrote of his own adolescence: “I was put off from suicide only by the desire to learn more mathematics.” At one point, I actually begged a psychiatrist to prescribe drugs that would chemically castrate me (I had researched which ones), because a life of mathematical asceticism was the only future that I could imagine for myself.


Feminists came down on him hard for that, one of them being Amanda Marcotte:

https://archive.fo/En6Qy

Aaronson by the way has defended the guy who this thread is about (Robin Hanson). I'm pretty certain Robin Hanson has implied that he used to be incel as well. By the way both of these guys are now married...successful status-maxing/beta-buxing...
 
Foids are wired to want only chad. What this "redistribution" will help? It will not make them want us. So you will have in your house a hateful and frustrated foid because she cannot get chad. Why do you need this? She will be on her back while you fuck her and hate every bit of you because you are not chad.
Those who want to "redistribute" sex are like people who are trying to get a lionesse to fuck a haina instead of a lion.
Exactly.
Why are socialists, communists, and basically all other leftists so vehemently pro-wealth distribution, but get so utterly ASSBLASTED at the mere mention of sex redistribution?
Seems pretty hypocritical to me, since they're supposed to stand for equality for all.
Death is a preferable alternative to communism.
 
Foids are wired to want only chad. What this "redistribution" will help? It will not make them want us. So you will have in your house a hateful and frustrated foid because she cannot get chad. Why do you need this? She will be on her back while you fuck her and hate every bit of you because you are not chad.
Those who want to "redistribute" sex are like people who are trying to get a lionesse to fuck a haina instead of a lion.


Women are hard-wired to want the best possible partners available to them. If they can get chad, they will go for him, but if they can't, they will lower their standards. The problem with today's society is that all women can have casual sex with chads and have no reason to lower their standards. But the average woman has to share chad with other women and that makes her miserable long-term. Before the sexual revolution, most women couldn't get chad. One would think that sexual access to chads has made today's women much happier, but actually, the opposite is true: female happiness has declined since the sexual revolution.
 
Last edited:
Based AF

we need more people to get blackpilled so pro incel policies start getting popular.

One day we shall see pro incel governments rise up and take power.
Or we could just start a revolution. I'm down for that. A revolution wouldn't need anywhere near full public support. The Bolsheviks took over Russia with about 25% public support, and we probably don't even need that much.
Why are socialists, communists, and basically all other leftists so vehemently pro-wealth distribution, but get so utterly ASSBLASTED at the mere mention of sex redistribution?
Seems pretty hypocritical to me, since they're supposed to stand for equality for all.
I agree with you. As someone who calls themself a communist sympathizer, I do think it's hypocritical. I do think also that in modern society people get offended way too easily sometimes. The standard of communism: "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need." That should include sex as well as money, both are needs.
 
Last edited:
Based AF

we need more people to get blackpilled so pro incel policies start getting popular.

One day we shall see pro incel governments rise up and take power.
I would rather ascend and leave everyone else in the dirt.
 
View attachment 33404
View attachment 33405
Here we go with the "force women to be sex slaves" strawmen and incel-hate.

also "I can't imagine feeling so entitled" this is a fucking liberal woman, femoids and gentlemen.
LOL at them using that Morgan Freeman meme, don't they know he got #metoo'd? The guys a sexual harasser for God's sake!
 
Seems to have been deleted. Did he cave in to the cucks? Anyone got a backup?
 
Hanson fails to provide any examples of redistribution that aren't rape. He shouldn't have said that, tbh.

It would be nice if the female brain was capable of empathy, and would be open to having sex with a suffering incel, but we know that's never happening.

Indeed, it's a sad realisation that you can't fight against six million years of evolution or argue with people who are clearly not interested in facts. I'm suprised to see incel hate being as widespread as it is, I imagined it would be bad but it's significantly worse that I thought.
 
I would rather ascend and leave everyone else in the dirt.
Our lack of experiencing teen love has left us scarred for life, even if we ascend it’s over.
 
Our lack of experiencing teen love has left us scarred for life, even if we ascend it’s over.
I'm only 18, if I can get plastic surgery before I turn 20 it will not be over.

Just need to wait 2 years and nobody will be able to call me a fakecel.
 
He also said rape is no worse than being cuckol'd and that he'd rather being raped than being cheated on.
Here's a direct quote:
id-prefer-to-be-raped-rather-than-cuckolded-any-other-men-have-a-preference.jpg
 
I'm only 18, if I can get plastic surgery before I turn 20 it will not be over.

Just need to wait 2 years and nobody will be able to call me a fakecel.
You still missed out on your cute 14 yr old school girl gf waiting for you at the school gates after school bro

It’s overrrrrr
 
I mean, economics is the study of supply and demand and right now there is a surplus supply of betas looking to have sex and a low demand for betas due to the market for Chad cock so as a result the sexual activity of betas is decreasing thus creating incels.

I see no issue with an economist mentioning this topic.
The supply would be prostitution
 
:soy::soy::soy: are Soying themselves over this.
 

Similar threads

Flick
Replies
20
Views
621
Genetically Doomed
Genetically Doomed
sexualeconomist
Replies
13
Views
277
AntoCel
A
coping_manlet
Replies
32
Views
566
oldNgreycel
oldNgreycel
Soystein
Replies
7
Views
261
reveries
reveries
Lurker1488
Replies
17
Views
324
SilverBullet
SilverBullet

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top