I
incel4life
Captain
★
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2017
- Posts
- 1,573
Of course stacey is against itView attachment 33404
View attachment 33405
Here we go with the "force women to be sex slaves" strawmen and incel-hate.
also "I can't imagine feeling so entitled" this is a fucking liberal woman, femoids and gentlemen.
not to mention that the shecky guy, the one who posted the morgan freeman pic, has a total soyboy face as his profile pic. Even got "geek" as his twitter description.Of course stacey is against it
because it subtly suggests that women are contributing to pain of their fellow humans, which is the ultimate sin for leftists. Men and solely men is the source of all evil. There is multiple reasons for their hate on men. But that is a whole threadWhy are socialists, communists, and basically all other leftists so vehemently pro-wealth distribution, but get so utterly ASSBLASTED at the mere mention of sex redistribution?
Seems pretty hypocritical to me, since they're supposed to stand for equality for all.
Why are socialists, communists, and basically all other leftists so vehemently pro-wealth distribution, but get so utterly ASSBLASTED at the mere mention of sex redistribution?
Seems pretty hypocritical to me, since they're supposed to stand for equality for all.
It goes the other way too. I've never understood why most anti-degeneracy people are so against wealth redistribution. I have basically been a liberal all my life but I am against fornication and think it should be punished.
Foids are wired to want only chad. What this "redistribution" will help? It will not make them want us. So you will have in your house a hateful and frustrated foid because she cannot get chad. Why do you need this? She will be on her back while you fuck her and hate every bit of you because you are not chad.
Those who want to "redistribute" sex are like people who are trying to get a lionesse to fuck a haina instead of a lion.
Hanson fails to provide any examples of redistribution that aren't rape.
Because wealth redistribution only works in small low-population, homogenous societies. Like Norway or Iceland.
You will always have somebody who is more attractive than an incel. It's not a one Bieber for the whole nation. Chads are millions.Women only crave what they have a chance of getting. If you make it impossible for a woman to get Chad, she will stop craving Chad. When girls are young they all want Justin Bieber, but then they realize they will never get Justin Bieber and they are happy with the most attractive guy in their school.
It's not theft, it's more like robbery at a gunpoint.Saying redistribution of sex is rape is like saying redistribution of wealth is theft.
It's distributing sex, not love. We can get sex by escortceling or sextourismceling. What we miss is love and affection, and we will never get it.The system of monogamy and culturally-enforced slut shaming was the best system for redistribution of sex. Unfortunately feminism destroyed that.
There are large scale systems that would work. You could have a large system of many small communes where individuals are paid based on how much their commune produces. This way they have selfish incentive to work but they live in an egalitarian environment. Why does homogeneity matter?
It's distributing sex, not love. We can get sex by escortceling or sextourismceling. What we miss is love and affection, and we will never get it.
That's not redistribution of sex.sextourismceling
Outlawed and severly punished in most countries. And even in the countries where it is legal, only Czech has affordable escorts.[/quote]escortceling
This is why we need to create our own political party.It goes the other way too. I've never understood why most anti-degeneracy people are so against wealth redistribution. I have basically been a liberal all my life but I am against fornication and think it should be punished.
Again, you can't start with theoretical blank-slate scenarios.
Homogeneity matters because of tribalism - racial, religious, and cultural. Norwegians are fine with sky-high tax rates because it mostly helps those they share an affinity with. Same reason why so many Americans (even if they are poor), regardless of race, hate taxes and hate socialized health care.
It goes the other way too. I've never understood why most anti-degeneracy people are so against wealth redistribution. I have basically been a liberal all my life but I am against fornication and think it should be punished.
Based professor.
Why are socialists, communists, and basically all other leftists so vehemently pro-wealth distribution, but get so utterly ASSBLASTED at the mere mention of sex redistribution?
Seems pretty hypocritical to me, since they're supposed to stand for equality for all.
Taking wealth from someone who is wealthy and giving it to someone who isn't is pure theft.Saying redistribution of sex is rape is like saying redistribution of wealth is theft.
The system of monogamy and culturally-enforced slut shaming was the best system for redistribution of sex. Unfortunately feminism destroyed that.
