Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

[Blackpill] The Only Way To Get A Chaste Female Is To Go For Younger Ones

  • Thread starter universallyabhorred
  • Start date
universallyabhorred

universallyabhorred

Banned
-
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
8,328
Every man's dream is to be able get a female who is unspoiled by other men. This includes a female who has not been kissed or done any other form of sexual activity, many people would think that what I am suggesting is wrong. However consider that the average female loses her virginity at 12 or 13 and has done sexual stuff such as kissing on the lips from all the way since the age of 10 or even 8 or 9. Considering how sexually degenerate western society is the only way to ensure getting a good female that can pair bond with you and will forever be yours is to go for younger females unfortunately such a thing is illegal this is western society's effort to mentally and physically ruin females for their future grooms.
 
As if younger females would want a disgusting incel.
 
GeneticDysfunction said:
As if younger females would want a disgusting incel.

They are less likely to be as shallow at that age since they do not yet know their own sexual market value.
 
Absolutely 100% spot on post.

Degenerates will say wanting a young teen/pre-teen virgin is immoral and disgusting, but apparently getting with a girl who's been fucked by half of Harlem is just fine and dandy.
 
GeneticDysfunction said:
As if younger females would want a disgusting incel.

If anything, younger women hate us more because they naturally look for the most genetically superior gl man.

Why do you think girls bully incels so harshly at young ages? 1st-12th grade are BRUTAL for most incels
 
ItheIthe said:
Absolutely 100% spot on post.

Degenerates will say wanting a young teen/pre-teen virgin is immoral and disgusting, but apparently getting with a girl who's been fucked by half of Harlem is just fine and dandy.

In this day and age it might be necessary to go for ones even younger since they have already been spoiled by pro slut propaganda.
 
universallyabhorred said:
In this day and age it might be necessary to go for ones even younger since they have already been spoiled by pro slut propaganda.

I agree and I would fully support anyone who does it. God forbid a man wants exclusivity instead of a girl whose reached peak emotional and sexual pleasure with other men.

You also know that looking to lock down a young female for marriage means you're taking it seriously, as opposed to all the hedonistic male boars out there only looking to take advantage of women. But morons still insist that child marriage is "immoral".
 
Below 10 is degenerate.
 
a-virgin-nigger said:
Below 10 is degenerate.

If they have already kissed a guy and have crushes on pretty boys like most females do by that age then they are not really innocent children.
 
The pairbond is everything, i have researched and posted about it quite abit, so far all the evidence points to the chemical bonding process being the most important element to a lasting relationship. 

Given that nearly 70% of females start having sexual relations by the age of 14 most females by the legal age of 17(here in Illinois)  are no longer virgin, meaning they have bonded with a guy already. These relationships usally dont last for many reasons, after the inital relationship the female fill's the void in her heart/vagina and has sex with ANOTHER guy. This happens over and over again, repeated forming and breaking of the pairbond damage the female for life. 

Sex becomes meaningless and she will never truely bond with a male again. Thats why the divorce rate skyrockets for nonvirgin marriges, even sleeping with one guy takes the rate from 5 to 10 percent and it gets worse from there. Given how sex is encouraged by society, the odds of finding the right female for us is really low.
 
Incelibate anarchist said:
The pairbond is everything, i have researched and posted about it quite abit, so far all the evidence points to the chemical bonding process being the most important element to a lasting relationship. 

Given that nearly 70% of females start having sexual relations by the age of 14 most females by the legal age of 17(here in Illinois)  are no longer virgin, meaning they have bonded with a guy already. These relationships usally dont last for many reasons, after the inital relationship the female fill's the void in her heart/vagina and has sex with ANOTHER guy. This happens over and over again, repeated forming and breaking of the pairbond damage the female for life. 

Sex becomes meaningless and she will never truely bond with a male again. Thats why the divorce rate skyrockets for nonvirgin marriges, even sleeping with one guy takes the rate from 5 to 10 percent and it gets worse from there. Given how sex is encouraged by society, the odds of finding the right female for us is really low.

100% correct. How the hell is partner #2, 3, 4, or 27 supposed to mean as much as the first?
 
universallyabhorred said:
a-virgin-nigger said:
Below 10 is degenerate.
If they have already kissed a guy and have crushes on pretty boys like most females do by that age then they are not really innocent children.

It's not if they're innocent or not. I don't know how you would force yourself to have a sexual relationship with a non sexually developed female unless you're a pedophile. It would be a waste.
 
ItheIthe said:
100% correct. How the hell is partner #2, 3, 4, or 27 supposed to mean as much as the first?

They just don't, she will never have new [font=Roboto-Regular, HelveticaNeue, Arial, sans-serif]Memorable Experience's with them. The chemical bond won't be the same either. Thats why a nonvirgin is worthless.[/font]
 
a-virgin-nigger said:
It's not if they're innocent or not. I don't know how you would force yourself to have a sexual relationship with a non sexually developed female unless you're a pedophile. It would be a waste.

Ofcourse we are talking about the early maturing sexually developed ones.
 
the new generation of JBs are worse than college sluts. Social media and feminism have ruined everything.
 
Agreed in full. God designed girls to reproduce at a young age. He made it possible for them to ovulate at 11 or 12 for a reason. (They are at their most innocent at those ages.) & Not only that, but he has made it so if you reproduce with a foid past 30, your child/ren would be born weak & autistic.
 
there needs to be a new society where at puberty two kids who are looksmatch and personality match are paired up in an arranged marriage and only allowed to separate if one or the other is abusive
 

Similar threads

BasedAdam
Replies
2
Views
72
Left4DeadDarkie
Left4DeadDarkie
Deep.Nest
Replies
35
Views
531
Deep.Nest
Deep.Nest
wastedcodeine
Replies
4
Views
180
wastedcodeine
wastedcodeine
Lv99_BixNood
Replies
4
Views
134
adharmi
adharmi

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top