You would be forced to have sex with people you felt no attraction to? This bitch sounds like an entitled dumbass but I dont believe women should be forced to have sex with incel guys, that's why prostitution should be legal and our society shouldn't support slurs who dont get married and support soyboys the way it does.View attachment 33447
I'd rather be forced into sex a million times than be an incel. Retarded ass normie
Here’s the thing: I spent my formative years—basically, from the age of 12 until my mid-20s—feeling not “entitled,” not “privileged,” but terrified. I was terrified that one of my female classmates would somehow find out that I sexually desired her, and that the instant she did, I would be scorned, laughed at, called a creep and a weirdo, maybe even expelled from school or sent to prison. You can call that my personal psychological problem if you want, but it was strongly reinforced by everything I picked up from my environment: to take one example, the sexual-assault prevention workshops we had to attend regularly as undergrads, with their endless lists of all the forms of human interaction that “might be” sexual harassment or assault, and their refusal, ever, to specify anything that definitely wouldn’t be sexual harassment or assault. I left each of those workshops with enough fresh paranoia and self-hatred to last me through another year. […]
Of course, I was smart enough to realize that maybe this was silly, maybe I was overanalyzing things. So I scoured the feminist literature for any statement to the effect that my fears were as silly as I hoped they were. But I didn’t find any. On the contrary: I found reams of text about how even the most ordinary male/female interactions are filled with “microaggressions,” and how even the most “enlightened” males—especially the most “enlightened” males, in fact—are filled with hidden entitlement and privilege and a propensity to sexual violence that could burst forth at any moment.
Because of my fears—my fears of being “outed” as a nerdy heterosexual male, and therefore as a potential creep or sex criminal—I had constant suicidal thoughts. As Bertrand Russell wrote of his own adolescence: “I was put off from suicide only by the desire to learn more mathematics.” At one point, I actually begged a psychiatrist to prescribe drugs that would chemically castrate me (I had researched which ones), because a life of mathematical asceticism was the only future that I could imagine for myself.
Exactly.Foids are wired to want only chad. What this "redistribution" will help? It will not make them want us. So you will have in your house a hateful and frustrated foid because she cannot get chad. Why do you need this? She will be on her back while you fuck her and hate every bit of you because you are not chad.
Those who want to "redistribute" sex are like people who are trying to get a lionesse to fuck a haina instead of a lion.
Death is a preferable alternative to communism.Why are socialists, communists, and basically all other leftists so vehemently pro-wealth distribution, but get so utterly ASSBLASTED at the mere mention of sex redistribution?
Seems pretty hypocritical to me, since they're supposed to stand for equality for all.
Foids are wired to want only chad. What this "redistribution" will help? It will not make them want us. So you will have in your house a hateful and frustrated foid because she cannot get chad. Why do you need this? She will be on her back while you fuck her and hate every bit of you because you are not chad.
Those who want to "redistribute" sex are like people who are trying to get a lionesse to fuck a haina instead of a lion.
Or we could just start a revolution. I'm down for that. A revolution wouldn't need anywhere near full public support. The Bolsheviks took over Russia with about 25% public support, and we probably don't even need that much.Based AF
we need more people to get blackpilled so pro incel policies start getting popular.
One day we shall see pro incel governments rise up and take power.
I agree with you. As someone who calls themself a communist sympathizer, I do think it's hypocritical. I do think also that in modern society people get offended way too easily sometimes. The standard of communism: "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need." That should include sex as well as money, both are needs.Why are socialists, communists, and basically all other leftists so vehemently pro-wealth distribution, but get so utterly ASSBLASTED at the mere mention of sex redistribution?
Seems pretty hypocritical to me, since they're supposed to stand for equality for all.
You would be forced to have sex with people you felt no attraction to? .
I would rather ascend and leave everyone else in the dirt.Based AF
we need more people to get blackpilled so pro incel policies start getting popular.
One day we shall see pro incel governments rise up and take power.
LOL at them using that Morgan Freeman meme, don't they know he got #metoo'd? The guys a sexual harasser for God's sake!View attachment 33404
View attachment 33405
Here we go with the "force women to be sex slaves" strawmen and incel-hate.
also "I can't imagine feeling so entitled" this is a fucking liberal woman, femoids and gentlemen.
Hanson fails to provide any examples of redistribution that aren't rape. He shouldn't have said that, tbh.
It would be nice if the female brain was capable of empathy, and would be open to having sex with a suffering incel, but we know that's never happening.
Our lack of experiencing teen love has left us scarred for life, even if we ascend it’s over.I would rather ascend and leave everyone else in the dirt.
Then theres no denying you're a queercel.Any day of the cosmos's timeline if I get a date afterwards.
I'm only 18, if I can get plastic surgery before I turn 20 it will not be over.Our lack of experiencing teen love has left us scarred for life, even if we ascend it’s over.
You still missed out on your cute 14 yr old school girl gf waiting for you at the school gates after school broI'm only 18, if I can get plastic surgery before I turn 20 it will not be over.
Just need to wait 2 years and nobody will be able to call me a fakecel.
The supply would be prostitutionI mean, economics is the study of supply and demand and right now there is a surplus supply of betas looking to have sex and a low demand for betas due to the market for Chad cock so as a result the sexual activity of betas is decreasing thus creating incels.
I see no issue with an economist mentioning this topic.